Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 17, pp 16933–16944 | Cite as

Contrasting congener profiles for persistent organic pollutants and PAH monitoring in European storm petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus) breeding in Ireland: a preen oil versus feathers approach

  • Heidi Acampora
  • Philip White
  • Olga Lyashevska
  • Ian O’Connor
Research Article

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are anthropogenic contaminants of environmental concern due to their persistence in the environment and capacity to accumulate in biota. Many of these contaminants have been found to have ill effects over wildlife and humans. Birds are known to be particularly affected through endocrine disruption and eggshell thinning. POPs have been banned or restricted through the Stockholm Convention (2001), making monitoring essential for tracking effects of regulation. Seabirds have been used as monitoring tools for being top predators and consuming a diverse array of prey in different trophic levels. Non-destructive sampling has become widely popular using feathers and preen oil, as opposed to carcasses and internal organs. This study aimed to set baseline levels of POP and PAH concentration in a highly pelagic and abundant seabird in Ireland and the Atlantic, the European storm petrel, Hydrobates pelagicus, and to investigate the profiles of contaminant congeners in preen oil and feathers, comparatively. Mean concentrations in preen oil followed: PCB (10.1 ng/g ww) > PAH (7.1 ng/g ww) > OCP (5.4 ng/g ww) > PBDE (3.9 ng/g ww), whilst mean concentrations in feathers followed the order: PAH (38.9 ng/g ww) > PCB (27.2 ng/g ww) > OCP (17.9 ng/g ww) > PBDE (4.5 ng/g ww). Congener profiles highly differed between preen oil and feathers, and little correlation was found between the matrices. These results demonstrate that the sampling of a single matrix alone (preen oil or feathers) might produce confounding results on contamination in seabirds and that more than one matrix is recommended to obtain a full picture of contamination by persistent organic pollutants.

Keywords

Persistent organic pollutants European storm petrel POPs PCBs PAHs OCPs PBDEs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Science Without Borders (CAPES, Brazil, BEX: 1269-13-5). Many thanks to BirdWatch Ireland. Thanks to Niall Keogh and Declan Manley for assistance in the field. Thanks to Danilo Hirota, Killian Coakley and Bill Delee for assistance in the lab.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1844_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

References

  1. Acampora H, White P, Lyashevska O, O’Connor I (2017) Presence of persistent organic pollutants in a breeding common tern (Sterna hirundo) population in Ireland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13025–13035.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8931-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackman RG (1989) Marine biogenic lipids, fats and oils. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. Albores-Barajas YV, Riccato F, Fiorin R, Massa B, Torricelli P, Soldatini C (2011) Diet and diving behaviour of European storm petrels Hydrobates pelagicus in the Mediterranean (ssp. melitensis). Bird Study 58:208–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2011.560244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron MG, Galbraith H, Beltman D (1995) Comparative reproductive and developmental toxicology of PCBs in birds. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 112:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrooz RD, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Bahramifar N, Covaci A (2009) Organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in feathers of birds from different trophic levels of South-West Iran. Environ Int 35:285–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond AL, Lavers JL (2013) Effectiveness of emetics to study plastic ingestion by Leach’s storm-petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa). Mar Pollut Bull 70:171–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borlakoglu JT, Wilkins JPG, Walker CH, Dils RR (1990a) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fisheating sea birds III: molecular features and metabolic interpretations of PCB isomers and congeners in adipose tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 97(1):173–177Google Scholar
  8. Borlakoglu JT, Wilkins JPG, Walker CH, Dils RR (1990b) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fisheating sea birds II: molecular features of PCB isomers and congeners in adipose tissue of male and female puffins (Fratercula arctica), guillemots (Uria aalga), shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) and cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) of British and Irish coastal waters. Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 97(1):161–171Google Scholar
  9. Bosveld ATC, van den Berg M (2002) Reproductive failure and endocrine disruption by organohalogens in fish-eating birds. Toxicology 181–182:155–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00273-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinkman UAT, De Kok A (1981) Halogenated biphenyls, terphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzodioxins and related products, production, properties and usage. In: Chemical informations, vol 12. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Bustnes JO, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Helberg M, Skaare JU (2008) The potential impact of environmental variation on the concentrations and ecological effects of pollutants in a marine avian top predator. Environ Int 34:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen D, Martin P, Burgess NM, Champoux L, Elliott JE, Forsyth DJ, Idrissi A, Letcher RJ (2013) European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) suggest that landfills are an important source of bioaccumulative flame retardants to Canadian terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:12238–12247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colabuono FI, Barquete V, Domingues BS, Montone RC (2009) Plastic ingestion by Procellariiformes in Southern Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 58:93–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connan M, Cherel Y, Mayzaud P (2007) Lipids from stomach oil of procellariiform seabirds document the importance of myctophid fish in the Southern Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2445–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’elbeei J, Hemer G (1998) Diet and foraging behaviour of the British storm petrel Hydrobates pelagicus in the Bay of Biscay during summer. Ardea 86:1–10Google Scholar
  16. Darnerud PO (2008) Brominated flame retardants as possible endocrine disrupters. Int J Androl 31:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Earley JJ (1987) Pesticides and PCBs in seabirds and coastal pollution. Biol Indic Pollut 193:200Google Scholar
  18. Elliott J, Wilson LK, Wakeford B (2005) Polybrominated diphenyl ether trends in eggs of marine and freshwater birds from British Columbia, Canada, 1979-2002. Environ Sci Technol 39:5584–5591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eng ML, Elliott JE, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Letcher RJ, Williams TD (2012) Early exposure to 2,2′,4,4′,5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-99) affects mating behavior of zebra finches. Toxicol Sci 127:269–276.  https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Espin S, Martinez-Lopez E, Maria-Mojica P, Garcia-Fernandez AJ (2012) Razorbill (Alca torda) feathers as an alternative tool for evaluating exposure to organochlorine pesticides. Ecotoxicology 21:183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0777-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falkowska L, Reindl AR, Grajewska A, Lewandowska AU (2016) Organochlorine contaminants in the muscle, liver and brain of seabirds (Larus) from the coastal area of the Southern Baltic. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 133:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.06.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Franeker JA, Bell PJ (1988) Plastic ingestion by petrels breeding in Antarctica. Mar Pollut Bull 19:672–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(88)90388-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fromant A, Carravieri A, Bustamante P, Labadie P, Budzinski H, Peluhet L, Churlaud C, Chastel O, Cherel Y (2016) Wide range of metallic and organic contaminants in various tissues of the Antarctic prion, a planktonophagous seabird from the Southern Ocean. Sci Total Environ 544:754–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furness RW (1993) Birds as monitors of pollutants. In: Furness RW, Greenwood JJD (eds) Birds as monitors of environmental change. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 86–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1322-7_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giesy JP, Ludwig JP, Tillitt DE (1994) Dioxins, dibenzofurans, PCBs and colonial, fish-eating water birds. In: Schecter A (ed) Dioxins and health. Springer US, Boston, pp 249–307.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1462-0_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbertson MMRD, Morris RD, Hunter RA (1976) Abnormal chicks and PCB residue levels in eggs of colonial birds on the Lower Great Lakes (1971-73). Auk 93:434–442Google Scholar
  27. Ginn HB, Melville DS (1983) Moult in birds (BTO guide). British Trust for Ornithology, TringGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammer S, Nager RG, Alonso S, McGill RAR, Furness RW, Dam M (2016) Legacy pollutants are declining in Great Skuas (Stercorarius skua) but remain higher in Faroe Islands than in Scotland. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 97:184–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1856-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herzke D, Anker-Nilssen T, Nøst TH, Götsch A, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Langset M, Fangel K, Koelmans AA (2016) Negligible impact of ingested microplastics on tissue concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in Northern Fulmars off Coastal Norway. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04663
  30. Jaspers V, Dauwe T, Pinxten R, Bervoets L, Blust R, Eens M (2004) The importance of exogenous contamination on heavy metal levels in bird feathers. A field experiment with free-living great tits, Parus major. J Environ Monit 6:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaspers VLB, Covaci A, Voorspoels S, Dauwe T, Eens M, Schepens P (2006a) Brominated flame retardants and organochlorine pollutants in aquatic and terrestrial predatory birds of Belgium: levels, patterns, tissue distribution and condition factors. Environ Pollut 139:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaspers VLB, Oorspoels S, Covaci A, Eens M (2006b) Can predatory bird feathers be used as a non-destructive biomonitoring tool of organic pollutants? Biol Lett 2:283–285.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaspers VLB, Covaci A, Van den Steen E, Eens M (2007a) Is external contamination with organic pollutants important for concentrations measured in bird feathers? Environ Int 33:766–772.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaspers VLB, Voorspoels S, Covaci a, Lepoint G, Eens M (2007b) Evaluation of the usefulness of bird feathers as a non-destructive biomonitoring tool for organic pollutants: a comparative and meta-analytical approach. Environ Int 33:328–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaspers VLB, Covaci A, Deleu P, Neels H, Eens M (2008) Preen oil as the main source of external contamination with organic pollutants onto feathers of the common magpie (Pica pica). Environ Int 34:741–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaspers VLB, Rodriguez FS, Boertmann D, Sonne C, Dietz R, Rasmussen LM, Eens M, Covaci A (2011) Body feathers as a potential new biomonitoring tool in raptors: a study on organohalogenated contaminants in different feather types and preen oil of West Greenland white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla). Environ Int 37:1349–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones K, de Voogt P (1999) Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science. Environ Pollut 100:209–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00098-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jörundsdóttir H, Löfstrand K, Svavarsson J, Bignert A, Bergman Å̊ (2010) Organochlorine compounds and their metabolites in seven Icelandic seabird species—a comparative study. Environ Sci Technol 44:3252–3259.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es902812x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karlsson M, Ericson I, van Bavel B, Jensen J-K, Dam M (2006) Levels of brominated flame retardants in Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) eggs from the Faroe Islands. Sci Total Environ 367:840–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knight GC, Walker CH (1982) A study of the hepatic microsomal monooxygenase of sea birds and its relationship to organochlorine pollutants. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Comp Pharmacol 73:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koeman JH, Oskamp AAG, Veen J, Brouwer E, Rooth J, Zwart P, vd Broek E, Van Genderen H (1967) Insecticides as a factor in the mortality of the sandwich tern (Sterna sandvicensis). Meded Rijksfac LandbWet Gent 32:841Google Scholar
  42. Kubiak TJ, Harris HJ, Smith LM, Schwartz TR, Stalling DL, Trick JA, Sileo L, Docherty DE, Erdman TC (1989) Microcontaminants and reproductive impairment of the Forster’s tern on Green Bay, Lake Michigan-1983. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 18:706–727.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laffon B, Fraga-Iriso R, Pérez-Cadahía B, Méndez J (2006) Genotoxicity associated to exposure to prestige oil during autopsies and cleaning of oil-contaminated birds. Food Chem Toxicol 44:1714–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ludwig JP, Colborn TL, Giesvi JP (1996) Persistent synthetic chlorinated hydrocarbons in albatross tissue samples from midway atoll. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1793–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacRae JD, Hall KJ (1998) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediment under denitrifying conditions. Water Sci Technol 38:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mallory ML, Braune BM (2012) Tracking contaminants in seabirds of Arctic Canada: temporal and spatial insights. Mar Pollut Bull 64:1475–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthies M, Solomon K, Vighi M, Gilman A, Tarazona JV (2016) The origin and evolution of assessment criteria for persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) chemicals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Environ Sci Process Impacts 18:1114–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meador JP, Stein JE, Reichert WL, Varanasi U (1995)Bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by marine organisms. In: Ware GW (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 143. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Megson D, Brown TA, Johnson GW, O’Sullivan G, Bicknell AWJ, Votier SC, Lohan MC, Comber S, Kalin R, Worsfold PJ (2014) Identifying the provenance of Leach’s storm petrels in the North Atlantic using polychlorinated biphenyl signatures derived from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 114:195–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller A, Elliott JE, Elliott KH, Guigueno MF, Wilson LK, Lee S, Idrissi A (2014) Spatial and temporal trends in brominated flame retardants in seabirds from the Pacific coast of Canada. Environ Pollut 195:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell PI, Newton SF, Ratcliffe Norman, Dunn TE (Eds) (2004) Seabird populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the seabird 2000 census (1998–2002). T and A.D. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Moore NW, Tatton J (1965) Organochlorine insecticide residues in the eggs of sea birds. Nature 207:42–43.  https://doi.org/10.1038/207042a0
  53. Nfon E, Cousins IT, Broman D (2008) Biomagnification of organic pollutants in benthic and pelagic marine food chains from the Baltic Sea. Sci Total Environ 397:190–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perkins CR, Barclay JS (1997) Accumulation and mobilization of organochlorine contaminants in wintering greater scaup. J Wildl Manag 61:444–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perugini M, Visciano P, Giammarino A, Manera M, Di Nardo W, Amorena M (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine organisms from the Adriatic Sea, Italy. Chemosphere 66:1904–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  57. Ricca MA, Miles AK, Anthony RG (2008) Sources of organochlorine contaminants and mercury in seabirds from the Aleutian archipelago of Alaska: inferences from spatial and trophic variation. Sci Total Environ 406:308–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas RJ, Medeiros RJ, Pollard AL (2006) Evidence for nocturnal inter-tidal foraging by European Storm-petrels Hydrobates pelagicus during migration. Atlantic Seabirds 8(1/2):87–96Google Scholar
  59. Roscales JL, Gonzalez-Solis J, Calabuig P, Jimenez B (2011a) Interspecies and spatial trends in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Atlantic and Mediterranean pelagic seabirds. Environ Pollut 159:2899–2905.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roscales JL, González-Solís J, Muñoz-Arnanz J, Jiménez B (2011b) Geographic and trophic patterns of OCs in pelagic seabirds from the NE Atlantic and the Mediterranean: a multi-species/multi-locality approach. Chemosphere 85:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roscales JL, González-Solís J, Zango L, Ryan PG, Jiménez B (2016) Latitudinal exposure to DDTs, HCB, PCBs, PBDEs and DP in giant petrels (Macronectes spp.) across the Southern Ocean. Environ Res 148:285–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan PG (2015) How quickly do albatrosses and petrels digest plastic particles? Environ Pollut 207:438–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Safe S, Hutzinger O (1984) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs): biochemistry, toxicology, and mechanism of action. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 13:319–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sagerup K, Helgason LB, Polder A, Strøm H, Josefsen TD, Skåre JU, Gabrielsen GW (2009) Persistent organic pollutants and mercury in dead and dying glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus) at Bjørnøya (Svalbard). Sci Total Environ 407:6009–6016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanz-Aguilar A, Massa B, Lo Valvo F, Oro D, Minguez E, Tavecchia G (2009) Contrasting age-specific recruitment and survival at different spatial scales: a case study with the European storm petrel. Ecography (Cop) 32:637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stockholm Convention (2001) Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. p. http://chm.pops.int/
  67. Stogiannidis E, Laane R (2015) Source characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons byusing their molecular indices: an overview of possibilities. In: Reviews of environmental contamination andtoxicology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 49–133Google Scholar
  68. Tanaka K, Takada H, Yamashita R, Mizukawa K, Fukuwaka M, Watanuki Y (2013) Accumulation of plastic-derived chemicals in tissues of seabirds ingesting marine plastics. Mar Pollut Bull 69:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tanaka K, Takada H, Yamashita R, Mizukawa K, Fukuwaka M, Watanuki Y (2015) Facilitated leaching of additive-derived PBDEs from plastic by seabirds’ stomach oil and accumulation in tissues. Environ Sci Technol 150901174241000:11799–11807.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trumble SJ, Robinson EM, Noren SR, Usenko S, Davis J, Kanatous SB (2012) Assessment of legacy and emerging persistent organic pollutants in Weddell seal tissue (Leptonychotes weddellii) near McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Sci Total Environ 439:275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Den Brink NW (1997) Directed transport of volatile organochlorine pollutants to polar regions: the effect of the contamination pattern of Antarctic seabirds. Sci Total Environ 198:43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05440-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Den Brink NW, Bosveld ATC (2001) PCB concentrations and metabolism patterns in common terns (Sterna hirundo) from different breeding colonies in the Netherlands. Mar Pollut Bull 42:280–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00151-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Van den Steen E, Dauwe T, Covaci A, Jaspers VLB, Pinxten R, Eens M (2006) Within-and among-clutch variation of organohalogenated contaminants in eggs of great tits (Parus major). Environ Pollut 144:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Franeker JA, Blaize C, Danielsen J, Fairclough K, Gollan J, Guse N, Hansen PL, Heubeck M, Jensen JK, Le Guillou G, Olsen B, Olsen KO, Pedersen J, Stienen EWM, Turner DM (2011) Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea. Environ Pollut 159:2609–2615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walker CH (1990) Persistent pollutants in fish-eating sea birds—bioaccumulation, metabolism and effects. Aquat Toxicol 17:293–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(90)90014-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wan Y, Jin X, Hu J, Jin F (2007) Trophic dilution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a marine food web from Bohai Bay, North China. Environ Sci Technol 41:3109–3114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang J, Caccamise SAL, Woodward LA, Li QX (2015) Polychlorinated biphenyls in the plasma and preen oil of black-footed albatross (Diomedea nigripes) chicks and adults on midway atoll, North Pacific Ocean. PLoS One 10:e0123041.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Webster L, McIntosh AD, Moffat CF, Dalgarno EJ, Brown NA, Fryer RJ (2000) Analysis of sediments from Shetland Island voes for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, steranes and triterpanes. J Environ Monit 2:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. White P, McHugh B, Poole R, McGovern E, White J, Behan P, Foley B, Covaci A (2014) Application of congener based multi-matrix profiling techniques to identify potential PCDD/F sources in environmental samples from the Burrishoole catchment in the west of Ireland. Environ Pollut 184:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Winter V, Williams TD, Elliott JE (2013) A three-generational study of in ovo exposure to PBDE-99 in the zebra finch. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yamashita R, Takada H, Murakami M, Fukuwaka MA, Watanuki Y (2007) Evaluation of noninvasive approach for monitoring PCB pollution of seabirds using preen gland oil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:4901–4906.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0701863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine and Freshwater Research CentreGalway-Mayo Institute of TechnologyGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations