Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The control of corruption and energy efficiency relationship: an empirical note

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims at exploring the impact of corruption control on energy efficiency in 60 countries categorized by income: lower middle (LMI), upper middle (UMI), and high (HI). Panel methodology was utilized taking the period of 2000–2017. As cross-sectional dependence is confirmed among the tested equations, the Pesaran (J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312, 2007) unit root test and the augmented mean group estimator proposed by Eberhardt and Teal (2010) were utilized to overcome this matter. The results in general indicate that the lower the corruption is, the more the energy efficiency for all income group economies. Moreover, renewable energy reduces energy efficiency in lower-middle income and high-income economies while its effect is positive in middle-income economies. In addition, the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) found to be present in all income group economies. Lastly, causality relationships among energy efficiency, corruption, and GDP were present mostly in upper-middle income and high-income economies. From the results, it was recommended that the countries from all income groups should increase their corruption control for the purpose of enhancing energy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Low-income countries were excluded in this study due to the lack of data.

References

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Econ 32:1392–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2011a) Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption–growth nexus: evidence from emerging market economies. Appl Energy 88:5226–5230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2011b) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy 38:656–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2011c) The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Appl Energy 88:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kasim F, Søreide T, Williams A (2013) Corruption and reduced oil production: an additional resource curse factor? Energy Policy 54:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Marhubi FA (2000) Corruption and inflation. Econ Lett 66:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY, CheSab CNB (2013) Examining the bi-directional long run relationship between renewable energy consumption and GDP growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auriol E, Blanc A (2009) Capture and corruption in public utilities: the cases of water and electricity in sub-Saharan Africa. Util Policy 17:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi B (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK, Farzanegan MR, Thum M (2012) Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: theory and evidence. Ecol Econ 75:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coers R, Sanders M (2013) The energy–GDP nexus; addressing an old question with new methods. Energy Econ 36:708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt M, Teal F (2010) Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Economics Series Working Papers 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. Available from https://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/4729/paper515.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2018

  • Euromonitor database (2013) Global Market Information (GIMD). Available from http://www.portal.euromonitor.com/portal/server.pt?space=Login&control=Redirect. Accessed 28 March 2018

  • Evrensel AY (2010) Corruption, growth and growth volatility. Int Rev Econ Financ 19:501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatai K, Oxley L, Scrimgeour FG (2004) Modelling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, The Philippines and Thailand. Math Comput Simul 64:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Vollebergh HRG, Dijkgraaf E (2004) Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 47:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BN, Hwang MJ, Yang CW (2008) Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: a dynamic panel data approach. Ecol Econ 67:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik BS, Wei SJ (2009) Corruption and cross-border investment in emerging markets: Firm-level evidence. J Int Money Financ 28:605–624

  • Kahsai MS, Nondo C, Schaeffer PV, Gebremedhin TG (2012) Income level and the energy consumption–GDP nexus: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Econ 34:739–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC (2005) Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Econ 27:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2007) Energy consumption and GDP revisited: a panel analysis of developed and developing countries. Energy Econ 29:1206–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão A (2010) Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecol Econ 69:2191–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovei L, Alastair M (2000) The costs of corruption for the poor-the energy sector. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11437 license: CC BY 3.0 Unported. Accessed 1 May 2017

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S, Popp S (2010) A note on the long-run elasticities from the energy consumption–GDP relationship. Appl Energy 87:1054–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:3220–3225

  • Park J (2012) Corruption, soundness of the banking sector, and economic growth: a cross-country study. J Int Money Financ 31:907–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, CESifo Working Paper, No. 1229, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich. Available from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/18868/1/cesifo1_wp1229.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pop-Jordanov J, Markovska N, Pop-Jordanova N, Simoska SM (2004) Occupational entropy and mind indicators for sustainable energy development. Int J Green Energy 1(3):327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prindle B, Eldridge M, Eckhardt M, Frederick A (2007) The twin pillars of sustainable energy: synergies between energy efficiency and renewable energy technology and policy.Report Number E074, American Council for an Energy-Effi cient Economy, American Council on Renewable Energy, Washington, USA, 2007. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.545.4606&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

  • Saha S, Gounder R (2013) Corruption and economic development nexus: variations across income levels in a non-linear framework. Econ Model 31:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimi AFM, Abedini M (2012) Control of corruption and inflation tax: new evidence from selected developing countries. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 62:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaleheen MU (2008) Corruption and saving in a panel of countries. J Macroecon 30:1285–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Alliance to Save Energy (2011) Annual Report. Available from: https://www.ase.org/sites/ase.org/files/resources/Media%20browser/2011_annual_report.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2018

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SY (2006) Corruption and cross-border investment by multinational firms. J Comp Econ 34:839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilhan Ozturk.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U. & Solarin, S.A. The control of corruption and energy efficiency relationship: an empirical note. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 17277–17283 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05016-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05016-1

Keywords

Navigation