Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 23, pp 23045–23054 | Cite as

Using natural clinoptilolite zeolite as an amendment in vermicomposting of food waste

  • Mansur Zarrabi
  • Ali Akbar Mohammadi
  • Tariq J. Al-Musawi
  • Hossein Najafi SalehEmail author
Research Article


The effect of adding different proportions of natural clinoptilolite zeolite (5 and 10%) to food waste vermicomposting was investigated by assessing the physicochemical characteristics, worms’ growth, and maturation time of finished vermicompost in comparison with the vermicompost prepared with no amendment (control). Vermicomposting was performed in 18 plastic containers for 70 days. The experimental results showed that the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratios were 15.85, 10.75, and 8.94 for 5 and 10% zeolite concentration and control after 70 days, respectively. The addition of zeolite could facilitate organic matter degradation and increase the total nitrogen content by adsorption of ammonium ions. Increasing the proportion of zeolite from 0% (control) to 10% decreased the ammonia escape by 25% in the final vermicompost. The natural zeolite significantly reduced the electrical conductivity (EC). At the end of the process, salinity uptake efficiency was 39.23% for 5% zeolite treatment and 45.23% for 10% zeolite treatment. The pH values at 5 and 10% zeolite-amended treatments were 7.31 and 7.57, respectively, in comparison to 7.10 in the control. The maturation time at the end of vermicomposting decreased with increasing zeolite concentration. The vermicompost containing 5 and 10% zeolite matured in 49 and 42 days, respectively, in comparison to 56 days for the control. With the use of an initial ten immature Eisenia fetida worms, the number of mature worms in the 10% zeolite treatment was 26 more than that in the 5% zeolite treatment (21 worms) and 9 more than that in the control treatment (17 worms). Significantly, natural zeolite showed a beneficial effect on the characteristics of the end-product when used in the vermicomposting of food waste.


Vermicomposting Eisenia fetida Maturity index Nitrogen loss Zeolite 



We are grateful to the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for its financial support of this research work. We are also thankful to Afrazand Co. and Zesco for their cooperation’s in the supply of natural zeolite and stock earthworms.


  1. Alavi N, Daneshpajou M, Shirmardi M, Goudarzi G, Neisi A, Babaei AA (2017) Investigating the efficiency of co-composting and vermicomposting of vinasse with the mixture of cow manure wastes, bagasse, and natural zeolite. Waste Manag 69:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberto C, Bernardi C, Oliviera PPA, Melo Monte MB, Souza-Barros F (2013) Brazilian sedimentary zeolite use in agriculture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 167:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Musawi TJ, Brouers F, Zarrabi M, Noroozi R (2018) What can the use of well-defined statistical functions of pollutants sorption kinetics teach us? A case study of cyanide sorption onto LTA zeolite nanoparticles. Environ Technol Innovat 10:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan MT, Selvam A, Wong JWC (2016) Reducing nitrogen loss and salinity during ‘struvite’ food waste composting by zeolite amendment. Bioresour Technol 200:838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiang KY, Huang HJ, Chang CN (2007) Enhancement of heavy metal stabilization by different amendments during sewage sludge composting process. J Environ Eng Manag 17:249Google Scholar
  6. Coulibaly SS, Zoro Bi IA (2010) Influence of animal wastes on growth and reproduction of the African earthworm species Eudrilus eugeniae (Oligochaeta). Eur J Soil Biol 46:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitrios PK, Ioannis ST (2009) A statistical analysis to assess the maturity and stability of six composts. Waste Manag 29:1504–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein E (1999) Mineral metabolism. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. García-Sánchez M, Taušnerová H, Hanč A, Tlustoš P (2017) Stabilization of different starting materials through vermicomposting in a continuous-feeding system: changes in chemical and biological parameters. Waste Manag 62:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gholamhoseini M, Ghalavand A, Jamshidi E (2007) The effect of irrigation regimes and fertilizer treatments on grain yield and elements concentration in leaf and grain of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi 79:91–100Google Scholar
  11. Gomez-Brandon M, Cristina L, Dominguez J (2008) The evaluation of stability and maturity during the composting of cattle manure. Chemosphere 70:436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene KL, Tonjes DJ (2014) Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State. Waste Manag 34:825–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hung ZT, Petrovic AM (1994) Clinoptilolite influence on nitrate leaching and nitrogen use efficiency in simulated sand based golf greens. J Environ Qual 23:1190–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglezakis JV, Stylianou MA, Loizidou M, Zorpas AA (2016) Experimental studies and modeling of clinoptilolite and vermiculite fixed beds for Mn2+, Zn2+ and Cr3+ removal. Desalin Water Treat 75(25):11610–11622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivankin AN, Pandya U, Saraf M (2014) Intensification of aerobic processing of the organic wastes into compost. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Composting for sustainable agriculture. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Ch. 2Google Scholar
  16. Jeroen A, Bokhoven V, Lamberti C (2014) Structure of aluminum, iron, and other heteroatoms in zeolites by X-ray absorption spectroscopy, coordination. Chem Rev 278:275–290Google Scholar
  17. Karak T, Bhattacharyya P, Paul RK, Das T, Saha SK (2013) Evaluation of composts from agricultural wastes with fish pond sediment as bulking agent to improve compost quality. Clean 41:711–723Google Scholar
  18. Lee LH, Wu TY, Shak KPY, Lim SL, Ng KY, Nguyen MN, Teoh WH (2018) Sustainable approach to biotransform industrial sludge into organic fertilizer via vermicomposting: a mini-review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:925–935. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefcourt AM, Meisinger JJ (2001) Effect of adding zeolite to dairy slurry on ammonia volatilization and chemical composition. J Dairy Sci 84:1814–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li R, Wang JJ, Zhang Z, Shen F, Zhang G, Qin R, Li X, Xiao R (2012) Nutrient transformations during composting of pig manure with bentonite. Bioresour Technol 121:362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim SL, Wu TY (2016) Characterization of matured vermicompost derived from valorization of palm oil mill byproduct. J Agric Food Chem 64(8):1761–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lim PN, Wu TY, Sim EYS, Lim SL (2011) The potential reuse of soybean husk as feed stock of Eudrilus eugeniae in vermicomposting. J Sci Food Agric 91(14):2637–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim PN, Wu TY, Clarke C, Daud NNN (2015a) A potential bioconversion of empty fruit bunches into organic fertilizer using Eudrilus eugeniae. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(8):2533–2544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim SL, Wu TY, Lim PN, Shak KPY (2015b) The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics. J Sci Food Agric 95:1143–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY (2016) Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 111:262–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Majlessi M, Eslami A, Najafi SH, Mirshafieean S, Babaii S (2012) Vermicomposting of food waste: assessing the stability and maturity. J Environ Health Sci Eng 25:1–6Google Scholar
  27. Mohseni-Bandpi A, Al-Musawi TJ, Ghahramani E, Zarrabi M, Mohebi S, Vahed SA (2016) Improvement of zeolite adsorption capacity for cephalexin by coating with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Mol Liq 218:615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nolan T, Troy SM, Healy MG, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ, Lawlor PG (2011) Characterization of compost produced from separated pig manure and a variety of bulking agents at low initial C/N ratios. Bioresour Technol 102:7131–7138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noroozi R, Al-Musawi T, Kazemian H, Kalhori1 E, Zarrabi M (2018) Removal of cyanide using surface-modified Linde type-a zeolite nanoparticles as an efficient and eco-friendly material. J Water Process Eng 21:44–51Google Scholar
  30. Ofosu-Budu GK, Hogarh JN, Fobil JN, Quaye A, Danso SKA, Carboo D (2010) Harmonizing procedures for the evaluation of compost maturity in two compost types in Ghana. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rostami R, Nabaey A, Eslami A, Najafi Saleh H, Fazlzadeh M (2010a) Variation of compost’s qualitative and quantitative indices in vermicomposting process. J Health 3(1):16–22Google Scholar
  32. Rostami R, Najafi SH, Nabaee A, Eslami A (2010b) Survey of E. Fetida population on pH, C/N ratio process rate in vermicompost. J Environ Stud 35(52):93–98Google Scholar
  33. Safar-khanloo L., Torkamani H., 2006 Production of vermicompost: a new method for management of solid waste. Proceeding of the 3th Natl. Symposium of Solid Waste Management, 357–369Google Scholar
  34. Sanjeev KA, Jonathan WCW, Jiao L, Quan W, Zengqiang Z, Sunil K, Mukesh KA (2018) Evaluation of microbial dynamics during post-consumption food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 251:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shak KPY, Wu TY, Lim SL, Lee CA (2014) Sustainable reuse of rice residues as feedstocks in vermicomposting for organic fertilizer production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(2):1349–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh J, Prasad R, Kalamdhad AS (2013) Effect of natural zeolite on bioavailability and leachability of heavy metals during rotary drum composting of green waste. Res J Chem Environ 17:26–34Google Scholar
  37. Soobhany N, Mohee R, Garg VK (2015) Recovery of nutrient from Municipal Solid Waste by composting and vermicomposting using earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. J Environ Chem Eng 3(4):2931–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soobhany N, Mohee R, Garg VK (2017) Inactivation of bacterial pathogenic load in compost against vermicompost of organic solid waste aiming to achieve sanitation goals: a review. Waste Manag 64:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun R, Guo X, Wang D, Chu H (2015) Effects of long-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers on the abundance of microbial communities involved in the nitrogen cycle. Appl Soil Ecol 95:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiquia SM, TAM NFY (2000) Fate of nitrogen during composting of chicken litter. Environ Pollut 110:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Troy SM, Nolan T, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ, Healy MG, Lawlor PG (2012) Effect of sawdust addition on composting of separated raw and anaerobically digested pig manure. J Environ Manag 111:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turan NG (2008) The effects of natural zeolite on salinity level of poultry litter compost. Bioresour Technol 99:2097–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turan NG, Ergun ON (2007) Ammonia uptake by natural zeolite in municipal solid waste compost. Environ Prog 26:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tzia CC, Zorpas AA (2012) Zeolites in food processing industries. In: Inglezakis VJ, Zorpas AA (eds) Hanbook of natural zeolites. Bentham Science Publishers, Dubai, pp 601–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. US Composting Council Research and Education Foundation (2002) TMECC (Test Methods for the Examination of Composts and Composting) [pdf]. Available at: [accessed 20 Jan 2015]Google Scholar
  46. Wang J, Hu Z, Xu X, Jiang X, Zheng B, Liu X, Pan X (2014) Emissions of ammonia and greenhouse gases during combined pre-composting and vermicomposting of duck manure. Waste Manag 34(8):1546–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. William FB (1998) Volatile organic acids in compost: production and odorant aspects. Compost Sci Util 6:75–82Google Scholar
  48. Wu TY, Lim SL, Lim PN, Shak KPY (2014) Biotransformation of biodegradable solid wastes into organic fertilizers using composting or/and vermicomposting. Chem Eng Trans 39:1579–1584Google Scholar
  49. Yorukogullari E, Yilmaz G, Dikmen S (2009) Thermal treatment of zeolitic tuff. J Therm Anal Calorim 9:503–508Google Scholar
  50. Zhang L, Sun X (2015) Effects of earthworm casts and zeolite on the two-stage composting of green waste. Waste Manag 39:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhenfeng W, Jingzheng R, Michael EG, Guangyin X (2018) Waste-to-energy, municipal solid waste treatment, and best available technology: comprehensive evaluation by an interval-valued fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. J Clean Prod 172:887–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zorpas AA (2008) Sewage sludge compost evaluation in oats, pepper and eggplant cultivation, dynamic soil—dynamic plants. Global Science Book 2(2):103–109Google Scholar
  53. Zorpas AA (2014) Recycle and reuse of natural zeolites from composting process: a 7 years project. Desalin Water Treat 52:6847–6857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zorpas AA, Loizidou M (2008) Sawdust and natural zeolite as a bulking agent for improving quality of a composting product from anaerobically stabilized sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 99:7545–7552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zucconi F, De Bertoldi M (1987) Compost specifications for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste. Elsevier, Barking, pp 30–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mansur Zarrabi
    • 1
  • Ali Akbar Mohammadi
    • 2
  • Tariq J. Al-Musawi
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hossein Najafi Saleh
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of HealthAlborz University of Medical SciencesKarajIran
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health EngineeringNeyshabur University of Medical SciencesNeyshaburIran
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringIsra UniversityAmmanJordan
  4. 4.Department of Env. Eng., College of EngineeringUniversity of BaghdadBaghdadIraq
  5. 5.Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical SciencesTorbat HeydariyehIran

Personalised recommendations