Skip to main content
Log in

Research on the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation—an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the pressure of environmental degradation and resource depletion, Chinese companies are confronted with the need for transformation and upgrading promoted by technological innovation. However, environmental regulation can help to promote technological innovation. Based on the panel data of China’s 30 provincial levels during 2009–2016, firstly, this paper describes the connotation of environmental regulation and measurement intensity of the regulation. Then, the anti-driving effect of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation is analyzed. Finally, this paper analyzes the spatial heterogeneity of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation. The empirical results are as follows: (1) formal environmental regulation has effectively enhanced technological innovation of enterprises. However, informal environmental regulation generally can positively drive enterprise technology innovation. (2) The impact of environmental regulation on technological innovation of enterprises is spatially heterogeneous. On the one hand, the impact of formal environmental regulation on technological innovation has significant regional differences. The Eastern China generally supports the “Porter hypothesis,” while the Middle of China and Western China have the opposite performance. On the other hand, there is a threshold effect between environmental regulation and technological innovation. When the economic development level of the first lagging period is used as the threshold variable, with the gradual improvement of the economic development level, the technological innovation of the enterprise has the effect of first suppressing and promoting, and then verifying the threshold characteristics of environmental regulation on technology innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Tibet Autonomous Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region are not included in the 30 provinces.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2010) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102:131–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsmeier B (2017) Unions, collective relations laws and R&D investment in emerging and developing countries. Res Policy 46(1):292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Lee JW (1993) International comparisons of educational attainment. J Monetary Econ 32(3):363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao YH, You JX, Liu HC (2017) Optimal environmental regulation intensity of manufacturing technology innovation in view of pollution heterogeneity. Sustainability 9(7):1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty P, Chatterjee C (2017) Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India. Res Policy 46(5):939–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Campi MT, García-Quevedo J, Martínez-Ros E (2017) What are the determinants of investment in environmental R&D? Energy Policy 104:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Cázares C, Bayona-Sáez C, García-Marco C (2013) You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: technological innovation efficiency. Res Policy 42:1239–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Falco SE, Renzi A (2015) The role of sunk cost and slack resources in innovation: a conceptual reading in an entrepreneurial perspective. Enterpren Res J 5(3):167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Féres J, Reynaud A (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 52(1):65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldar B, Banerjee N (2004) Impact of informal regulation of pollution on water quality in rivers in India. J Environ Manag 73(2):117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2003) Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):384–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen B (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang FX, Wang ZJ, Bai JH (2013) The dual effect of environment regulation’s impact on innovation—an empirical study based on dynamic panel data of Jiangsu manufacturing. China Ind Econ (7):44–55

  • Jiang Z, Wang Z, Li Z (2018) The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on innovation performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 203:482–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Managi S, Rodríguez MC, Haščič I, Fujii H, Souchier M (2017) Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation. Energy Econ 63:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria V (2007) Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India. Ecol Econ 63:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller R, Manderson E (2012) Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34(2):211–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langpap C, Shimshack JP (2010) Private citizen suits and public enforcement: substitutes or complements? J Environ Econ Manag 59(3):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30(2):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wu SS (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153:342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li WH, Gu Y, Liu F, Li C (2018) The effect of command-and-control regulation on environmental technological innovation in China: a spatial econometric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3678-3

  • Liu YL, Li ZH, Yin XM (2018) The effects of three types of environmental regulation on energy consumption—evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:27334–27351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani M, Wheeler D (1998) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. J Environ Dev 7(3):215–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin G (2014) Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Res Policy 43(2):310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah CN, Long XL, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29678–29698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller S (2015) Indirectly induced innovation: consequences for environmental policy analysis. UC Santa Barbara, Mimeograph

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 104(6):1314–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van Der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Economic Perspect 9(4):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahko K (2016) Internationalization of corporate R&D activities and innovation performance. Ind Corp Change 25(6):1019–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, Black A, Nath P, Muyldermans L (2010) Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector. Manag Decis 48(10):1493–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren SG, Yuan BL, Ma X, Chen XH (2014) International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of China’s industrial sectors. China Economic Rev 28:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen N, Liu FC (2012) Can intensive environmental regulation promote technological innovation? Porter hypothesis reexamined. Chin Soft Sci (4):49–59

  • Shimshack JP, Ward MB (2005) Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. J Environ Econ Manag 50(3):519–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Wang S, Sun J (2018) Environmental regulations, staff quality, green technology, R&D efficiency, and profit in manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Change 133:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu HF (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):5394–5409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie RH, Yuan YJ, Huang JJ (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yabar H, Uwasu M, Hara K (2013) Tracking environmental innovations and policy regulations in Japan: case studies on dioxin emissions and electric home appliances recycling. J Clean Prod 44:152–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176(3):895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan BL, Ren SG, Chen XH (2017) Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China's manufacturing industry?—a panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors. J Clean Prod 149:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Sun B (2016) The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. J Clean Prod 112(4):1528–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YM, Zhu FM, He LL (2009) Definition, classification and evolution of environmental regulations. China Popul Resour Environ 19(6):85–90 In Chinese

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper, upon which we have improved the content.

Funding

The authors gratefully recognize the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71874189).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Yang, T. & Zhang, M. Research on the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation—an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 21835–21848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05532-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05532-0

Keywords

Navigation