Skip to main content

What new technology means for the energy demand in China? A sustainable development perspective

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 25, pages 29766–29771 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper explores the direct impact of new technology on the energy intensity in China. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds test approach to cointegration is utilised over the extended period of 1985–2013. The variables found cointegrated and confirm the long-run association among all the underlying vectors. Furthermore, the results of long- and short-run analysis reveal that new technology spurs energy intensity in China. A 1% increase in technological innovation boosts energy intensity by 0.4% and 0.03% in the long and short run, respectively. The findings suggest that the establishment of smart grids and solar energy parks followed by the reforms in energy sector is yet to achieve plausible efficiency in China. The existing investment and innovation policy reforms are insufficient to assist the energy sector to cope up with the country’s exceptional economic growth trend. Unlike other studies, this paper accommodates structural break in the series. During sensitivity analysis, the model is found stable. Hence, the findings possess important policy implications for China and open up new discussion in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. World Intellectual Property Organisation

References

  • Chen TJ (2016) The development of China’s solar photovoltaic industry: why industrial policy failed. Camb J Econ 40:755–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita G, Abbott A (2002) Are saving and investment cointegrated? An ARDL bounds testing approach. Econ Lett 77(2):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2017) Analyzing the effects of real income and biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from the panel of biomass-consuming countries. Energy 138:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2015) Energy Information Administration - EIA - Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government

  • Fisher-Vanden K, Jefferson GH, Jingkui M, Jianyi X (2006) Technology development and energy productivity in China. Energy Econ 28(5):690–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28(6–7):389–401

  • Herrerias MJ, Cuadros A, Luo D (2016) Foreign versus indigenous innovation and energy intensity: further research across Chinese regions. Appl Energy 162:1374–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring H, Roy R (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation 27(4):194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler K, Kostka G (2015) Wind and solar power in Brazil and China: interests, state–business relations, and policy outcomes. Glob Environ Pol 15(3):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub-Saharan Africa’s big 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy 123:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2003) Technological change and the environment. Handb Environ Econ 1:461–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karfakis C, Moschos D (1989) Testing for long run purchasing power parity: a time series analysis for the greek drachma. Econ Lett 30(3):245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus VJ (2007) Innovation in China’s energy sector. Center for Environmental Science and Policy, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontonikas A (2010) A new test of the inflation–real marginal cost relationship: ARDL bounds approach. Econ Lett 108(2):122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhou Y, Wu W (2015) Assessing the impact of population, income and technology on energy consumption and industrial pollutant emissions in China. Appl Energy 155(1):904–917

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meireles M, Soares I, Afonso O (2012) Dirty versus ecological technology in an endogenous growth model. Appl Econ Lett 19(8):729–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Smith RJ, Shin Y (2001) Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326

  • Popp DC (2001) The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resour Energy Econ 23(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDI (2015) World Development Indicators 2015. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • WIPO 2014 Available at: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/docs/infographics_pct_2014.pdf

  • Wu N (2011) China energy issues: energy intensity, coal liquefaction, and carbon pricing (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Yao X, Zhou H, Zhang A, Li A (2015) Regional energy efficiency, carbone mission performance and technology gaps in China: a meta frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy 84:142–154

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariadis T (2007) Exploring the relationship between energy use and economic growth with bivariate models: new evidence from G-7 countries. Energy Econ 29(6):1233–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Peng HR, Liu Z, Tan W (2015a) Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: a dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Energy Policy 87:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Wang AD, Tan W (2015b) The impact of China’s carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises. Energy Policy 86:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews D(1992) Further Evidence On The Great Grash, The Oil-Price Shock, And The Unit-Root Hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Sukkur IBA University, Airport Road, Sukkur, 65200, Pakistan

    Khalid Ahmed

  2. University of Göttingen, Wilhelmsplatz 1, 37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Khalid Ahmed

  3. Cag University, Adana - Mersin Otoyolu, 33800, Mersin, Turkey

    Ilhan Ozturk

Authors
  1. Khalid Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ilhan Ozturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilhan Ozturk.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, K., Ozturk, I. What new technology means for the energy demand in China? A sustainable development perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 29766–29771 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2957-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2957-3

Keywords

  • New technology
  • Energy demand
  • China