Abstract
The objective of this study was to summarize the grain size data from 1993 to 2016 from California water bodies and determine the number and percent of sites where sediment samples are primarily depositional sediment (more than 50% silt/clay) or non-depositional sediment (less than 50% silt/clay). Fine grain depositional areas were of interest because these are areas where hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) can accumulate if sources exist. Trends analysis of percent silt/clay data were conducted for all nine California Water Board Regions if adequate data for this type of analysis were available. Sediment sampling protocols were reviewed for all the grain size measurements to determine if depositional areas were targeted or random sampling was conducted. Twelve of the 13 sediment sampling protocols targeted depositional areas. Based on 23 years of data from 685 sites (1859 observations) in all 9 California Regions, the summary analysis showed that only 58% of the sites were considered depositional areas even when targeted sampling for depositional areas was used. Since only slightly more than half the sites were reported as depositional areas based on sampling that targets depositional areas, these results would certainly suggest that depositional areas are not dominant. In fact, for the one protocol where random sampling was used, depositional areas were not reported to be dominant. From an ecological risk perspective, the implication of this finding is that HOCs would not be expected to accumulate in the dominant type of sediment found in most California waterbodies. Trends analysis of percent silt/clay data showed mixed results for the various California Regions.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan IJ, House WA. Parker A, Carter JE (2005) Diffusion of the synthetic pyrethroid permethrin into bed sediment. Environ Sci Technol 39:523–530
Blake WH, Walsh RPD, Barnsley MJ, Palmer G, Dyrynda P, James JG (2003) Heavy metals concentrations during storm events in a rehabilitated industrialized catchment. Hydrol Process 17:1923–1939
Bloomberg (2015). http://www.bloomberg.com/news/article/2015-01-16/brown-s-california-overtakes-brazil-with-companies-leading-world. Accessed 28 Jan 2015
Fojut TL, Young TM (2011) Pyrethroid sorption to Sacramento River suspended solids and bed sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:787–792
Foster IDL, Collins AL, Naden PS, Sear DA, Jones JL (2011) Paleolimnology, policy, and practice: the potential for lake sediment based reconstructions to determine modern background sediment delivery to rivers. J Paleolimnol 45:287–360
Ghosh U, Gillette JS, Luthy RG, Zare RN (2000) Microscale location, characterization, and association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on harbor sediment particles. Environ Sci Technol 34:1729–1736
Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1992) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologist. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD (2014) Relationship of bifenthrin sediment concentrations to grain size and total organic carbon in California waterbodies: implications for ecological risk. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 93:764–768
Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD (2012) Historical trends analysis of 2004 to 2009 toxicity and pesticide data for California’s Central Valley. J Environ Sci Health A 47:801–811
Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD, Killen WD (2012) Mapping the spatial extent of depositional areas in agricultural, urban, and residential California streams. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18:368–392
Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD (2017) Grain size analysis of California waterbodies for determining the spatial extent of depositional areas. Report for FMC Agricultural Products prepared by the University of Maryland. Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown
Hall LW Jr, Anderson RD, Killen WD (2013) Mapping of depositional and non-depositional areas in Salinas, California streams with concurrent pyrethroid and benthic macroinvertebrate assessments. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 48:1–13
Karickofff SW, Brown DS, Scott TA (1979) Sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments. Water Res 13:241–248
McLeod AI, Hipel KW, Bodo BA (1991) Trends analysis methodology for water quality time series. Environmetrics 2:169–200
Nichols MM, Johnson GH, Peebles PC (1991) Modern sediments and facies model for a microtidal coastal plain estuary, the James River, Virginia. J Sediment Petrol 61:883–899
Owens PN, Batalla RJ, Collins AJ, Gomez B, Hicks DM, Horowitz AJ, Kondolf GM, Marden M, Page MJ, Peacock DH, Petticrew EL, Salmons W (2005) Fine grain sediments in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Res Appl 21:693–717
Owens PN, Walling DE (2002) The phosphorus content on fluvial sediment in rural and industrialized river basins. Water Res 36:685–701
Pierard C, Budzinski H, Garrigues R (1996) Grain size distribution of polychlorobiphenyls in coastal sediment. Environ Sci Technol 30:2776–2783
Puckett M (2002) Quality assurance management plan for the state of California’s surface water ambient monitoring program. Report prepared by California State Water Resources Control Board. Division of Water Quality, Sacramento
Siegler K, Phillips BM, Anderson BS, Voorhees JP, Tjeerdema RS (2015) Temporal and spatial trends in sediment contaminants associated with toxicity in California watersheds. Environ Pollut 206:1–6
Solomons W, Forstner U (1984) Metals in the hydrocycle. Springer-Verlag, New York
Trimble SW (1983) A sediment budget for Coon Creek, driftless area, Wisconsin. 1853-1977. Am J Sci 283:454–474
Walling DE, Fang D (2003) Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob Plan Clim Change 39:111–126
Wolman MG, Schick AP (1967) Effects of construction on fluvial sediment: urban and suburban areas of Maryland. Water Resour Res 6:1312–1326
Funding
We acknowledge FMC Agricultural Products for sponsoring this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, L.W., Anderson, R.D. Grain size analysis of California waterbodies to determine the spatial extent and temporal trends of depositional areas where hydrophobic organic compounds could accumulate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 32802–32810 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3285-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3285-3


