Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 24, pp 24281–24292 | Cite as

Trace element contaminant uptake in phytocap vegetation and implications for koala habitat, Lismore, Australia

  • Kate Summer
  • Amanda Reichelt-BrushettEmail author
Research Article


Phytocapping is increasingly regarded as an economical and environmentally sustainable post-closure landfill management strategy. During 2013, a phytocap comprised of koala habitat trees was established on a historic landfill site in Lismore as part of an Australian trial program (A-ACAP). This case study was conducted to determine trace element contamination of the Lismore phytocap soil and foliage, and identify risks to grazing koalas. Foliage of Eucalyptus tereticornis, a key koala food tree, and Acacia melanoxylon, a reference native species, were assessed at the phytocap and an uncontaminated reference site. Concentrations of Ag, As, Hg and Pb were significantly higher in foliage from the phytocap compared to that from the reference site (p < 0.0001df 7, 52). Mean trace element concentrations in phytocap E. tereticornis foliage were compliant with state and international standards for contaminants in food and animal feed (NSW State Government, 2010; WHO and FAO, 2015) and soil was compliant with national health-based investigation levels for contaminated sites (NEPC, 2011). However, contaminant distribution was not homogenous, and As and Pb concentrations exceeded guidelines in some soil and foliage samples. Based on available guidelines and weekly dietary intake calculations, risks to koala health posed by trace element contamination of phytocap foliage are currently low, though should be managed by continued monitoring as the vegetation matures.


Phytoremediation Phascolarctos cinereus Trace metals Bioaccumulation Leachate 



The authors acknowledge and thank the staff at Northern Rivers Waste, Dr. John Grant, Peter Bligh-Jones and Christian Jaehnichen for their assistance with field work and data handling.

Funding information

Financial support was provided by Lismore City Council and the SCU Environmental Analysis Laboratory.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2441_MOESM1_ESM.docx (64 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 64.3 kb)
11356_2018_2441_MOESM2_ESM.docx (62 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 61.7 kb)


  1. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2010) Measures of Australia’s progress, 2010: waste [Online]. Available: Subject/1370.0~2010~Chapter~ Waste%20(6.6). Accessed April 2018
  2. Albright WH, Benson CH, Gee GW, Abichou T, Tyler SW, Rock SA (2006) Field performance of three compacted clay landfill covers. Vadose Zone J 5(4):1157–1171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals: concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91(7):869–881. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ANZECC & NHMRC (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council & National Health and Medical Research Council) 1992 Australian and New Zealand guidelines for the assessment and management of contaminated sites. Sydney: ANZECC, p 66. Available: Accessed April 2018
  5. Archer MJG, Caldwell RA (2004) Response of six Australian plant species to heavy metal contamination at an abandoned mine site. Water Air Soil Pollut 157(1–4):257–267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashraf MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I (2011) Heavy metals accumulation in plants growing in ex tin mining catchment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(2):401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bale CL (1992) Eucalypts and angophoras of the North Coast New South Wales: a key to the indigenous species. Botany Dept, University of New England, Armidale, p 39Google Scholar
  8. Brady NC, Weil RR (2016) The nature and properties of soils, 15th edn. Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey, p 912Google Scholar
  9. El-Fadel M, Findikakis AN, Leckie JO (1997) Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. J Environ Manag 50(1):1–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis WAH, Melzer A, Carrick FN, Hasegawa M (2002) Tree use, diet and home range of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) at Blair Athol, central Queensland. Wildl Res 29(3):303–311. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emery A, Davies A, Griffiths A, Williams K (2007) Environmental and economic modelling: a case study of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Wales. Resour Conserv Recyl 49(3):244–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evangelou MWH, Robinson BH, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Schulin R (2012) Metal uptake and allocation in trees grown on contaminated land: implications for biomass production. Int J Phytoremediation 15(1):77–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Floyd AG (1990) Australian rainforests in New South Wales. Surrey Beatty and Sons, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand) (2003) The 20th Australian total diet survey: a total diet survey of pesticide residues and contaminants. FSANZ, Canberra, p 47Google Scholar
  15. Gall JE, Boyd RS, Rajakaruna N (2015) Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review. Environ Monit Assess 187(4):201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher L, Ferreira S, Convery F (2008) Host community attitudes towards solid waste landfill infrastructure: comprehension before compensation. J Environ Plan Manag 51(2):233–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldhaber SB (2003) Trace element risk assessment: essentiality vs toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 38(2):232–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hazelton P, Murphy B (2016) Interpreting soil test results: what do all the numbers mean? vol 186. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  19. Hindell MA, Lee AK (1987) Habitat use and tree preferences of koalas in a mixed eucalypt forest. Wildl Res 14(4):349–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hingston JA, Collins CD, Murphy RJ, Lester JN (2001) Leaching of chromated copper arsenate wood preservatives: a review. Environ Pollut 111(1):53–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban Development Series Knowledge Paper no. 15. World Bank, Urban Development and Local Government Unit, Washington DC, p 98Google Scholar
  22. Khapre A, Kumar S, Rajasekaran C (2017) Phytocapping: an alternate cover option for municipal solid waste landfills. Environ Technol 19:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH (2002) Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 32(4):297–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lamb DT, Venkatraman K, Bolan N, Ashwath N, Choppala G, Naidu R (2014) Phytocapping: an alternative technology for the sustainable management of landfill sites. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44(6):561–637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lancaster G (2006) Assessment of total soil manganese and chromium in basaltic soils of the North Coast, NSW: an assessment of manganese and chromium possible soil contamination as required for State Environmental Planning Policy 55. Southern Cross University, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Lismore, p 15Google Scholar
  26. LCC (Lismore City Council) (2013) Comprehensive koala plan of management for south-east Lismore. LCC, Lismore, p 83Google Scholar
  27. LCC (Lismore City Council) (2017). Phytocapping [Online]. Available: Accessed April 2018
  28. MacFarlane GR, Koller CE, Blomberg SP (2007) Accumulation and partitioning of heavy metals in mangroves: a synthesis of field-based studies. Chemosphere 69(9):1454–1464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maillard A, Diquélou S, Billard V, Laîné P, Garnica M, Prudent M, Garcia-Mina JM, Yvin JC, Ourry A (2015) Leaf mineral nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence and modulation by nutrient deficiency. Front Plant Sci 6:1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malik M, Chaney RL, Brewer EP, Li YM, Angle JS (2000) Phytoextraction of soil cobalt using hyperaccumulator plants. Int J Phytoremediation 2(4):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchiol L, Fellet G, Boscutti F, Montella C, Mozzi R, Guarino C (2013) Gentle remediation at the former “Pertusola Sud” zinc smelter: evaluation of native species for phytoremediation purposes. Ecol Eng 53:343–353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melzer A, Carrick F, Menkhorst P, Lunney D, St. John B (2000) Overview, critical assessment, and conservation implications of koala distribution and abundance. Conserv Biol 14(3):619–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore BD, Foley WJ (2000) A review of feeding and diet selection in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Aust J Zool 48(3):317–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM (2010) Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environ Chem Lett 8(3):199–216.
  35. NEPC (National Environment Protection Council) (2011) National Environment Protection Measure (assessment of site contamination)- Schedule B1: guideline on investigation levels for soil and groundwater, Canberra, NEPC, p 61Google Scholar
  36. NRCMA (Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority) (2012) State of the Environment, 2012: Lismore City Council supplement. NRCMA, Lismore, p 6Google Scholar
  37. NSW DPI (NSW Department of Primary Industries) 2004. Soil testing: result interpretation [Online]. Available: [Accessed April, 2018]
  38. NSW EPA (NSW Environment Protection Authority) (2016) Environmental guidelines: solid waste landfills, 2nd edn. NSW EPA, Sydney, p 91Google Scholar
  39. NSW OEH (NSW Office of Environment and Heritage) 2017. Koala habitat and feed trees [Online]. Available: [Accessed April, 2018]
  40. NSW State Government 2010. Stock food regulation, 2010. [Online]. Available: - /view/regulation/2010/451/sch1 [Accessed April, 2018]
  41. Peterson LR, Trivett V, Baker AJM, Aguiar C, Pollard AJ (2003) Spread of metals through an invertebrate food chain as influenced by a plant that hyperaccumulates nickel. Chemoecology 13(2):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillips B (1990) Koalas: the little Australians we’d all hate to lose. AGPS Press, Canberra, p 104Google Scholar
  43. Phillips IR, Greenway M, Robertson S (2004) Use of phytocaps in remediation of closed landfills: correct selection of soil materials. Land Contam Reclam 12(4):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pickin J (2009) Australian landfill capacities into the future. Final report prepared for DEWHA, Melbourne, Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd, p 48Google Scholar
  45. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Randell P, Pickin J, Grant B (2014) Waste generation and resource recovery in Australia: reporting period 2010/11. Final report prepared for DSEWPC. Blue Environment Pty Ltd, Docklands, p 128Google Scholar
  47. Reed P, Lunney D, Walker P (1990) Habitat loss: the key problem for the long-term survival of koalas in New South Wales. In: Lee A et al (eds) Biology of the koala. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, p 55–74Google Scholar
  48. Reuter D, Robinson, JB (1997) Plant analysis: an interpretation manual. Collingwood VIC, CSIRO Publishing, p 450.Google Scholar
  49. Salt M, Lightbody P, Stuart R, Albright W, Yeates R (2011) Guidelines for the assessment, design, construction and maintenance of phytocaps as final covers for landfills. Report no. 20100260RA3F prepared for WMAA, Australian Alternative Covers Assessment Program (A-ACAP), p 90Google Scholar
  50. Schwitzguébel JP, van der Lelie D, Baker A, Glass DJ, Vangronsveld J (2002) Phytoremediation: European and American trends: successes, obstacles and needs. J Soils Sediments 2(2):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shukla OP, Juwarkar AA, Singh SK, Khan S, Rai UN (2011) Growth responses and metal accumulation capabilities of woody plants during the phytoremediation of tannery sludge. Waste Manag 31(1):115–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strahan R (1991) The Australian Museum complete book of Australian mammals. Cornstalk Publishing, North Ryde, p 530Google Scholar
  53. Themelis NJ, Ulloa PA (2007) Methane generation in landfills. Renew Energy 32(7):1243–1257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G (2010) Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land: a review. Environ Chem Lett 8(1):1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Venkatraman K, Ashwath N (2007) Phytocapping: an alternative technique to reduce leachate and methane generation from municipal landfills. Environmentalist 27(1):155–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Venkatraman K, Ashwath N (2010) Field performance of a phytocap at Lakes Creek landfill, Rockhampton, Australia. Manage Environ Qual Int J 21(2):237–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. WCS (Wright Corporate Strategy) (2010) Review of the application of landfill standards: landfill performance study. Prepared for DEWHA, Canberra, pp 103Google Scholar
  58. WHO & FAO (World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) Codex Alimentarius international food standards: general standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. Codex Stan 193–1995, pp 93Google Scholar
  59. Wilson SC, Leech CD, Butler L, Lisle L, Ashley PM, Lockwood PV (2013) Effects of nutrient and lime additions in mine site rehabilitation strategies on the accumulation of antimony and arsenic by native Australian plants. J Hazard Mater 261:801–807. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. WMAA (Waste Management Association of Australia) (2004) Australian Alternative Covers Assessment Program (A-ACAP): project proposal. WMAA, Landfill Division, Melbourne, pp 9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment, Science and EngineeringSouthern Cross UniversityEast LismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations