Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist?

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the atmospheric carbon dioxide emission has been amplified to a great extent in Pakistan. This amplification may cause global warming, climate change, and environmental degradation in Pakistan. Consequently, ecological condition and human life may suffer in the near future from these indicated threats. Therefore, an attempt was made to test the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in case of Pakistan. The study covers the time series data over the period of 1975–2014. We employed modern econometric techniques such as Johansen co-integration, ARDL bound testing approach, and variance decomposition analysis. Results of the Johansen co-integration test show that there is a significant long-run relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and globalization. The long-run elasticities of the ARDL model show that a 1% increase in economic globalization, political globalization, and social globalization will increase carbon dioxide emissions by 0.38, 0.19, and 0.11%, respectively. Further, our findings reveal that the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis prevails an inverted U-shaped relationship between carbon dioxide emission and economic growth. Therefore, the EKC hypothesis is valid in the presence of globalization. The diagnostic test results show that the parameters of the ARDL model are credible, stable, and reliable in the current form. Finally, variance decomposition analysis displays that economic, political, and social globalization are contributing significantly to carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abas N, Khan N (2014) Carbon conundrum, climate change, CO2 capture and consumptions. J CO2 Util 8:39–48

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali S, Waqas H, Najid A (2015) Analyzing the dynamics of energy consumption, liberalization, financial development, poverty and carbon emissions in Pakistan. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 5:166–183

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37(8):3282–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aung TS, Saboori B, Rasoulinezhad E (2017) Economic growth and environmental pollution in Myanmar: an analysis of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(25):20487–20501

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brajer V, Mead RW, Xiao F (2011) Searching for an environmental Kuznets curve in China’s air pollution. China Econ Rev 22(3):383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breusch T (1978) Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Aust Econ Pap 17:334–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the con- stancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc Ser B 37(2):149–192

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carson RT, Jeon Y, McCubbin DR (1997) The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US data. Environ Dev Econ 2:433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1995) Trade and environment: a partial synthesis. Am J Agric Econ 77:765–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dean JM (2002) Testing the impact of trade liberalization on the environment: theory and evidence. Can J Econ 35:819–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diao XD, Zeng SX, Tam CM, Tam VW (2009) EKC analysis for studying economic growth and environmental quality: a case study in China. J Clean Prod 17(5):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dickey D, Fuller W (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49(4):1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Du L, Wei C, Cai S (2012) Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China:provincial panel data analysis. China Econ Rev 23:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrenfeld D (2003) Globalisation: effects on biodiversity, environment and society. Conserv Soc 1(1):99

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedacity with estimates of variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:255–276

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fereidouni HG (2013) Foreign direct investments in real FDI estate sector and CO2 emission: evidence from emerging economies. An Int J 24(4):463–476

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frankel JA (2009) Environmental effects of international trade. ​HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-006, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4481652

  21. Fried B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45(1):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F (2006) Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecol Econ 57:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gill AR, Viswanathan KK, Hassan S (2017) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and the environmental problem of the day. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1636–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Godfrey LG (1978) Testing for higher order serial correlation in regression equations when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46(6):1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 2:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. National bureau of economic research working paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge, MA

  28. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 112:353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamit-Haggar M (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: a panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Econ 34(1):358–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Haseeb A, Xia E, Baloch MA, Abbas K (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(31):31283–31296

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heil MT, Selden TM (2001) Carbon emissions and economic development: future trajectories based on historical experience. Environ Dev Econ 6(01):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jarque CM, Bera AK (1987) A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev 55:163–172

  36. Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johansen S (1988) Statistical and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration–with application to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ 52:169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Junyi S (2006) A simultaneous estimation of environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 17:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kanjilal K, Ghosh S (2013) Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Karl RT, Trenberth KE (2003) Modern global climate change. Science 302(5651):1719–1724

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kijima M, Nishide K, Ohyama A (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: a survey. J Econ Dyn Control 34(7):1187–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kočenda E, Černý (2014) A elements of time series econometrics: an applied approach. Karolinum Press. Charles University in Prague. ​Univerzita Karlova v Praze Nakladatelství Karolinum. http://www.cupress.cuni.cz

  46. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li D, Yang D (2016) Does non-fossil energy usage lower CO2 emissions? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability 8:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liddle B (2001) Free trade and the environment-development system. Ecol Econ 39:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liua X, Gerhard KH, Chenc J, Heino M (2007) Interactions between economic growth and environmental quality in Shenzhen, China’s first special economic zone. Ecol Econ 62:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lucas REB, Wheeler D, Hettige H (1992) Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960–1988. In: Low P (ed) International trade and the environment. World Bank discussion, paper 159, pp 67–87. ​http://publications.worldbank.org

  51. Malone EL (2002) Hot topics: globalization and climate change. Soc Thought Res:143–173. ​https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5192/STARV25N1-2A5.pdf?sequence=1

  52. Marrero GA (2010) Greenhouse gases emissions, growth and the energy mix in Europe. Energy Econ 32(6):1356–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McAusland C (2008) Trade, politics, and the environment: tailpipe vs. smokestack. J Environ Econ Manag 55(1):52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Meyer JW (1999) The changing cultural content of the nation-state: a world society perspective. In: Steinmetz G (ed) State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  55. Najam A, Runnalls D, Halle M (2016) Environment and globalization: five propositions 2010. The Globalization and Environment Reader, 94. ​https://www.wiley.com

  56. Narayan P (2004) Reformulating critical values for the bounds F-statistics approach to cointegration: an application to the tourism demand model for Fiji (vol. 2). Monash University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nasir M, Rehman F (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon missions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39:1857–1864

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working paper WP238. Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  60. Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate granger causality betweenCO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36:685–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ramachandra TV, Aithal BH, Sreejith K (2015) GHG footprint of major cities in India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:473–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ramsey JB (1969) Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser B 31:350–371

    Google Scholar 

  66. Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in association of southeast Asian nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46:757–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence. Background paper for the world development report. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shahbaz M, Lean H-H, Shabbir M-S (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2947–2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shahbaz M, Mutascu M, Azim P (2013a) Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013b) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013c) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shahbaz M, Kumar Tiwari A, Nasir M (2013d) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014a) Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Indic 45:622–631

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Shahbaz M, Uddin GS, Rehman I, Imran K (2014b) Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:575–586

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014c) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017a) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev 62(04):929–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Kumar M (2017b) Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New threshold analysis. Environ Model Assess 23:557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK, Hammoudeh S (2017c) Does globalisation worsen environmental quality in developed economies? Environ Model Assess:1–16. ​https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2

  83. Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Song TA, Zheng TB, Tong L (2008) An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Econ Rev 19:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25(2):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Hye QMA (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Torres R (2001) Towards a socially sustainable world economy: an analysis of the social pillars of globalization, studies on the social dimensions of globalization. International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ullah A, Khan D, Khan I, Zheng S (2018) Does agricultural ecosystem cause environmental pollution in Pakistan? Promise and menace. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(14):13938–13955

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Vincent JR (1997) Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Vollebergh HRJ, Kemfert C (2005) The role of technological change for a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):233–247

    Google Scholar 

  92. World Bank (2014) World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/country. Accessed on 4 April 2016

  93. Yu DW, Sutherland WJ, Clark C (2002) Trade versus environment. Trends Ecol Evol 17:341–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Ullah.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, D., Ullah, A. Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 15194–15208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04913-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environmental degradation
  • Environmental Kuznets curve
  • Globalization
  • Economic growth