Modelling equilibrium adsorption of single, binary, and ternary combinations of Cu, Pb, and Zn onto granular activated carbon

  • Paripurnanda Loganathan
  • Wang Geun Shim
  • Danious Pratheep Sounthararajah
  • Mahatheva Kalaruban
  • Tanjina Nur
  • Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
Research Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Elevated concentrations of heavy metals in water can be toxic to humans, animals, and aquatic organisms. A study was conducted on the removal of Cu, Pb, and Zn by a commonly used water treatment adsorbent, granular activated carbon (GAC), from three single, three binary (Cu-Pb, Cu-Zn, Pb-Zn), and one ternary (Cu-Pb-Zn) combination of metals. It also investigated seven mathematical models on their suitability to predict the metals adsorption capacities. Adsorption of Cu, Pb, and Zn increased with pH with an abrupt increase in adsorption at around pH 5.5, 4.5, and 6.0, respectively. At all pHs tested (2.5–7.0), the adsorption capacity followed the order Pb > Cu > Zn. The Langmuir and Sips models fitted better than the Freundlich model to the data in the single-metal system at pH 5. The Langmuir maximum adsorption capacities of Pb, Cu, and Zn (mmol/g) obtained from the model’s fits were 0.142, 0.094, and 0.058, respectively. The adsorption capacities (mmol/g) for these metals at 0.01 mmol/L equilibrium liquid concentration were 0.130, 0.085, and 0.040, respectively. Ideal Adsorbed Solution (IAS)-Langmuir and IAS-Sips models fitted well to the binary and ternary metals adsorption data, whereas the Extended Langmuir and Extended Sips models’ fits to the data were poor. The selectivity of adsorption followed the same order as the metals’ capacities and affinities of adsorption in the single-metal systems.

Keywords

Adsorption modelling Heavy metal adsorption Ideal adsorption solution theory Granular activated carbon Metal adsorption competition 

References

  1. Ahmaruzzaman M (2011) Industrial wastes as low-costpotential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 166:36–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Asheh S, Banat F, Al-Omari R, Duvnjak Z (2000) Predictions of binary sorption isotherms for the sorption of heavy metals by pine bark using single isotherm data. Chemosphere 41:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An HK, Park BY, Kim DS (2001) Crab shell for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution. Water Res 35(15):3551–3556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baily SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Wat Res 33:2469–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung CW, Ko DCK, Porter JF, McKay G (2003) Binary metal sorption on bone char mass transport model using IAST. Langmuir 19:4144–4153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corapcioglu MO, Huang CP (1987) The adsorption of heavy metals onto hydrous activated carbon. Wat Res 21:1031–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cougnaud A, Faur C, Le Cloirec P (2005) Removal of pesticides from aqueous solution: quantitative relationship between activated carbon characteristics and adsorption properties. Environ Technol 26:857–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dzombak DA, Morel FMM (1986) Sorption of cadmium on hydrous ferric oxide at high sorbate/sorbent ratios: equilibrium, kinetics, and modelling. J Colloid Interf Sci 112:588–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott HA, Huang CP (1979) The effect of complex formation on the adsorption characteristics of heavy metals. Environ Int 2:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erto A, Di Natale F, Musmarra D, Lancia A (2015) Modeling of single and competitive adsorption of cadmium and zinc onto activated carbon. Adsorption 21:611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freundlich H (1932) Of the adsorption gases. Section II. Kinetics and energies of gas adsorption. Introductory paper to section II. Trans Faraday Soc 28:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a review. J Environ Manag 92:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabaldon C, Marzal P, Ferrer J, Seco A (1996) Single and competitive adsorption of Cd and Zn onto granular activated carbon. Water Res 30:3050–3060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Genc-Fuhrman H, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A (2007) Simultaneous removal of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn from stormwater: experimental comparison of 11 different sorbents. Water Res 41:591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giraldo L, Erto A, Moreno-Pirajan JC (2013) Magnetite nanoparticles for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: synthesis and characterisation. Adsorption 19:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosize metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater 211-212:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James RO, Healy TW (1972) Adsorption of hydrolysable metal ions at the oxide-water interface. III. A thermodynamic model for adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 40:65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang K, Lee C, Choi J, Kim Y (2016) Evaluation of the use of sea sand, crushed concrete and bentonite to stabilize trace metals and to interrupt their release from contaminated marine sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karapinar N (2016) Removal of heavy metal ions by ferrihydrite: an opportunity to the treatment of acid mine drainage. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ko DCK, Cheung CW, Choy KKH, Porter JF, McKay G (2004) Sorption equilibria of metal ions on bone char. Chemosphere 54:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lakherwal D, Rattan VK, Singh HP (2016) Studies on adsorption of nickel by activated carbon in a liquid fluidised reactor. Can Chem Trans 4:121–132Google Scholar
  22. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee DH, Moon H (2001) Adsorption equilibrium of heavy metals on natural zeolites. Korean J Chem Eng 18:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Wang C, Liu J, Wang B, Sun H (2013) Competitive adsorption of Cd(II), Zn(II) and Ni(II) from their binary and ternary acidic systems using tourmaline. J Environ Manag 128:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Naidu R (2012) Cadmium sorption and desorption in soils: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:489–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minceva M, Markovska L, Meshko V (2007) Removal of Zn2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ from binary aqueous solution by natural zeolite and granular activated carbon. Maced J Chem Chem Eng 26:125–134Google Scholar
  27. Myers AL, Prausnitz JM (1965) Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. Am Inst Chem Eng J 11:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naidu G, Loganathan P, Jeong S, Johir MAH, Phuong VH, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S (2016) Rubidium extraction using an organic polymer encapsulated potassium copper hexacyanoferrate sorbent. Chem Eng J 306:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nguyen TC, Loganathan P, Nguyen TV, Kandasamy J, Naidu R, Vigneswaran S (2017) Adsorptive removal of five heavy metals from water using blast furnace slag and fly ash. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s1356-017-9610-4
  30. Noh JS, Schwarz JA (1990) Effect of HNO3 treatment on the surface acidity of activated carbons. Carbon 28:675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oh S, Kwak MY, Shin WS (2009) Competitive sorption of lead and cadmium onto sediments. Chem Eng J 152:376–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Papageorgiou SK, Katsaros FK, Kouvelos EP, Kanellopoulos NK (2009) Prediction of binary adsorption isotherms of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ on calcium alginate beads from single adsorption data. J Hazard Mater 162:1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pawluk K, Fronczyk J (2015) Evaluation of single and multilayered reactive zones for heavy metals removal from stormwater. Environ Technol 36:1576–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Radke CJ, Prausnitz JM (1972) Thermodynamics of multi-solute adsorption from dilute liquid solution. AIChE 18:761–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riggs JB (1988) An introduction to numerical methods for chemical engineers. Texas Tech Univ Press, LubbockGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheidegger AM, Lamble GM, Sparks DL (1997) Spectroscopic evidence for the formation of mixed-cation, hydroxide phases upon metal sorption on clays and aluminium oxides. J Colloid Interf Sci 186:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sellaoui L, Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S, Lima EC, Dotto GL, Ben Lamine A, Erto A (2017) New sights into single-compound and binary adsorption of copper and lead ions on a treated sea mango shell: experimental and theoretical studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:25927–25937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellaoui L, Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S, Benguerba Y, Dotto GL, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Rodrigues AE, Ben Lamine A, Erto A (2018) Equilibrium study of single and binary adsorption of lead and mercury on bentonite-alginate composite: experimental investigation and application of two theoretical approaches. J Mol Liq 253:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shanmuganathan S, Loganathan P, Kazner C, Johir MAH, Vigneswaran S (2017) Submerged membrane filtration adsorption hybrid system for the removal of organic micropollutants from a water reclamation plant reverse osmosis concentrate. Desalination 401:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sips R (1948) On the structure of a catalyst surface. J Chem Phys 16:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sounthararajah DP, Loganathan P, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S (2015a) Adsorptive removal of heavy metals from water using sodium titanate nanofibers loaded onto GAC in fixed-bed columns. J Hazard Mater 287:306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sounthararajah DP, Loganathan P, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S (2015b) Effects of humic acid and suspended solids on the removal of heavy metals from water by adsorption onto granular activated carbon. Inter J Environ Res Public Health 12:10475–10489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sparks DL (2000) New frontiers in elucidating the kinetics and mechanisms of metal and oxyanion sorption at the soil mineral/water interface. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tien C (1994) Adsorption calculations and modelling. Butterworth-Heinemann, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu Y, Yilihan P, Cao J, Jin Y (2013) Competitive adsorption of Cr(VI) and Ni(II) onto coconut shell activated carbon in single and binary systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yin CY, Aroua MK, Daud WMAW (2007) Review of modifications of activated carbon for enhancing contaminant uptakes from aqueous solutions. Sep Purif Technol 52:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paripurnanda Loganathan
    • 1
  • Wang Geun Shim
    • 2
  • Danious Pratheep Sounthararajah
    • 1
  • Mahatheva Kalaruban
    • 1
  • Tanjina Nur
    • 1
  • Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Technology Sydney (UTS)SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Polymer Science and EngineeringSunchon National UniversitySuncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations