Skip to main content
Log in

Pesticide residues in Indian raw honeys, an indicator of environmental pollution

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Honey has multifaceted beneficial properties, but polluted environment and unapproved apicultural practices have led to its contamination. In this study, QuEChERS method followed by chromatographic analysis by GC-μECD/FTD and GC-MS was validated and used for determination of 24 pesticides in 100 raw honey samples from various floral origins of Northern India. Matrix-matched calibrations showed that the method was selective and linear (r2 > 0.99) with detection limit < 9.1 ng g−1 for all the studied pesticides except for monocrotophos (21.3 ng g−1). The average recoveries at different fortification levels ranged from 86.0 to 107.7% with relative standard deviation < 20%. Pesticide residues were detected in 19.0% samples, and most prevalent compounds detected were dichlorvos in 6.0% samples followed by monocrotophos (5.0%), profenofos (5.0%), permethrin (4.0%), ethion (3.0%), and lindane (3.0%) with concentrations ranging from 58.8 to 225.5, from 96.0 to 430.1, from 14.6 to 43.2, from 27.8 to 39.6, from 25.6 to 28.0, and from 19.6 to 99.2 ng g−1, respectively. Honey samples originating from cotton, sunflower, and mustard crops (33.3%) that tested positive for pesticide residues were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the honey originating from natural and fruity vegetation (13.5%). Therefore, considering the contamination of environmental compartments due to extensive application of pesticides in the study area and their potential for subsequent transfer to honey by the expeditious bees, the results of present study proclaim that honey may be used as an indicator of environmental pollution. Further, estimated daily intakes of all contaminants were found to be at levels well below their acceptable daily intakes suggesting that consumption of honeys at current levels does not pose deleterious effects on human health. However, precautionary measures should always be taken considering the customary honey feeding in infants and cumulative effect of these chemicals in the foreseeable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Shaara HF (2014) The foraging behaviour of honey bees, Apis mellifera: a review. Vet Med 59:1): 1–1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliferis KA, Tarantilis PA, Harizanis PC, Alissandrakis E (2010) Botanical discrimination and classification of honey samples applying gas chromatography/mass spectrometry fingerprinting of headspace volatile compounds. Food Chem 121(3):856–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ananda GSR, Somashekar RK (2012) Evaluation of pesticide residues in farmgate samples of vegetables in Karnataka, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89(3):626–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Tajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2016) State-wise estimated demand of chemical pesticides during 2011-12 to 2015-16 & projected demand for 2016-17. Directorate of plant protection, quarantine & storage, Government of India. Available at: http://ppqs.gov.in/PMD%20Old.htm. Accessed 3 Feb 2017

  • AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemist) (2007) AOAC official method 2007.01: pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate. AOAC Int, Gaithersburg Available at: http://www.weber.hu/PDFs/QuEChERS/AOAC_2007_01.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Balayiannis G, Balayiannis P (2008) Bee honey as an environmental bioindicator of pesticides’ occurrence in six agricultural areas of Greece. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 55(3):462–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-007-9126-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barakat AMA, Badawy H, Salama E, Attallah E, Maatook G (2007) Simple and rapid method of analysis for determination of pesticide residues in honey using dispersive solid phase extraction and GC determination. J Food Agric Environ 5(2):97–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barganska Ż, Ślebioda M, Namieśnik J (2014) Determination of pesticide residues in honeybees using modified QUEChERS sample work-up and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Molecules 19(3):2911–2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19032911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi JS, Gill JPS, Aulakh RS, Kaur P (2016) Occurrence and spatial distribution of pesticide residues in butter and ghee (clarified butter fat) in Punjab (India). Environ Monit Assess 188(2):100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5115-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat BA, Bhat IA, Vishwakarma S, Verma A, Saxena GA (2012) Comparative study on the toxicity of a synthetic pesticide, dichlorvos and a neem based pesticide, neem-on to Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Curr World Environ 7(1):157–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco C, Fernández M, Pena A, Lino C, Silveira MI, Font G, Picó Y (2003) Assessment of pesticide residues in honey samples from Portugal and Spain. J Agric Food Chem 51(27):8132–8138. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034870m

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission) (2001) Revised codex standard for honey. Codex Alimentarius 12-1981:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahal KK, Kumar A, Kataria D, Singh T, Chadha BK (2016) Dynamics of demand and consumption of pesticides in agriculture-an overview. Indian J Econ Dev 12(1):171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Kumar M, Mahindrakar AN, Shinde LP (2014) Effect of washing on residues of chlorpyrifos and monocrotophos in vegetables. Int J Adv Res 2:744–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary A, Sharma DC (2008) Pesticide residues in honey samples from Himachal Pradesh (India). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80(5):417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9426-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou DL, Kanari P, Kourouzidou O, Constantinou M, Hadjiloizou P, Kika K, Constantinou P (2015) Pesticide residues analysis in honey using ethyl acetate extraction method: validation and pilot survey in real samples. Int J Environ Anal Chem 95(10):894–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2015.1070408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Pinho GP, Neves AA, de Queiroz MELR, Silvério FO (2010) Optimization of the liquid–liquid extraction method and low temperature purification (LLE–LTP) for pesticide residue analysis in honey samples by gas chromatography. Food Control 21(10):1307–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debayle D, Dessalces G, Grenier-Loustalot MF (2008) Multi-residue analysis of traces of pesticides and antibiotics in honey by HPLC-MS-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 391(3):1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2003-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deka SC, Barman N, Baruah AALH (2004) Monitoring of pesticide residues in honey samples of Jorhat district, Assam, (India). Pestic Res J 16(1):83–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2005) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending council directive 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of European Communities L 70/1-L 70/16. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32005R0396. Accesses 13 Aug 2017

  • EC (European Commission) (2016) Document number SANTE/11945/2015. Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_mrl_guidelines_wrkdoc_11945.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2017

  • Eggen RIL, Behra R, Burkhardt-Holm P, Escher BI, Schweigert N (2004) Challenges in ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Technol 38(3):59A–64A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIC (Export Inspection Council) (2013) EIC’s residue monitoring plan (RMP) 2013–14.EIC/RMP/HN/2013–14,Rev 0. Available at: http://www.eicindia.gov.in/Services/Pre-Compliance/RMP-2013-14-HONEY.pdf Accessed 27 July 2018

  • Erdoğrul Ö (2007) Levels of selected pesticides in honey samples from Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Food Control 18(7):866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.05.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez M, Picó Y, Mañes J (2002) Analytical methods for pesticide residue determination in bee products. J Food Prot 65(9):1502–1511. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-65.9.1502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harinathareddy A, Prasad NBL, Devi LK (2014) Pesticide residues in vegetable and fruit samples from Andhra Pradesh, India. J Biol Chem Research 31:1005–1015

  • ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation) (2005) Harmonised tripartite guideline validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1)

  • Irungu J, Raina S, Torto B (2016) Determination of pesticide residues in honey: a preliminary study from two of Africa’s largest honey producers. Int J Food Contam 3(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-016-0036-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortenkamp A (2007) Ten years of mixing cocktails: a review of combination effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 115:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujawski MW, Barganska Z, Marciniak K, Miedzianowska E, Kujawski JK, Slebioda M, Namiesnik J (2014) Determining pesticide contamination in honey by LC-ESI-MS/MS- comparison of pesticide recoveries of two liquid-liquid extraction based approaches. LWT Food Sci Technol 56:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gill JPS, Bedi JS, Manav M, Ansari MJ, Walia GS (2018) Sensorial and physicochemical analysis of Indian honeys for assessment of quality and floral origins. Food Res Int 108:571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kaushik G, Villarreal-Chiu JF (2016) Scenario of organophosphate pollution and toxicity in India: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(10):9480–9491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6294-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari B, Madan VK, Kathpal TS (2008) Status of insecticide contamination of soil and water in Haryana. India Environ Monit Assess 136(1):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9679-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laetz CA, Baldwin DH, Collier TK, Hebert V, Stark JD, Scholz NL (2009) The synergistic toxicity of pesticide mixtures: implications for risk assessment and the conservation of endangered pacific salmon. Environ Health Persp 117(3):348–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalhmangaihi R, Laha RC (2017) Beekeeping: a nature eco-friendly business. In: Lalchhandama K (ed) Science and technology for shaping future of Mizorum-Proceedings of the Mizorum Science Congress. Allied Publishers, New Delhi, pp 35–39 ISBN: 976-93-85926-49.5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lari SZ, Khan NA, Gandhi KN, Meshram TS, Thacker NP (2014) Comparison of pesticide residues in surface water and ground water of agriculture intensive areas. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhat FM, Haggag MN, Loutfy NM, Osman MAM, Ahmed MT (2015) Residues of organochlorine and synthetic pyrethroid pesticides in honey, an indicator of ambient environment, a pilot study. Chemosphere 120:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell EAD, Mulhauser B, Mulot M, Mutabazi A, Glauser G, Aebi A (2017) A worldwide survey of neonicotinoids in honey. Science 358:109–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal S, Kaur G, Vishwakarma GS (2014) Effects of environmental pesticides on the health of rural communities in the Malwa region of Punjab, India: a review. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 20(2):366–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2013.788972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monosson E (2005) Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment. Environ Health Perspect 113:383–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin CA, Frazier M, Frazier JL, Ashcraft S, Simonds R, vanEngelsdorp D, Pettis JS (2010) High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health. PLoS One 5(3):e9754. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naccari C, Macaluso A, Giangrosso G, Naccari F, Ferrantelli V (2014) Risk assessment of heavy metals and pesticides in honey from Sicily (Italy). J Food Res 3(2):107. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v3n2p107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaf HA, Yadav GS, Kumari B (2015) Validation and monitoring of pesticide residues in honey using QuEChERS and gas chromatographic analysis. J Apic Res 54(3):260–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2016.1143693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBB (National Bee Board) (2017) Minutes of meeting to discuss details for developing data base for beekeeping and honey production in the country. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare (DAC & FW), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Govt of India vide F. No. 20-5/2008-NBB. Available at: http://nbb.gov.in/pdf/15022017.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2017

  • Panseri S, Catalano A, Giorgi A, Arioli F, Procopio A, Britti D, Chiesa LM (2014) Occurrence of pesticide residues in Italian honey from different areas in relation to its potential contamination sources. Food Control 38:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porrini C, Gloria Sabatini A, Girotti S, Ghini S, Medrzycki P, Grillenzoni F, Bortolotti L, Gattavecchia E, Celli G (2003) Honey bees and bee products as monitors of the environmental contamination. Apiacta 38:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybyowski P, Wilczyńska A (2001) Honey as an environmental marker. Food Chem 74(3):289–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00153-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh BK, Selvanayagam M (2015) Pesticides pollution in water, sediment and fishes of Kolavai lake in Chengalpet, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Chemical Concepts 1:9–14

  • Rather IA, Koh WY, Paek WK, Lim J (2017) The sources of chemical contaminants in food and their health implications. Front Pharmacol 8:830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rissato SR, Galhiane MS, de Almeida MV, Gerenutti M, Apon BM (2007) Multiresidue determination of pesticides in honey samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and application in environmental contamination. Food Chem 101(4):1719–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Gupta VK, Kumar A, Sharma B (2017) Synergistic effects of heavy metals and pesticides in living systems. Front Chem 5:70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh C, Venkataramegowda S (2015) Organochlorine residues in bees and hive products in Karnataka. Int J Sci Res 4(5):1954–1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari R, Karnatak AK, Kale SP (2009) Pesticide residue analysis of fresh and stored honey of Tarai region of Uttarakhand (India) using multi-residue analysis method. Pant J Res 7(1):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsipi D, Triantafyllou M, Hiskia A (1999) Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in honey, applying solid phase extraction with RP-C18 material. Analyst 124(4):473–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilca F, Correia-Oliveira M, Marques R, Leal P, Monteiro S, Zanardi O, Carlos Marchini L, Luiz Tornisielo V (2012) Quechers approach for the determination of seven pesticide residues in Brazilian honey samples using GC-μECD. J Food Sci Eng 2:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO and FAO (2016) Pesticide residues in food 2016. Report of the joint meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 229. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Report2016/JMPR_2016_Report_full.pdf. Accsessed 13 Sept 2017

  • Wiest L, Buleté A, Giroud B, Fratta C, Amic S, Lambert O, Pouliquen H, Arnaudguilhem C (2011) Multi-residue analysis of 80 environmental contaminants in honeys, honeybees and pollens by one extraction procedure followed by liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A 1218(34):5743–5756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.06.079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz H, Guler GO, Aktumsek A, Cakmak YS, Ozparlak H (2010) Determination of some organochlorine pesticide residues in honeys from Konya, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 168:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1111-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab (India) for providing the funds to carry out the present research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 308 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Gill, J.P.S., Bedi, J.S. et al. Pesticide residues in Indian raw honeys, an indicator of environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 34005–34016 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3312-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3312-4

Keywords

Navigation