Skip to main content

Influence of fishing activity over the marine debris composition close to coastal jetty

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 25, pages 16246–16253 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Worldwide, the marine debris emissions have been provoking impacts in ecosystems, generating massive mortality of different species with commercial interest. In South America, we have a lack of studies to verify the marine debris composition in transitional environments such as adjacent regions of coastal jetties. These are hydraulic engineering constructions used to maintain the navigation channel access between the sea-estuarine interface and are also used by teleost fishes, crustaceans, and mollusks like artificial shelters (reefs), being excellent fishing grounds. Therefore, the present study was devoted to qualitatively evaluate the composition of marine debris in an internal jetty portion of a Laguna Estuarine System (LES) located in South America (Brazil). Six hundred freediving were conducted to collect marine debris in the study region. The in situ campaigns were performed in 2016 during all spring season (sand substrata) in four distinct zones with 26,400 m2 each one covering almost all adjacent jetty extension, to evaluate possible spatial changes in the marine debris composition. All material obtained was identified, measured, weighed, and ordered in eight groups, with six groups being related to the fishing activity and two groups related to the tourism/community in the study region. So, it was possible to observe possible relations between the marine debris distribution to artisanal and recreational local fishing. After 600 freediving sampling efforts, 2142 marine debris items were obtained, totaling close to 100 kg of solid waste removed from the inner portion of the coastal jetty. Notably, 1752 units (50 kg) of fishing leads were collected being this item the main marine debris residue found in the four sampled areas, corresponding to nearly 50% of the total weight of the collected waste. Ninety-eight percent of marine debris were derived from the local fishing activities, and just 2% were derived from tourism/community. Considering the total contribution related to fishing, 83% of the marine debris were composed by lead (sinkers) adopted by recreational and artisanal fishing. Notably, the catch activity in this region has a close influence over the marine debris composition. Reductions of marine debris emissions derived from the fishing activities have been a global challenge, once this problem is occurring in practically all marine and estuarine environments under the anthropic action. The presence of marine debris changes the local landscape and can provoke serious environmental problems, such as ghost fishing that affects a wide variability of marine mammals, birds, and fishes. Most of marine debris collected came from recreational and artisanal fishing, being the fishing leads the most prominent material, especially in sector 4. This fact is possibly related to the intense mullet fishing using cast nets, usual in this sample area. In the other sectors, there was a great predominance of grapnel fishing leads, widely adopted by recreational fishermen in open water environments. The “fingernails” present in these fishing leads ensure the sinking of the line for a specific location independently of possible flow oscillations of the tidal current and/or currents generated by winds. The massive quantity of fishing leads into the sectors is a dangerous fact. Notably, lead is a heavy, non-biodegradable, and extremely toxic metal that, due to the anthropogenic activities, has been increasing around the world. Future efforts in our study region should evaluate the seasonal marine debris composition to observe possible changes along the different seasons of the year. In this way, it would be possible to infer quantitatively the emission of marine debris derived from the fishing activity, assessing its impacts and enabling the adoption of environmental management strategies. This effort adopted a qualitative analysis, serving to show the current situation of this region that we now know to be vulnerable to the presence of marine debris derived from the fishing activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Aguilera MA, Broitman BR, Thiel M (2016) Artificial breakwaters as garbage bins: structural complexity enhances anthropogenic litter accumulation in marine intertidal habitats. Environ Pollut 214:737–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrady AL (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Poll Bull 62(8):1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MCB, Costa M (2006) Municipal services on tourist beaches: costs and benefits of solid waste collection. J Coast Res 22(5):1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.2112/03-0069.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asoh K, Yoshikawa T, Kosaki R, Marschall AE (2004) Damage to cauliflower coral by monofilament fishing lines in Hawaii. Conserv Biol 18(6):1645–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barletta M, Lima ARA, Dantas DV, Oliveira IM, Reis Neto J, Fernandes CAF, Farias EGG, Rodrigues Filho JL, Costa MF (2017) How can Accurate Landing Stats Help Designing Better Fisheries and Environmental Management for Western Atlantic Estuaries? In: Charles W. Finkl & Christopher Makowski (Org.). Coastal Wetlands: Alteration and Remediation 1ed. Dordrecht: Springer Nature, v. 21, p. 1–64. 10.1007%2F978-3-319-56179-0_20

  • Bravo M, Gallardo MA, Luna-Jonquera G, Núñez P, Vásquez N, Thiel M (2009) Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): results from a national survey supported by volunteers. Mar Poll Bull 58(11):1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo ALP, Farias EGG, Rodrigues-Filho JL, Moteiro IB, Scandolo TM, Dantas DV (2018) Feeding ecology and ingestion of plastic fragments by Priacanthus arenatus: what’s the fisheries contribution to the problem? Mar Poll Bull 130:19–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coe JM, Rogers DB (1997) Marine debris: sources, impacts, and solutions. Springer-Verlag, New York 432p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Barbosa CC, Portugal JL, Barletta M (2011) Plastic buried in the inter-tidal plain of a tropical estuarine ecosystem. J Coast Res 64:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF (2012) The seasonal and spatial patterns of ingestion of polyfilament nylon fragments by estuarine drums (Sciaenidae). Environ Sci Pollut R 19:600–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0579-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daura-Jorge FG, Ingram S, Simões-Lopes PC (2013) Seasonal abundance and adult survival of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in a community that cooperatively forages with fishermen in southern Brazil. Mar Mammal Sci 29:293–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2012.00571.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derraik JGB (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Poll Bull 44(9):842–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engler RE (2012) The complex interaction between marine debris and toxic chemicals in the ocean. Environ Sci Technol 46(22):12302–12315. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3027105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson C, Burton H (2003) Origins and biological accumulation of small plastic particles in fur seals from Macquarie Island. Ambio 32:380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franson JC, Hansen SP, Creekmore TE, Brand CJ, Evers DC, Duerr AE (2003) Lead fishing weights and other fishing tackle in selected waterbirds. Waterbirds 26(3):345–352. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0345:LFWAOF]2.0.CO;2

  • Ivar do Sul JA, Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Araújo MCB (2014) Plastic debris retention and exportation by a mangrove forest patch. Mar Poll Bull 78:252–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223):768–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiessling T, Gutow L, Thiel M (2015) Marine litter as a habitat and dispersal vector. Marine anthropogenic litter. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lusher AL, Hollman PCH, Mendoza-Hill JJ (2017) Microplastic in fisheries and aquaculture: status of knowledge on their occurrence and implications for aquatic organisms and food safety. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 615, Rome 147p

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen G, Huntington T, Cappell R (2009) Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No.185; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, No. 523. Rome, UNEP/FAO. 115 p.

  • Mcphee DP, Leadbitter D, Skilleter GA (2002) Swallowing the bait: is recreational fishing ecologically sustainable? Pac Conserv Biol 8(1):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcilgorm A, Campbell HF, Rule MJ (2011) The economic cost and control of marine debris damage in the Asia-Pacific region. Ocean Coast Manage 54(9):643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray F, Cowie PR (2011) Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean (Nephrops norvegicus) (Linnaeus, 1758). Mar Poll Bull 62(6):1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.03.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman HL, Schell A, Bellinger D, Leviton A, Allred EN (1990) The long term effects of exposure to low doses of lead in childhood. An 11-year follow-up report. N Engl J Med 322:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199001113220203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pham CK, Ramirez-Llodra LE, Alt CHS, Amaro T, Bergmann M, Canals M, Company JB, Duineveld G, Galgani F, Howell KL, Huvenne VAI, Isidro E, Jones DOB, Lastras G, Morato T, Gomes-Pereira JN, Purser A, Stewart H, Tojeira I, Tubau X, Rooij DV, Tyler PA (2014) Marine litter distribution and gensity in European seas, from the shelves to deep basins. Plos One 9(4):e95839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Possatto FE, Barletta M, Costa MF, Ivar do Sul J, Dantas DV (2011) Plastic debris ingestion by marine catfish: an unexpected fisheries impact. Mar Poll Bull 62:1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos IR, Friedrich AC, Ivar do Sul JA (2009) Marine debris contamination along undeveloped tropical beaches from Northeast Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 148(1–4):455–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0175-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuhammer AM, Norris SL (1996) The ecotoxicology of lead shot and lead fishing weights. Ecotoxicology 5(5):279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheavly SB, Register KM (2007) Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. J Polym Environ 15(4):301–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-007-0074-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca: Microcomputer Power

Download references

Funding

This study is funded by the Grupo de Tecnologia e Ciência Pesqueira (TECPESCA) from the Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca e Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC – Campus Laguna) (NPP20160002388).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Grupo de Tecnologia e Ciência Pesqueira (TECPESCA), Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca e Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), R. Cel. Fernandes Martins, Laguna, Santa Catarina, 270, Brazil

    Eduardo G. G. Farias, Paulo R. Preichardt & David V. Dantas

  2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento Territorial e Desenvolvimento Socioambiental (PPGPLAN) - UDESC/FAED, Florianópolis, Brazil

    David V. Dantas

Authors
  1. Eduardo G. G. Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paulo R. Preichardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David V. Dantas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo G. G. Farias.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farias, E.G.G., Preichardt, P.R. & Dantas, D.V. Influence of fishing activity over the marine debris composition close to coastal jetty. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 16246–16253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2012-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2012-4

Keywords

  • Marine pollution
  • Artisanal fishing
  • Recreational fishing
  • Transitional environments