Abstract
Agricultural farmers in developing countries are at high risk of pesticide exposure and adverse effects because of unsafe practices and inappropriate legislation. Biological monitoring is considered a useful tool for pesticide exposure assessment; however, its use is limited in developing countries due to a lack of techniques and resources such as laboratory analysis, trained staff and budgets. This study examines whether the World Health Organization predicted exposure assessment model (WHO-PEAM) is a suitable alternative tool for assessing insecticide exposure among agricultural farmers. WHO-PEAM was used to predict daily doses (PDD) of chlorpyrifos for a group of Vietnamese rice farmers using a set of exposure parameters obtained from a questionnaire survey of participant famers during a field study. These results were compared to absorbed daily doses (ADD) of chlorpyrifos for the farmers measured using a biological monitoring program, in which 24-h urine samples were collected and analysed for the chlorpyrifos metabolite, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) using LC/MS. Validation of the model results was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSR) and two-way mixed-model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean of total ADD was 20 μg/kg/day while that of total PDD was 22 μg/kg/day. The WSR test revealed no statistically significant difference in the average values of ADDT and PDDT. ICC indicated substantial agreement for both single and average measures between ADDT and PDDT (ICC, 0.62 and 0.77, respectively). The results demonstrate that a refined WHO-PEAM model can be readily used as a field method, without biological monitoring, to evaluate chlorpyrifos exposure among agricultural farmers in Vietnam and similar developing countries.

Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Aponso ML, Exposure and Assessment for Farmers Occupationally Exposed to Chlopyrifos. Annals of Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture 2002;4:233–244
Barr JR, Driskell WJ, Hill RH, Ashley DL, Needham LL, Head SL, Sampson EJ, Barr DB (1999) Strategies for biological monitoring of exposure for contemporary-use pesticides. Toxicol Ind Health 15:169–180
Cohen J, (1988) Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum
Cowles J, Penn M & Quin R (1998) Magnitude of chlorpyrifos residues in rice treated with Lorsban 30EC Insecticide in Vietnam GHF-P 1792. Dow AgroSciences. Unpublished
Curwin BD, Hein MT, Sanderson WT, Striley C, Heederil D, Kromhout H, Reynolds SJ, Alavanja AC (2007) Pesticide dose estimates for children of Iowa farmers and non-farmers. Environ Res 105:307–315
Dasgupta S, Meisner C, Wheeler D, Xuyen K, Lam NT (2007) Pesticide poisoning of farm workers-implications of blood test results from Vietnam. Int J Hyg Environ-Health 210:121–132
Dung NH 2006. The case of farmers in Rice production in the Mekong Delta Vietnam. Sub-regional conference on Proverty environment Nexus - LAO PDR
Echobion DJ (2001) Pesticide use in developing countries. Toxicology 160:27–33
Graber MA, Toth PP & Herting RL 1997. University of Iowa Family Practice Handbook. 3rd Edition Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa College of medicine
He F (1993) Biological monitoring of occupational pesticide exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:S69–S76
Hung LM (2003) Economic characteristics of population of Vietnam. Population Census Conference, Japan, p 2003
IBM CORP 2011. Released 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Jayjock MA et al (2007) Modeling framework for human exposure assessment. Journal Of Exposure Science And Environmental Epidemiology 17: p S81
Kappa-Skrzypczak L, Cyranka M, Skrzypczak M, Kruszewski M (2011) Biological and biomarlers of organophosphate pesticides exposure - state of the art. Ann Agr Environ Med 18:294–303
Konradsen F, Hoek W, Cole DC, Hutchinson G, Daisley H, Singh S, Eddleston M (2003) Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries - options for restricting the availability of pesticides. Toxicology 192:249–261
Mage DT, Allen RH, Gondy G, Smith W, Barr DB, Needham LL (2004) Estimating pesticide dose from urinary pesticide concentration data by creatinine correction in the third National Health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES-III). J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14:457–465
Maroni M, Fait A, Colosio C (1999) Risk assessment and management of occupational exposure to pesticides. Toxicol Lett 107:145–153
Murphy HH, Hoan NP, Matteson P, Abubakar ALCM (2002) Farmer's self-surveillance of pesticide poisoning: a 12-month pilot in northern Vietnam. Int J Occup Environ Health 8:201–211
Nolan RJ, Rick DL, Freshour NL, Saunders JH (1984) Chlorpyrifos: pharmacokinetics in human volunteers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 73:8–15
OECD 1997. Guidance document for teh conduct of studies of occupational exposure to pesticides during agricultural application
Phung DT, Connell D, Miller G, Chu C (2011a) Probabilistic Assessment of Chlorpyrifos Exposure to Rice Farmers in Vietnam. J Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol 22:417–423
Phung DT, Connell D, Miller G, Hodge M, Patel R, Cheng R, Abeyewardene M, Chu C (2011b) Biological monitoring of chlorpyrifos exposure to rice farmers in Vietnam. Chemosphere 87:294–300
PSD 2007. UK predictive operator exposure model (POEM): a user's guide. York, England, pesticide safety directorate. In: www.pesticides.gov.uk/approvals.asp?id=2427
US EPA 1996. Occupational and Residential Exposure Test Guidelines - Series 875
US EPA 1997. Exposure Factor Handbook, National Center for Environmnetal assessment. Office of Research and Development
Wesseling C, Mcconnell R, Partanen T, Hogstedt C (1997) Agricultural pesticide use in developing countries: health effects and research needs. Int J Health Serv 27:273–308
WHO (2011). Generic risk assessment model for indoor and outdoor space spraying of insecticides. WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2010.6. In WHO website: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20103293081
World Health Organization (1982). Field surveys of exposure to pesticides: standard protocol. World Health Organization
Funding
This research was supported by a Griffith University Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (#2640731).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical clearance
The biological monitoring program was approved for ethical clearance by Griffith University Human Research Committee (HREC) and issued with authorization to be commenced from 14/04/2009 SU Protocol Number ENV/04/09/HERC).
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phung, D., Miller, G., Connell, D. et al. Is the World Health Organization predicted exposure assessment model for space spraying of insecticides applicable to agricultural farmers?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 896–904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3701-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3701-8


