Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of a dry filter for dust removal under laboratory conditions in comparison to practical use at a laying hen barn

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high amount of particulate matter from poultry houses in the exhaust air, especially at different types of laying hen barns, is the main challenge farmers are faced with concerning emissions. As a possibility for the mitigation of particulate matter in the outgoing air, a dry filter based on the principle of centrifugal force was investigated under laboratory and field conditions. Aerosol spectrometers were used for continuous measurements in raw and clean gas. Field experiments took place under summer and winter conditions, so that filter efficiency under different climate conditions could be compared and measurement values at the barn were continuously collected over 24-h periods. Data collected under laboratory conditions showed a high efficiency of the dry filter, whereas results of the field experiments differed in each size fraction of the particulate matter. These differences may be explained by the fact that under laboratory conditions, better circumstances for correct measuring were created, e.g., laminar flow of the air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Burkart J, Steiner G, Reischl G, Moshammer H, Neuberger M, Hitzenberger R (2010) Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters (Grimm OPC1.108 and OPC1.109) under urban aerosol conditions. J Aerosol Sci 41:953–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambra-López M, Torres AG, Aarnink A, Ogink N (2011) Source analysis of fine and coarse particulate matter from livestock houses. Atmos Environ 45:694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa A, Ferrari S, Guarino M (2012) Yearly emission factors of ammonia and particulate matter from three laying-hen housing systems. Anim Prod Sci 52:1089. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demmers T, Saponja A, Thomas R, Phillips GJ, McDonald AG, Stagg S, Bowry A, et al (2010) Dust and ammonia emissions from UK poultry houses: XVIIth World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

  • DIN 18910 (2017) Thermal insulation for closed livestock buildings - Thermal insulation and ventilation - Principles for planning and design for closed ventilated buildings

  • Eckel H, Büscher W, Feller B, Fritzsche S, Gaio C, Kämper H et al (2014) Energiebedarf in der Schweine- und Hühnerhaltung (KTBL-Heft, Vol. 105). Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) Council directive 1999/74/EC: laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Off J Eur Communities L 203:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino M, Caroli A, Navarotto P (1999) Dust concentration and mortality distribution in an enclosed laying house. Trans ASAE 42:1127–1134. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneau-Salaün A, Le Bouquin S, Bex-Capelle V, Huonnic D, Balaine L (2011) Endotoxin concentration in poultry houses for laying hens kept in cages or in alternative housing systems. Br Poult Sci 52:523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bouquin S, Huneau-Salaün A, Huonnic D, Balaine L, Martin S, Michel V (2013) Aerial dust in cage-housed, floor-housed, and aviary facilities for laying hens. Poult Sci 92(11):2827–2833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim TT, Heber AJ, Ni J-Q, Gallien JX, and Xin H (2003) Air quality measurements at a laying hen house: particulate matter concentrations and emissions. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Conference Proceedings and Presentations, 249–256

  • Mostafa E (2008) Improvement of air quality in laying hens barn using different particle separation techniques (Forschungsbericht Agrartechnik des Arbeitskreises Forschung und Lehre der max-Eyth-Gesellschaft Agrartechnik im VDI (VDI-MEG), Vol. 473). Bonn

  • Mostafa E, Buescher W (2011) Indoor air quality improvement from particle matters for laying hen poultry houses. Biosyst Eng 109:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni J-Q, Liu S, Diehl CA, Lim T-T, Bogan BW, Chen L, Chai L, Wang K, Heber AJ (2017a) Emission factors and characteristics of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter at two high-rise layer hen houses. Atmos Environ 154:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ni J-Q, Diehl CA, Chai L, Chen Y, Heber AJ, Lim T-T, Bogan BW (2017b) Factors and characteristics of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter emissions from two manure-belt layer hen houses. Atmos Environ 156:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmermark S, Lund V, Gustafsson G, Eduard W (2009) Ammonia, dust and bacteria in welfare-oriented systems for laying hens. Ann Agric Environ Med 2009(16):103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters TM, Ott D, O'Shaughnessy PT (2006) Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles. Ann Occup Hyg 50:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Monso E, Weber C, Hartung J et al (2002) Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann Agric Environ Med 9:41–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rylander R (1986) Lung diseases caused by organic dusts in the farm environment. Am J Ind Med 10:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700100306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker MB (2002) Current health effects of agricultural work: respiratory disease, cancer, reproductive effects, musculoskeletal injuries and pesicide-related illnesses. J Agric Saf Health 8(2):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheperd TA, Zhao Y, Li H, Stinn JP, Hayes MD, Xin H (2015) Environmental assessment of three egg production systems – part II. Ammonnia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions. Poult Sci 94:534–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO, Metz J, Groot Koerkamp P, Uenk GH et al (1998) Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 70:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VDI-Guideline 2463 - Part 1 (1999) Particulate matter measurement: gravimetric determination of the mass concentration of suspended particulate matter in ambient air (2463 - part 1). Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 2463 - Part 1. Accessed 26 January 2017

  • Winkel A, Mosquera J, Aarnink AJ, Groot Koerkamp PW, Ogink NW (2015) Evaluation of a dry filter and an electrostatic precipitator for exhaust air cleaning at commercial non-cage laying hen houses. Biosyst Eng 129:212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X (2010) Physical, chemical and biological properties of airborne particles emitted from animal confinement buildings: Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Illionois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

  • Zheng W, Li B, Cao W, Zhang G, Yang Z (2012) Application of neutral electrolyzed water spray for reducing dust levels in a layer breeding house. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 62:1329–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.710553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the animal housing owners for giving us the opportunity for achieving this study in their farm.

Funding

The project is supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support programme (founding code 2817200313).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Strohmaier.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strohmaier, C., Schmithausen, A.J., Krommweh, M.S. et al. Evaluation of a dry filter for dust removal under laboratory conditions in comparison to practical use at a laying hen barn. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 29511–29517 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2981-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2981-3

Keywords