Abstract
Combining with the spatial variations in environmental technological innovation cross-province in China, this study employs the spatial econometric model to explore how environmental technological innovation responds to changes in command-and-control regulation and three other traditional determinants (the environmental R&D investments, the environmental labor force inputs, and the provincial economic development level) during the study period from 2004 to 2016.The results indicate that there is a clear sign of spatial correlation in the environmental technological innovation according to the global and local indicators of spatial association. Then, considering the spatial interdependence of environmental technological innovation and holding other variables constant, evidence shows that command-and-control regulation has a significant adverse effect on environmental technological innovation in the whole country and the Eastern region, while the effect is statistically positive in the Western region and non-significant in the Central region. We also find that the effects in two sub-periods of 2004–2010 and 2011–2016 are obvious differences because some new command-and-control regulation instruments were formulated and implemented in 2010. In addition, environmental technological innovation is also directly catalyzed by the environmental R&D investments, the environmental labor force inputs, and the provincial economic development level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angulo A, Burridge P, Mur J (2017) Testing for a structural break in the weight matrix of the spatial error or spatial lag model. Spat Econ Anal 2:161–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2016.1264620
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(5):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Anselin L, Syabri L, Kho Y (2006) GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal 38(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x
Artelaris P (2014) Local versus regime convergence regression models: a comparison of two approaches. Geo Journal 80(2):263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9551-0
Blackman A (2010) Alternative pollution control policies in developing countries. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req005
Blonigen BA, Davies RB, Waddell GR, Naughton HT (2007) FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. Eur Econ Rev 51(5):1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.08.006
Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x
Chen X, Shao S, Tian Z, Xie Z, Yin P (2017) Impacts of air pollution and its spatial spillover effect on public health based on China’s big data sample. J Clean Prod 142:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.119
Chen L, Ren C, Zhang B, Wang Z, Liu M (2018) Quantifying urban land sprawl and its driving forces in northeast china from 1990 to 2015. Sustain 10(2):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010188
Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2017) Identifying the spatial effects and driving factors of urban PM 2.5 pollution in China. Ecol Indic 82:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.043
Cole DH, Grossman PZ (1999) When is command-and-control efficient? Institutions, technology and the comparative efficiency of alternative regulatory regimes for environmental protection. Wis L Rev 887
Collins K, Babyak C, Molone J (2006) Treatment of spatial autocorrelation in geocoded crime data. Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods, pp 2864–2871
Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Arnold CA, Birgé H et al (2017) Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S.environmental law. Ecol Soc 22(2):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08983-220203
Dana DA, Wiseman HJ (2015) A market approach to regulating the energy revolution: assurance bonds, insurance, and the certain and uncertain risks of hydraulic fracturing. Northwestern Public Law Research Paper:15–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353061
Demirel P, Iatridis K, Kesidou E (2018) The impact of regulatory complexity upon self-regulation: evidence from the adoption and certification of environmental management systems. J Environ Manag 207(1):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.019
Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):24–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017603253791
Gallo JL, Kamarianakis Y (2010) The evolution of regional productivity disparities in the European Union from1975 to 2002: a combination of shift–share and spatial econometrics. Reg Stud 45(1):123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903234662
Getis A, Ord JK (2010) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Am Econ Rev 24(3):189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
Greenstone M, Hanna R (2014) Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3038–3072. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3038
Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1984) Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 339–374
Guo LL, Qu Y, Tseng ML (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.210
Hahn RW, Stavins RN (1992) Economic incentives for environmental protection: integrating theory and practice. Am Econ Rev 82(2):464–468
Hao Y, Liu YM (2016) The influential factors of urban PM2.5 concentrations in China: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 112:1443–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.005
Helfand BP, Berck P (2018) The theory and practice of command and control in environmental policy. Routledge 2 Park Square Militon Park, New York, USA
Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res policy 37(1):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
Hotte L, Winer SL (2012) Environmental regulation and trade openness in the presence of private mitigation. J Dev Econ 97(2):46–57. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1231422
Iraldo F, Testa F, Melis M, Frey M (2011) A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness. Environmental Policy and Governance 21(3):210–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.568
Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit 33(1):132–163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2728912
Kasemsap K (2017) Environmental management and waste management: principles and applications. Ethics and Sustainability in Global Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2036-8.ch002
Kolstad CD (1986) Empirical properties of economic incentives and command-and-control regulations for air pollution control. Land Econ 62(3):250–268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3146390
Korhonen J, Pätäri S, Toppinen A, Tuppura A (2015) The role of environmental regulation in the future competitiveness of the pulp and paper industry: the case of the sulfur emissions directive in northern Europe. J Clean Prod 108:864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.003
Kriechel B, Ziesemer T (2009) The environmental porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption. Econ Innov New Technol 18(3):267–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590801943235
Lanoie P, Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S (2010) The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? CIRANO-Scientific Publications 2010s-29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1682001
Lloyd CD (2010) Local models for spatial analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Long R, Shao T, Chen H (2016) Spatial econometric analysis of China’s province-level industrial carbon productivity and its influencing factors. Appl Energy 166:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.100
Managi S, Jena PR (2008) Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecol Econ 65(2):432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.011
Miao CL, Fang DB, Sun LY, Luo QL (2017) Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.019
Ou J, Liu X, Li X, Chen Y (2013) Quantifying the relationship between urban forms and carbon emissions using panel data analysis. Landscape Ecol 28(0):1889–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9943-4
Paci R, Usai S (1999) Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation. Geo J 49(4):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007192313098
Pan X, Ai B, Li C, Pan X, Yan Y (2017) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.012
Pargal S, Wheeler D (1999) Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 106(6):1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.1086/262061
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995a) Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995b) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73(5):120–134
Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116
Requate T, Unold W (2003) Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology. Eur Econ Rev 47(1):125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00188-5
Shi X, Xu Z (2018) Environmental regulation and firm exports: evidence from the eleventh five-year plan in China. J Environ Econ Manag 89:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.003
Stavins RN, Whitehead BW (1996) The next generation of market-based environmental policies. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Sterner T, Turnheim B (2009) Innovation and diffusion of environmental technology: industrial NOx abatement in Sweden under refunded emission payments. Ecol Econ 68(12):2996–3006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.028
Testa F, Iraldo F, Frey M (2011) The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. J Environ Manag 92(9):2136–2144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.578678
Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(sup1):234–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
Walker H, Sisto LD, McBain D (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purch Supply Manag 14(1):69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.007
Wang R, Cheng J, Zhu Y, Lu P (2017) Evaluation on the coupling coordination of resources and environment carrying capacity in Chinese mining economic zones. Resources Policy 53:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.05.012
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editors as well as the two anonymous referees for their comments.
Funding
We also acknowledge financial support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 17BGL204) and the Philosophy & Social Science Project of Heilongjiang Province (No. 16JYB04).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 37 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Gu, Y., Liu, F. et al. The effect of command-and-control regulation on environmental technological innovation in China: a spatial econometric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 34789–34800 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3678-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3678-3