Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 11508–11509 | Cite as

Marie Simonin, Agnès Richaume (2015) Impact of engineered nanoparticles on the activity, abundance, and diversity of soil microbial communities: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22:13710–13723

  • C. Paul NathanailEmail author
  • Paul Bardos
  • Hans-Peter Koschitzky
Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor

The above review has received wide attention since it was summarised in the July 2016 edition of the European Commission’s ‘Science for Environment Policy’. Such reviews are incredibly helpful to the wider scientific and practitioner community in distilling and evaluating relevant literature. However, given the currently contested status of engineered nanoparticles in the field of polluted groundwater remediation, the conclusions and headline message from the paper would have benefitted from a more nuanced terminology in the conclusions that more obviously emerged from the literature.

One of the contentions in this paper is that the use of nanoremediation is potentially problematic for soil functions. This assertion is made in part based on a limited set of publications about impacts of nano zero valent iron (nZVI) on denitrifiers, which the authors then extend to signify the entire nitrogen cycle. This assertion is flawed for a number of reasons. (1) nZVI use in...



  1. Comba S, Di Molfetta A, Sethi R (2011) A comparison between field applications of nano-, micro- and millimetric zero-valent iron for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. He F, Zhao DY, Paul C (2010) Field assessment of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles for in situ destruction of chlorinated solvents in source zones. Water Res 44(7):2360–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kirschling TL, Gregory KB, Minkley EG, Lowry GV, Tilton RG (2010) Impact of nanoscale zero valent iron on geochemistry and microbial populations in trichloroethylene contaminated aquifer materials. Environ Sci Technol 44(9):3474–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuang y, Zhou y, Chen z, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2013) Impact of Fe and Ni/Fe nanoparticles on biodegradation of phenol by the strain Bacillus fusiformis (BFN) at various pH values. Bioresour Technol 136:588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lacinová L, Černíková M, Hrabal J, Černík M (2013) ‘In-Situ Combination of. Ecol Chem Engineer 20:463–473Google Scholar
  6. Nathanail CP, Gillett A, Mccaffrey C, Nathanail J, Ogden R (2016) A preliminary risk assessment protocol for renegade nanoparticles deployed during nanoremediation. Remediat J 26 (3), 95–108, 2016Google Scholar
  7. Xiu Z, Jin Z, Li T, Mahendra S, Lowry GV, Alvarez PJJ (2010) Effects of nano-scale zero-valent iron particles on a mixed culture dechlorinating trichloroethylene. Bioresour Technol 101(4):1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Land Quality Management LtdNottinghamUK
  2. 2.R3 Environmental Technology Ltd and University of BrightonBrightonUK
  3. 3.University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations