Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 10835–10845 | Cite as

Health risk of metal exposure via inhalation of cigarette sidestream smoke particulate matter

  • Li-Chuan Cheng
  • Chun-Ju Lin
  • Huei-Ju Liu
  • Lih-Ann LiEmail author
Research Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Cigarette sidestream smoke particulate matter (CSSP) is a major source of airborne metals in the indoor environment. However, the health impacts of inhalation of CSSP-bound metals are rarely studied. In this study, we quantify the amount of 37 metals discharged through CSSP from a leading Taiwan brand of cigarette, Long Life. We also estimate cancer and non-cancer risks due to inhalation of these metals and investigate possible modes of toxic action. Long Life CSSP exhibits a distinctive carcinogenic metal profile compared with Western brands. When released to a 60-m3 poorly ventilated room, Long Life CSSP metals increase the risk for cancer by a 9.26 or 20.90 in a million chance and the hazard quotient for non-cancer toxicity by 0.496 or 0.286 per cigarette depending on risk estimation system. Cd accounts for more than 90% and 80% of cancer and non-cancer risk, respectively. Long Life CSSP also contains considerable amounts of Al, Ba, and Fe. Metals are not responsible for CSSP-induced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and transactivation activity of AhR, Nrf2, and ERα. However, they diminish resveratrol-activated Nrf2 activity and downstream antioxidant gene expression in low-AhR-expressing lung cells. Our results suggest that chronic exposure to Long Life CSSP elevates Cd-associated cancer and non-cancer risks. Furthermore, exposure to Long Life CSSP metals may impair Nrf2-mediated antioxidant protection.

Keywords

Cigarette sidestream smoke Particulate matter Metals Health risk Toxicity mechanisms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Lun-Cheng Kuo and Mr. Weichia Chung for technique assistance. We also thank Dr. Hong-Yo Kang for the gift of the ERE-Luc reporter.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Health Research Institutes (EO-105-PP06 and EO-106-PP06).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4257_Fig4_ESM.png (98 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1

Representative photos for CellROX Deep Red detection of ROS production in live CL1-5 cells. Cells were exposed to 0-180 μg/ml cigarette sidestream smoke particulate matter (CSSP) or equivalent amounts of constituent metal mixture (CMM) for 1 h before staining (n=6). Menadione (25 μM) was employed as a positive control. (PNG 97 kb)

11356_2019_4257_MOESM1_ESM.tif (3.2 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIF 3228 kb)

References

  1. ATSDR (2003) Toxicological profile for selenium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. ATSDR (2005) Toxicological profile for zinc. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  3. ATSDR (2007) Toxicological profile for lead. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. ATSDR (2012) Toxicological profile for vanadium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker RR (1981) Product formation mechanisms inside a burning cigarette. Prog Energy Combust Sci 7:135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behera SN, Xian H, Balasubramanian R (2014) Human health risk associated with exposure to toxic elements in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke. Sci Total Environ 472:947–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cal/OSHA (2016) Table AC-1, Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs), California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 8 Section 5155. California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell RC, Stephens WE, Finch AA, Geraki K (2014) Controls on the valence species of arsenic in tobacco smoke: XANES investigation with implications for health and regulation. Environ Sci Technol 48:3449–3456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CAPCOA (1993) The CAPCOA air toxics “hot spots” program, revised 1992, risk assessment guidelines. California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang MJ, Walker K, McDaniel RL, Connell CT (2005) Impaction collection and slurry sampling for the determination of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in sidestream cigarette smoke by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. J Environ Monit 7:1349–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng YH, Huang SC, Lin CJ, Cheng LC, Li LA (2012) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor protects lung adenocarcinoma cells against cigarette sidestream smoke particulates-induced oxidative stress. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 259:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Culotta VC, Yang M, O'Halloran TV (2006) Activation of superoxide dismutases: putting the metal to the pedal. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:747–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darbre PD (2006) Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol 26:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elbekai RH, El-Kadi AO (2004) Modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-regulated gene expression by arsenite, cadmium, and chromium. Toxicology 202:249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gondola I, Kadar I (1995) Heavy metal content of flue-cured tobacco in different growing regions of Hungary. Acta Agron Hung 43:243–251Google Scholar
  16. He X, Chen MG, Ma Q (2008) Activation of Nrf2 in defense against cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol 21:1375–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IARC (1993) Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 58. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. IARC (2004): Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 83. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. IARC (2006a): Inorganic and organic lead compounds. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 87. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. IARC (2006b): Cobalt in hard metals and cobalt sulfate, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide and vanadium pentoxide. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 86. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  21. IARC (2012a): Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 100C. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. IARC (2012b): Chemical agents and related occupations. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 100F. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCS (1992): Cadmium. Environmental Health Criteria, 134. In: International Programme on Chemical Safety. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  24. Jomova K, Valko M (2011) Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 283:65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kode A, Rajendrasozhan S, Caito S, Yang SR, Megson IL, Rahman I (2008) Resveratrol induces glutathione synthesis by activation of Nrf2 and protects against cigarette smoke-mediated oxidative stress in human lung epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 294:L478–L488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohle C, Bock KW (2007) Coordinate regulation of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the Ah receptor and Nrf2. Biochem Pharmacol 73:1853–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuo LC, Cheng LC, Lin CJ, Li LA (2013) Dioxin and estrogen signaling in lung adenocarcinoma cells with different aryl hydrocarbon receptor/estrogen receptor alpha phenotypes. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 49:1064–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuo LC, Cheng LC, Lee CH, Lin CJ, Chen PY, Li LA (2017) Estrogen and cigarette sidestream smoke particulate matter exhibit ERalpha-dependent tumor-promoting effects in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 313:L477–L490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee CH, Ko YC, Goggins W, Huang JJ, Huang MS, Kao EL, Wang HZ (2000) Lifetime environmental exposure to tobacco smoke and primary lung cancer of non-smoking Taiwanese women. Int J Epidemiol 29:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee HL, Hsieh DP, Li LA (2011) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette sidestream smoke particulates from a Taiwanese brand and their carcinogenic relevance. Chemosphere 82:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin TC, Chien SC, Hsu PC, Li LA (2006) Mechanistic study of polychlorinated biphenyl 126-induced CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 up-regulation. Endocrinology 147:1536–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin S, Lin CJ, Hsieh DP, Li LA (2012) ERalpha phenotype, estrogen level, and benzo[a]pyrene exposure modulate tumor growth and metabolism of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Lung Cancer 75:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu C, Wright CG, McAdam KG, Taebunpakul S, Heroult J, Braybrook J, Goenaga-Infante H (2012) Arsenic speciation in tobacco and cigarette smoke Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International/Contributions to Tobacco Research. 25:375–380Google Scholar
  34. Lo R, Matthews J (2013) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor and estrogen receptor alpha differentially modulate nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 transactivation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 270:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma Q (2013) Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 53:401–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marchand A, Barouki R, Garlatti M (2004) Regulation of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 gene expression by CYP1A1 activity. Mol Pharmacol 65:1029–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matthews J, Gustafsson JA (2006) Estrogen receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathways. Nucl Recept Signal 4:e016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. OEHHA (2005) Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: final report, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. California EPA, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  39. OSHA (2017) Air contaminants, 29 CFR 1910.1000. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinto E, Cruz M, Ramos P, Santos A, Almeida A (2017) Metals transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke: evidences in smokers’ lung tissue. J Hazard Mater 325:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plauth A, Geikowski A, Cichon S, Wowro SJ, Liedgens L, Rousseau M, Weidner C, Fuhr L, Kliem M, Jenkins G, Lotito S, Wainwright LJ, Sauer S (2016) Hormetic shifting of redox environment by pro-oxidative resveratrol protects cells against stress. Free Radic Biol Med 99:608–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rangasamy T, Cho CY, Thimmulappa RK, Zhen L, Srisuma SS, Kensler TW, Yamamoto M, Petrache I, Tuder RM, Biswal S (2004) Genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. J Clin Invest 114:1248–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rangasamy T, Misra V, Zhen L, Tankersley CG, Tuder RM, Biswal S (2009) Cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in A/J mice is associated with pulmonary oxidative stress, apoptosis of lung cells, and global alterations in gene expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 296:L888–L900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schick S, Glantz S (2005) Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke. Tob Control 14:396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sogor C, Gaspar A, Posta J (1998) Flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of total chromium and Cr(VI) in cigarette ash and smoke using flow injection hydraulic high-pressure sample introduction. Microchem J 58:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sorahan T, Lancashire RJ (1997) Lung cancer mortality in a cohort of workers employed at a cadmium recovery plant in the United States: an analysis with detailed job histories. Occup Environ Med 54:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taebunpakul S, Liu C, Wright C, McAdam K, Heroult J, Braybrook J, Goenaga-Infante H (2011) Determination of total arsenic and arsenic speciation in tobacco products: from tobacco leaf and cigarette smoke. J Anal At Spectrom 26:1633–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wen CP, Tsai SP, Yen DD (1994) The health impact of cigarette smoking in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Public Health 7:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Health Research InstitutesMiaoliRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations