Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 17, pp 16864–16874 | Cite as

Efficient removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous media using magnetic polyaniline-doped strontium–titanium nanocomposite

  • Mohammad Kazem Mohammadi Nodeh
  • Mohammad Ali Gabris
  • Hamid Rashidi Nodeh
  • Mehdi Esmaeili Bidhendi
Research Article
  • 139 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a novel nanocomposite adsorbent based on magnetic polyaniline and strontium–titanium (MP-SrTiO3) nanoparticles was synthesized via a simple and low-cost polymerization method for efficiently removing of arsenic(III) ions from aqueous samples. The chemical structure, surface properties, and morphology of the prepared adsorbent were studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The main effective parameters on the removal efficiency, such as pH, adsorbent dosage, salt, and contact time, were studied and optimized. The validity of the proposed method was checked by adsorption isotherm and kinetics models. Consequently, the adsorption kinetics corresponded to the first order (R2 > 0.99), and the experimental equilibrium fitted the Langmuir model with a maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of 67.11 mg/g (R2 > 0.99) for arsenic(III) ions. Corresponding to thermodynamic Vant’s Hof model (ΔG° (kJ/mol), ΔH° (kJ/mol), and ΔS° (kJ/mol K) − 8.19, − 60.61, and − 0.17, respectively), the mechanism and adsorption nature were investigated with that suggested exothermic and physisorption mechanism.

Keywords

Polyaniline Strontium–titanium oxide Magnetic adsorbent Arsenic Kinetics Adsorption isotherm 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tehran Province Water & Wastewater Co., (Tehran, Iran) and Graduate Faculty of Environment (University of Tehran) for the facilities.

Funding information

The authors would like to thank Young Researchers and Elite Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (Tehran, Iran) for the financial support.

References

  1. Ayawei N, Ebelegi AN, Wankasi D (2017) Modelling and interpretation of adsorption isotherms. J Chem 2017:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3039817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babaee Y, Mulligan CN, Rahaman MS (2017) Removal of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) from aqueous solutions through adsorption by Fe/Cu nanoparticles. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaumik M, Noubactep C, Gupta VK, McCrindle RI, Maity A (2015) Polyaniline/Fe0 composite nanofibers: an excellent adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 271:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantuaria ML, de Almeida Neto AF, Nascimento ES, Vieira MGA (2016) Adsorption of silver from aqueous solution onto pre-treated bentonite clay: complete batch system evaluation. J Clean Prod 112:1112–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao C, Xiao L, Chen C, Shi X, Cao Q, Gao L (2014) In situ preparation of magnetic Fe3O4/chitosan nanoparticles via a novel reduction–precipitation method and their application in adsorption of reactive azo dye. Powder Technol 260:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cechinel MAP, de Souza AAU (2014) Study of lead(II) adsorption onto activated carbon originating from cow bone. J Clean Prod 65:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chauhan D, Dwivedi J, Sankararamakrishnan N (2014) Novel chitosan/PVA/zerovalent iron biopolymeric nanofibers with enhanced arsenic removal applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:9430–9442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Xu J, Yang Z, Zhang L, Cao C, Xu Z, Liu J (2017) One-pot synthesis of ternary zero-valent iron/phosphotungstic acid/gC3 N4 composite and its high performance for removal of arsenic (V) from water. Appl Surf Sci 425:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudhury TR, Acher T, Amin MN, Quraishi S, Mustafa A (2015) Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater by adsorption onto duckweed (Lemna minor). Int Res J Pure Appl Chem 6:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davodi B, Jahangiri M (2014) Determination of optimum conditions for removal of As(III) and As(V) by polyaniline/polystyrene nanocomposite. Synth Met 194:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demiral H, Güngör C (2016) Adsorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions on activated carbon prepared from grape bagasse. J Clean Prod 124:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan WH (2016) Removal of Pb2+ from water environment using a novel magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide imprinted Pb2+. Int J Biol Macromol 86:505–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eskandarpour N, Sereshti H, Najarzadekan H, Gaikani H (2016) Polyurethane/polystyrene-silica electrospun nanofibrous composite for the headspace solid-phase microextraction of chlorophenols coupled with gas chromatography. J Sep Sci 39:4637–4644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fayazi M, Ali M, Afzali D et al (2016) Synthesis and application of novel ion-imprinted polymer coated magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes for selective solid phase extraction of lead (II) ions. Mater Sci Eng C 60:365–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gohari RJ, Lau WJ, Matsuura T, Ismail AF (2013) Fabrication and characterization of novel PES/Fe–Mn binary oxide UF mixed matrix membrane for adsorptive removal of As (III) from contaminated water solution. Sep Purif Technol 118:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grund SC, Hanusch K, Wolf HU (2008) Arsenic and arsenic compounds.. Ullmann’s Encycl Ind Chem,Google Scholar
  17. Huang C, Xie W, Li X, Zhang J (2011) Speciation of inorganic arsenic in environmental waters using magnetic solid phase extraction and preconcentration followed by ICP-MS. Microchim Acta 173:165–172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-010-0532-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iqbal MJ, Ashiq MN (2008) Physical and electrical properties of Zr–Cu substituted strontium hexaferrite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Chem Eng J 136:383–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kandah MI, Meunier J-L (2007) Removal of nickel ions from water by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 146:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee K-Y, Park M, Kim J, Oh M, Lee EH, Kim KW, Chung DY, Moon JK (2016) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study of cesium adsorption onto nanocrystalline mordenite from high-salt solution. Chemosphere 150:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Y-H, Ding J, Luan Z, di Z, Zhu Y, Xu C, Wu D, Wei B (2003) Competitive adsorption of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 41:2787–2792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00392-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu W, Yin P, Liu X, Dong X, Zhang J, Xu Q (2013) Thermodynamics, kinetics, and isotherms studies for gold (III) adsorption using silica functionalized by diethylenetriaminemethylenephosphonic acid. Chem Eng Res Des 91:2748–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahmoodi NM (2013) Magnetic ferrite nanoparticle–alginate composite: synthesis , characterization and binary system dye removal. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2012.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahmoud ME, Nabil GM, El-Mallah NM et al (2016) Kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies of the adsorption of reactive red 195 A dye from water by modified Switchgrass Biochar adsorbent. J Ind Eng Chem 37:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maszkowska J, Wagil M, Mioduszewska K, Kumirska J, Stepnowski P, Białk-Bielińska A (2014) Thermodynamic studies for adsorption of ionizable pharmaceuticals onto soil. Chemosphere 111:568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mohan D, Pittman CU (2007) Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review. J Hazard Mater 142:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moussavi G, Mahmoudi M (2009) Removal of azo and anthraquinone reactive dyes from industrial wastewaters using MgO nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 168:806–812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qi J, Zhang G, Li H (2015) Efficient removal of arsenic from water using a granular adsorbent: Fe–Mn binary oxide impregnated chitosan bead. Bioresour Technol 193:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajabalizadeh Z, Seifzadeh D (2016) Strontium phosphate conversion coating as an economical and environmentally-friendly pretreatment for electroless plating on AM60B magnesium alloy. Surf Coatings Technol 304:450–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rashidi Nodeh H, Sereshti H (2016) Synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide doped with strontium titanium trioxide nanoparticles as a nanocomposite for the removal of antibiotics from aqueous media. RSC Adv 6:89953–89965.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA18341G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rashidi Nodeh H, Wan Ibrahim WA, Kamboh MA, Sanagi MM (2015) Dispersive graphene-based silica coated magnetic nanoparticles as a new adsorbent for preconcentration of chlorinated pesticides from environmental water. RSC Adv 5:76424–76434.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA13450A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rashidi Nodeh H, Wan Ibrahim WA, Ali I, Sanagi MM (2016) Development of magnetic graphene oxide adsorbent for the removal and preconcentration of As(III) and As(V) species from environmental water samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:9759–9773.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6137-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ren Y, Yan N, Wen Q, Fan Z, Wei T, Zhang M, Ma J (2011) Graphene/δ-MnO2 composite as adsorbent for the removal of nickel ions from wastewater. Chem Eng J 175:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Šafaříková M, Šafařík I (1999) Magnetic solid-phase extraction. J Magn Magn Mater 194:108–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00566-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saleh TA, Sarı A, Tuzen M (2016) Chitosan-modified vermiculite for As(III) adsorption from aqueous solution: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. J Mol Liq 219:937–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sayğılı H, Güzel F (2016) High surface area mesoporous activated carbon from tomato processing solid waste by zinc chloride activation: process optimization, characterization and dyes adsorption. J Clean Prod 113:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sellaoui L, Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S et al (2017a) New insights into single-compound and binary adsorption of copper and lead ions on a treated sea mango shell: experimental and theoretical studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:25927–25937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellaoui L, Dotto GL, Lamine AB, Erto A (2017b) Interpretation of single and competitive adsorption of cadmium and zinc on activated carbon using monolayer and exclusive extended monolayer models. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(24):19902–19908.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9562-8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sereshti H, Amini F, Najazadekan H (2015a) Electrospun polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanofibers as a new adsorbent for solid phase microextraction of chromium(VI) in environmental water samples. RSC Adv 5:89195–89203.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA14788C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sereshti H, Farahani MV, Baghdadi M (2015b) Trace determination of chromium(VI) in environmental water samples using innovative thermally reduced graphene (TRG) modified SiO2 adsorbent for solid phase extraction and UV-Vis Spectrophotometry. Talanta 146:662–669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shahabuddin S, Muhamad Sarih N, Mohamad S, Joon Ching J (2016a) SrTiO3 nanocube-doped polyaniline nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light. Polymers (Basel) 8:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shahabuddin S, Sarih NM, Afzal Kamboh M, Rashidi Nodeh H, Mohamad S (2016b) Synthesis of polyaniline coated graphene oxide@SrTiO3 nanocube nanocomposites for enhanced removal of carcinogenic dyes from aqueous solution. Polymers (Basel) 8:305–310.  https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201608.0128.v1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shipley HJ, Yean S, Kan AT, Tomson MB (2009) Adsorption of arsenic to magnetite nanoparticles: effect of particle concentration, pH, ionic strength, and temperature. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:509–515.  https://doi.org/10.1897/08-155.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shrestha S, Son G, Lee SH, Lee TG (2013) Isotherm and thermodynamic studies of Zn(II) adsorption on lignite and coconut shell-based activated carbon fiber. Chemosphere 92:1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sim B, Chae HS, Choi HJ (2015) Fabrication of polyaniline coated iron oxide hybrid particles and their dual stimuli-response under electric and magnetic fields. Polym Lett 9:736–743.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sreeprasad TS, Maliyekkal SM, Lisha KP, Pradeep T (2011) Reduced graphene oxide-metal/metal oxide composites: facile synthesis and application in water purification. J Hazard Mater 186:921–931.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Su F, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Wang G (2016) Three-dimensional honeycomb-like structured zero-valent iron/chitosan composite foams for effective removal of inorganic arsenic in water. J Colloid Interface Sci 478:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun Z, Lv F, Cao L, Liu L, Zhang Y, Lu Z (2015) Preparation of polyamide 6/silica nanocomposites from silica surface initiated ring-opening anionic polymerization. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:7944–7948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tangahu BV, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng 2011:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tayyebi A, Outokesh M (2016) Supercritical synthesis of a magnetite-reduced graphene oxide hybrid with enhanced adsorption properties toward cobalt & strontium ions. RSC Adv 6:13898–13913.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra19057f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tian Z, Yu H, Wang L, Saleem M, Ren F, Ren P, Chen Y, Sun R, Sun Y, Huang L (2014) Recent progress in the preparation of polyaniline nanostructures and their applications in anticorrosive coatings. RSC Adv 4:28195–28208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Zyl WE, García M, Schrauwen BAG et al (2002) Hybrid polyamide/silica nanocomposites: synthesis and mechanical testing. Macromol Mater Eng 287:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang J, Xu W, Chen L, Huang X, Liu J (2014) Preparation and evaluation of magnetic nanoparticles impregnated chitosan beads for arsenic removal from water. Chem Eng J 251:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu R, Qu J, Chen Y (2005) Magnetic powder MnO-Fe2O3 composite—a novel material for the removal of azo-dye from water. Water Res 39:630–638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yvonne L, Musico F, Catherine M, Santos M, Rodrigues D (2013) Improved removal of lead(II) from water using a polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposite. J Mater Chem A 1:3789–3796.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta01616a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou Q, Wang J, Liao X et al (2015) Removal of As(III) and As(V) from water using magnetic core-shell nanomaterial Fe3O4@polyaniline. Int J Green Technol 1:55–64Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Kazem Mohammadi Nodeh
    • 1
  • Mohammad Ali Gabris
    • 2
  • Hamid Rashidi Nodeh
    • 3
  • Mehdi Esmaeili Bidhendi
    • 4
  1. 1.Water Quality Control LaboratoryTehran Province Water & Wastewater Co.TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  4. 4.Graduate Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations