Advertisement

The “COFFEE BIN” concept: centralized collection and torrefaction of spent coffee grounds

  • Stergios VakalisEmail author
  • Konstantinos Moustakas
  • Vittoria Benedetti
  • Eleonora Cordioli
  • Francesco Patuzzi
  • Maria Loizidou
  • Marco Baratieri
Advances & Prospects in the field of Waste Management
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Spent coffee grounds are the moist solid residues of coffee brewing and in most cases, the disposal is done without any intermediate valorization actions for materials and energy recovery. State-of-the-art applications include extraction of the liquids and application of high-temperature pyrolysis. Both strategies have significant potential but have also some disadvantages (extensive pre-treatment, high costs) when applied on a large scale. This study highlights the lack of mild pyrolysis valorization strategies and presents the idea of the “COFFEE BIN.” Separated spent coffee grounds are collected, dried, and thermally treated. The optimal pyrolysis conditions were identified and product characteristics and the mass balances were assessed. Elemental analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, physisorption analysis and higher heating value (HHV) determination was performed for the characterization of the carbonaceous products. The torrefied coffee grounds returned solid yields from 78 to 83%, which are significantly higher than in other cases of conventional biomass and heating values of 24–25 MJ/kg. Higher temperature pyrolysis did not sustain the advantage of increased returned mass yields and the adsorbance potential of all the carbonaceous products was lower than 25 cm3/g. The study highlighted that spent coffee grounds—due to the nature of their production process via roasting—can be suitable for torrefaction because of the high recovered solid yield and the high energy density. The results will be used for the development of a collection scheme for spent coffee grounds in a big municipality of Athens (Greece).

Keywords

Pyrolysis Sustainable waste management Thermogravimetric analysis Circular economy Waste valorization Mass balances 

Notes

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4919_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (121 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 120 kb)

References

  1. Acevedo F, Rubilar M, Scheuermann E, Cancino B, Uquiche E, Garces M, Inostroza K, Shene C (2013) Spent coffee grounds as a renewable source of bioactive compounds. J Biobased Mater Bio 7:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Piña G, Vergara-Castañeda HA, Dave Oomah B (2015) Spent coffee grounds: a review on current research and future prospects. Trends Food Sci Technol 45:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho D-W, Cho S-H, Song H, Kwon EE (2015) Carbon dioxide assisted sustainability enhancement of pyrolysis of waste biomass: a case study with spent coffee ground. Bioresour Technol 189:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Luca S, Ciotoli E, Biancolillo A, Bucci R, Magrì AD, Marini F (2018) Simultaneous quantification of caffeine and chlorogenic acid in coffee green beans and varietal classification of the samples by HPLC-DAD coupled with chemometrics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:28748–28759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debiagi P, Gentile G, Cuoci A, Frassoldati A, Ranzi E, Faravelli T (2018) A predictive model of biochar formation and characterization. J Anal Appl Pyrol 134:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Döhlert P, Weidauer M, Enthaler S (2016) Spent coffee ground as source for hydrocarbon fuels. J Energy Chem 25:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksen MK, Astrup TF (2019) Characterisation of source-separated, rigid plastic waste and evaluation of recycling initiatives: effects of product design and source-separation system. Waste Manage 87:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonçalves M, César Guerreiro M, de Oliveira LCA, de Castro CS (2013) A friendly environmental material: iron oxide dispersed over activated carbon from coffee husk for organic pollutants removal. J Environ Manage 127:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks AL (2018) Environmental Implications of consumer convenience: coffee as a case study. J Ind Ecol 22:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirons M, Mehrabi Z, Gonfa TA, Morel A, Gole TW, McDermott C, Boyd E, Robinson E, Sheleme D, Malhi Y, Mason J, Norris K (2018) Pursuing climate resilient coffee in Ethiopia – a critical review. Geoforum 91:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iakovleva E, Sillanpää M, Maydannik P, Liu JT, Allen S, Albadarin AB, Mangwandi C (2017) Manufacturing of novel low-cost adsorbent: Co-granulation of limestone and coffee waste. J Environ Manage 203:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibarra-Taquez HN, GilPavas E, Blatchley ER, Gómez-García M-Á, Dobrosz-Gómez I (2017) Integrated electrocoagulation-electro oxidation process for the treatment of soluble coffee effluent: optimization of COD degradation and operation time analysis. J Environ Manage 200:530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ICO - International Coffee Organization (2018) Historical data on the global coffee trade. (downloaded from: http://www.ico.org/new_historical.asp)
  14. Kim Y, Lee J, Yi H, Tsang YF, Kwon EE (2019) Investigation into role of CO2 in two-stage pyrolysis of spent coffee grounds. Bioresour Technol 272:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kopczyński M, Lasek JA, Iluk A, Zuwała J (2017) The co-combustion of hard coal with raw and torrefied biomasses (willow (Salix viminalis), olive oil residue and waste wood from furniture manufacturing). Energy 140:1316–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovalcik A, Obruca S, Marova I (2018) Valorization of spent coffee grounds: a review. Food Bioprod Process 110:104–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ktori R, Kamaterou P, Zabaniotou A (2018) Spent coffee grounds valorization through pyrolysis for energy and materials production in the concept of circular economy. Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (Part 1:27582–27,588Google Scholar
  18. Limousy L, Jeguirim M, Dutournié P, Kraiem N, Lajili M, Said R (2013) Gaseous products and particulate matter emissions of biomass residential boiler fired with spent coffee grounds pellets. Fuel 107:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu S-H, Huang Y-Y (2018) Valorization of coffee grounds to biochar-derived adsorbents for CO2 adsorption. J Clean Prod 175:354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS (2018) Bio-refinery approach for spent coffee grounds valorization. Bioresour Technol 247:1077–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Minten B, Dereje M, Engida E, Kuma T (2017) Coffee value chains on the move: evidence in Ethiopia. Food Policy, (In Press)  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.07.012, 83, 370, 383.
  22. Mussatto SI, Ballesteros LF, Martins S, Teixeira JA (2011) Extraction of antioxidant phenolic compounds from spent coffee grounds. Sep Purif Technol 83:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naga Babu A, Reddy DS, Kumar GS, Ravindhranath K, Krishna Mohan GV (2018) Removal of lead and fluoride from contaminated water using exhausted coffee grounds based bio-sorbent. J Environ Manage 218:602–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Panahi A, Tarakcioglu M, Schiemann M, Delichatsios M, Levendis YA (2018) On the particle sizing of torrefied biomass for co-firing with pulverized coal. Combust Flame 194:72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parenti A, Guerrini L, Masella P, Spinelli S, Calamai L, Spugnoli P (2014) Comparison of espresso coffee brewing techniques. J Food Process Eng 121:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patuzzi F, Mimmo T, Cesco S, Gasparella A, Baratieri M (2013) Common reeds (Phragmites australis) as sustainable energy source: experimental and modelling analysis of torrefaction and pyrolysis processes. GCB Bioenergy 5:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peres Ribeiro J, Domingos Vicente E, Gomes AP, Nunes MI, Alves C, Tarelho LAC (2017) Effect of industrial and domestic ash from biomass combustion, and spent coffee grounds, on soil fertility and plant growth: experiments at field conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:15270–15,277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponte S (2002) The ‘latte revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Dev 30:1099–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quiroga S, Suárez C, Solís JD (2015) Exploring coffee farmers’ awareness about climate change and water needs: smallholders’ perceptions of adaptive capacity. Environ Sci Policy 45:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rattan S, Parande AK, Nagaraju VD, Ghiwari GK (2015) A comprehensive review on utilization of wastewater from coffee processing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6461–6472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russell B, Mohan S, Banerjee A (2012) Coffee market liberalisation and the implications for producers in Brazil, Guatemala and India World Bank Econ. Rev. 26:514–538Google Scholar
  32. Serrano-Gómez J, López-González H, Olguín MT, Bulbulian S (2015) Carbonaceous material obtained from exhausted coffee by an aqueous solution combustion process and used for cobalt (II) and cadmium (II) sorption. J Environ Manage 156:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shemekite F, Gómez-Brandón M, Franke-Whittle IH, Praehauser B, Insam H, Fassil Assefa F (2014) Coffee husk composting: an investigation of the process using molecular and non-molecular tools. Waste Manage 34:642–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Somnuk K, Eawlex P, Prateepchaikul G (2017) Optimization of coffee oil extraction from spent coffee grounds using four solvents and prototype-scale extraction using circulation process. Agriculture and Natural Resources 51:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sotiropoulos A, Bava N, Valta K, Vakalis S, Panaretou V, Novakovic J, Malamis D (2016a) Household food waste dehydration technique as a pre-treatment method for food waste minimisation. Int. J. Environment and Waste Management 17(3/4):273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sotiropoulos A, Vourka I, Erotokritou A, Novakovic J, Valta K, Panaretou V, Vakalis S, Thanos T, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2016b) Combination of decentralized waste drying and SSF techniques for household biowaste minimization and ethanol production. Waste Manage 52:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stylianou M, Agapiou A, Omirou M, Vyrides I, Ioannides IM, Maratheftis G, Fasoula D (2018) Converting environmental risks to benefits by using spent coffee grounds (SCG) as a valuable resource. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:35776–35790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai W-T (2017) Handbook of coffee processing by-products - chapter 10: the potential of pyrolysing exhausted coffee residue for the production of biochar (edited by Charis M. Galanakis). Academic Press, pp. 299-322, ISBN 9780128112908.Google Scholar
  39. Tuntiwiwattanapun N, Monono E, Wiesenborn D, Tongcumpou C (2017) In-situ transesterification process for biodiesel production using spent coffee grounds from the instant coffee industry. Ind Crop Prod 102:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vakalis S, Sotiropoulos A, Moustakas K, Malamis D, Vekkos K, Baratieri M (2016) Characterization of hotel bio-waste by means of simultaneous thermal analysis. Waste Biomass Valori 7:649–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vakalis S, Sotiropoulos A, Moustakas K, Malamis D, Vekkos K, Baratieri M (2017) Thermochemical valorization and characterization of household bio-waste. J Environ Manage 203:648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vakalis S, Ahmad J, Heimann R, Patuzzi F, Baratieri M (2018) The case of frictional torrefaction and the effect of reflux condensation on the operation of the rotary compression unit. Bioresour Technol 268:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang H, Xu J, Sheng L (2019) Study on the comprehensive utilization of city kitchen waste as a resource in China. Energy 173:263–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yanik J, Duman G, Karlström O, Brink A (2018) NO and SO2 emissions from combustion of raw and torrefied biomasses and their blends with lignite. J Environ Manage 227:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang S, Su Y, Xu D, Zhu S, Zhang H, Liu X (2018) Effects of torrefaction and organic-acid leaching pretreatment on the pyrolysis behavior of rice husk. Energy 149:804–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Physics Group/Bioenergy and Biofuels LaboratoryFree University of Bozen–BolzanoBolzanoItaly
  2. 2.School of Chemical Engineering, Unit of Environmental Science and TechnologyNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations