Characterization of toluene metabolism by methanotroph and its effect on methane oxidation
- 140 Downloads
Methanotrophs not only oxidize CH4, but also can oxidize a relatively broad range of other substrates, including trichloroethylene, alkanes, alkenes, and aromatic compounds. In this study, Methylosinus sporium was used as a model organism to characterize toluene metabolism by methanotrophs. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR analysis showed that toluene enhanced the mmoX expression of M. sporium. When the toluene concentration was below 2000 mg m−3, the kinetics of toluene metabolism by M. sporium conformed to the Michaelis-Menten equation (Vmax = 0.238 g gdry weight−1 h−1, K m = 545.2 mg m−3). The use of a solid-phase extraction technique followed by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis and molecular docking calculation showed that toluene was likely to primarily bind the di-iron center structural region of soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) hydroxylase and then be oxidized to o-cresol. Although M. sporium oxidized toluene, it did not incorporate toluene into its biomass. The coexistence of toluene and CH4 could influence CH4 oxidation, the growth of methanotrophs, and the distribution of CH4-derived carbon, which were related to the ratio of the toluene concentration to biomass. These results would be helpful to understand the metabolism of CH4 and non-methane volatile organic compounds in the environment.
KeywordsMethanotroph Methane monooxygenase Toluene Kinetics Methane-derived carbon
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant Nos. 41671245 and 41371012, Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (LR13E080002).
- Alvarez-Cohen L, McCarty PL (1991) Product toxicity and cometabolic competitive inhibition modeling of chloroform and trichloroethylene transformation by resting methanotrophic resting cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1031–1037Google Scholar
- Bratbak G, Dundas I (1984) Bacteria dry matter content and biomass estimations. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:755–757Google Scholar
- Costello AM, Lidstrom ME (1999) Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5066–5074Google Scholar
- Hanson RS, Hanson TE (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Res 60:439–471Google Scholar
- Henry SM, Galic D (1991) Influence of endogenous and exogenous electron donors and trichloroethylene oxidation toxicity on trichloroethylene oxidation by methanotrophic cultures from a groundwater aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:236–244Google Scholar
- Mueller JG, Middaugh DP, Lantz SE, Chapman PJ (1991) Biodegradation of creosote and pentachlorphenol in contaminated groundwater: chemical and biological assessment. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1277–1285Google Scholar
- Parker T, Dottridge J, Kelly S (2002) Investigation of the composition and emissions of trace components in landfill gas (P1–438/TR). Technical Report, Environment Agency, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
- Rataj MJ, Kauth JE, Donnelly MI (1991) Oxidation of deuterated compounds by high specific activity methane monooxygenase from Methylosinus trichosporium: mechanistic implications. J Biol Chem 266:18684–18690Google Scholar