Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 36, pp 36518–36529 | Cite as

Lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain 32a as promising biocontrol compounds against the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens

  • Dorra Ben Abdallah
  • Slim Tounsi
  • Houda Gharsallah
  • Adnane Hammami
  • Olfa Frikha-GargouriEmail author
Research Article


Despite the potential biological importance of lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as antimicrobial compounds, their effects on Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms have not been previously studied. These latter are important virulence factors for the development and re-occurrence of crown gall disease. As part of the development of a new biopesticide acting as anti-biofilm and biocontrol agent, we investigated for the first time the ability of a mixture of lipopeptides produced by B. amyloliquefaciens strain 32a to inhibit the tumor formation on plants and to reduce the formation of biofilms by the phytopathogenic A. tumefaciens strains C58 and B6. The mixture was found to display a strong biosurfactant activity as well as bactericidal activity against planktonic Agrobacterium cells. Moreover, the lipopeptide treatment inhibited biofilm formation in the range of 79.58 ± 0.60–100.00 ± 0.00% and dislodged 43.42 ± 0.91–93.89 ± 2.70% of preformed biofilm. For these assays, fluorescence microscopy did not show any adherent cell in the anti-adhesive assay and only few ones in the cell-dislodging assay. More importantly, lipopeptide-enriched extract inhibits tumor formation on tomato stem when treatments were applied after pathogen adhesion to wounded tissues. By virtue of its ability to inhibit biofilms formed on biotic and abiotic surfaces and to control efficiently tumor development, the 32a lipopeptide mixture may represent an excellent new tool for an efficient biocontrol of crown gall disease.


Agrobacterium tumefaciens Biosurfactants Lipopeptides Antibacterial Biofilm inhibition Biological control Crown gall disease 



This work was supported by grants from the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. We would like to thank Prof. Hai Ping Cheng and Prof. Raman Penyalver for kindly providing us with the pHC60 vector and the C58 (pHC60) GFP-labeled strain respectively.


  1. Abarca-Grau AM, Penyalver R, Lopez MM, Marco-Noales E (2011) Pathogenic and non-pathogenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens, A. rhizogenes and A. vitis strains form biofilms on abiotic as well as on root surfaces. Plant Pathol 60:416–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abarca-Grau AM, Burbank LP, De Paz HD, Crespo-Rivas JC, Marco-Noales E, López MM, Vinardell JM, von Bodman SB, Penyalver R (2012) Role for Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 cell envelope polysaccharides in surface interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(6):1644–1651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahimou F, Jacques P, Deleu M (2000) Surfactin and iturin A effects on Bacillus subtilis surface hydrophobicity. Enzym Microb Technol 27:749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayed B, Jridi M, Maalej H, Nasri M, Hmidet N (2014) Characterization and stability of biosurfactant produced by Bacillus mojavensis A21 and its application in enhancing solubility of hydrocarbon. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:1007–1014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben Abdallah D, Frikha-Gargouri O, Tounsi S (2015) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain 32a as a source of lipopeptides for biocontrol of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains. J Appl Microbiol 119:196–207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben Abdallah D, Frikha-Gargouri O, Tounsi S (2018) Rizhospheric competence, plant growth promotion and biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum strain 32a. Biol Control 124:61–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biniarz P, Baranowska G, Feder-Kubis J, Krasowska A (2015) The lipopeptides pseudofactin II and surfactin effectively decrease Candida albicans adhesion and hydrophobicity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108:343–353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borriss R (2015) Towards a new generation of commercial microbial disease control and plant growth promotion products. In: Lugtenberg B (ed) Principles of plant-microbe interactions. Springer, Cham, pp 329–337Google Scholar
  9. Cawoy H, Debois D, Franzil L, De Pauw E, Thonart P, Ongena M (2015) Lipopeptides as main ingredients for inhibition of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus subtilis/amyloliquefaciens. Microb Biotechnol 8:281–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng HP, Walker GC (1998) Succinoglycan is required for initiation and elongation of infection threads during nodulation of alfalfa by Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol 180:5183–5191Google Scholar
  11. Chrzanowski L, Lawniczak L, Czaczyk K (2012) Why do microorganisms produce rhamnolipids? World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper DG, Goldenberg BG (1987) Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:224–229Google Scholar
  13. De Araujo LV, Abreu F, Lins U, Santa Anna LMDM, Nitschke M, Freire DMG (2011) Rhamnolipid and surfactin inhibit Listeria monocytogenes adhesion. Food Res Int 44:481–488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deravel J, Lemière S, Coutte F, Krier F, Van Hese N, Béchet M, Sourdeau N, Höfte M, Leprêtre A, Jacques P (2014) Mycosubtilin and surfactin are efficient, low ecotoxicity molecules for the biocontrol of lettuce downy mildew. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6255–6264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. du Noüy PL (1925) An interfacial tensiometer for universal use. J Gen Physiol 7:625–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eloff JN (1998) A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Med 64:711–713. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frikha-Gargouri O, Ben Abdallah D, Ghorbel I, Charfeddine I, Jlaiel L, Triki MA, Tounsi S (2017) Lipopeptides from a novel Bacillus methylotrophicus 39b strain suppress Agrobacterium crown gall tumours on tomato plants. Pest Manag Sci 73:568–574. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu KB, Zhang DJ, Cheng G, Xu JH, Li SL, Shen GM, Luo YC, Li YG (2017) Safe antifungal lipopeptides derived from Bacillus marinus B-9987 against grey mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. J Integr Agric 16:1999–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammami I, Rhouma A, Jaouadi B, Rebai A, Nesme X (2009) Optimization and biochemical characterization of a bacteriocin from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain 14B for biocontrol of Agrobacterium spp. strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:253–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heindl JE, Wang Y, Heckel BC, Mohari B, Feirer N, Fuqua C (2014) Mechanisms and regulation of surface interactions and biofilm formation in Agrobacterium. Front Plant Sci 5:176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C (2012) Inhibition and dispersal of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms by a small diffusible Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproduct(s). Arch Microbiol 194(6):391–403. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Höfgen R, Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 16:9877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones DA, Ryder MH, Clare BG, Stephen K, Kerr FA (1988) Construction of a Tra- deletion mutant of pAgK84 to safeguard the biological control of crown gall. Mol Gen Genet 212:207–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim PI, Ryu J, Kim YH, Chi YT (2010) Production of biosurfactant lipopeptides Iturin A, fengycin and surfactin A from Bacillus subtilis CMB32 for control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:138–145Google Scholar
  25. Lai CC, Huang YC, Wei YH, Chang JS (2009) Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 167:609–614. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Makovitzki A, Avrahami D, Shai Y (2006) Ultrashort antibacterial and antifungal lipopeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15997–16002. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mandal SM, Barbosa AE, Franco OL (2013) Lipopeptides in microbial infection control: scope and reality for industry. Biotechnol Adv 31:338–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mihalache G, Balaes T, Gostin I, Stefan M, Coutte F, Krier F (2017) Lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis as new biocontrol products against fusariosis in ornamental plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–10Google Scholar
  29. Mnif I, Ghribi D (2015) Review lipopeptides biosurfactants: mean classes and new insights for industrial, biomedical, and environmental applications. Biopolymers 104:129–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moryl M, Spętana M, Dziubek K, Paraszkiewicz K, Różalska S, Płaza GA, Różalski A (2015) Antimicrobial, antiadhesive and antibiofilm potential of lipopeptides synthesised by Bacillus subtilis, on uropathogenic bacteria. Acta Biochim Pol 62:725–732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nihorimbere V, Cawoy H, Seyer A, Brunelle A, Thonart P, Ongena M (2012) Impact of rhizosphere factors on cyclic lipopeptide signature from the plant beneficial strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S499. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79:176–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nitschke M, Araújo LV, Costa SG, Pires RC, Zeraik AE, Fernandes AC, Freire DM, Contiero J (2009) Surfactin reduces the adhesion of food-borne pathogenic bacteria to solid surfaces. Lett Appl Microbiol 49:241–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penalver R, Serra MT, Duran-Vila LMM (1996) Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens B6 and A. radiobacter K84 to tomato root tips. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3530–3534Google Scholar
  34. Penyalver R, Oger PM, Su S, Alvarez B, Salcedo CI, López MM, Farrand SK (2009) The S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase gene ahcY of Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84 is required for optimal growth, antibiotic production and biocontrol of crown gall disease. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 22:713–724. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pertot I, Puopolo G, Hosni T, Pedrotti L, Jourdan E, Ongena M (2013) Limited impact of abiotic stress on surfactin production in planta and on disease resistance induced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S499 in tomato and bean. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86:505–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raaijmakers JM, Bruijn I, Nybroe O, Ongena M (2010) Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:1037–1062. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rautela R, Singh AK, Shukla A, Cameotra SS (2014) Lipopeptides from Bacillus strain AR2 inhibits biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105:809–821. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rhouma A, Borui M, Boubaker A, Nesme X (2008) Potential effect of rhizobacteria in the management of crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens bivor1. J Plant Pathol 90:517–526Google Scholar
  39. Rivardo F, Turner RJ, Allegrone G, Ceri H, Martinotti MG (2009) Anti-adhesion activity of two biosurfactants produced by Bacillus spp. prevents biofilm formation of human bacterial pathogens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:541–553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Pérez-García A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:430–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roongsawang N, Washio K, Morikawa M (2011) Diversity of nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the biosynthesis of lipopeptide biosurfactants. Int J Mol Sci 12:141–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruggeri C, Fransetti A, Bestetti G, Caredda P, La Colla P, Pintus M, Sergi S, Tamburini E (2009) Isolation and characterisation of surface active compound-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated environments. Int Biodeter biodegr 63:936–942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis TA (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  44. Sardi JC, Scorzoni L, Bernardi T, Fusco-Almeida AM, Mendes Giannini MJ (2013) Candida species: current epidemiology, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, natural antifungal products and new therapeutic options. J Med Microbiol 62:10–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shekhar S, Sundaramanickam A, Balasubramanian T (2015) Biosurfactant producing microbes and their potential applications: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:1522–1554. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slimene IB, Tabbene O, Djebali N, Cosette P, Schmitter JM, Jouenne T, Urdaci MC, Limam F (2012) Putative use of a Bacillus subtilis L194 strain for biocontrol of Phoma medicaginis in Medicago truncatula seedlings. Res Microbiol 163:388–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stockwell VO, Kawalek MD, Moore LW, Loper JE (1996) Transfer of pAgK84 from the biocontrol agent Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 to A. tumefaciens under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Straight PD, Willey JM, Kolter R (2006) Interactions between Streptomyces coelicolor and Bacillus subtilis: role of surfactants in raising aerial structures. J Bacteriol 188:4918–4925. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomlinson AD, Fuqua C (2009) Mechanisms and regulation of polar surface attachment in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:708–714. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walencka E, Różalska S, Sadowska B, Rózalska B (2008) The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived surfactants on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation. Folia Microbiol 53(1):61–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weller SA, Stead DE, Young JPW (2005) Induction of root-mat symptoms on cucumber plants by Rhizobium, but not by Ochrobactrum or Sinorhizobium, harbouring a cucumopine Ri plasmid. Plant Pathol 54:799–805. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wimpenny JWT, Colasanti T (1997) A unifying hypothesis for the structure of microbial biofilm based on cellular automaton models. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 22:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuan J, Zhao M, Li R, Huang Q, Rensing C, Shen Q (2017) Lipopeptides produced by B. amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 altered the soil fungal community and non-ribosomal peptides genes harboring microbial community. Appl Soil Ecol 117:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zeriouh H, Romero D, Garcia-Gutierrez L, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A, Perez-Garcia A (2011) The iturin-like lipopeptides are essential components in the biological control arsenal of Bacillus subtilis against bacterial diseases of cucurbits. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24:1540–1552. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang Q, Cai W, Wang J (2008) Stimulatory effects of biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa BSZ-07 on rice straw decomposing. J Environ Sci 20:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorra Ben Abdallah
    • 1
  • Slim Tounsi
    • 1
  • Houda Gharsallah
    • 2
  • Adnane Hammami
    • 2
  • Olfa Frikha-Gargouri
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Biopesticides laboratory, Centre of Biotechnology of SfaxSfax UniversitySfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Microbiology, Research Laboratory “MPH,” Habib Bourguiba University Hospital of SfaxSfax UniversitySfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations