Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the nanoparticle emissions from a laser printer in a chamber in conjunction with emissions from printers in a print room (PR) and to characterize the processes that lead to increased nanoparticle concentrations, as well as to estimate the human particle dose of the printers’ users. Measurements were conducted in a small stainless steel environmental chamber under controlled conditions, where the evolution of particle size distributions (PSDs) with time and printed pages was studied in detail. Printer was generating nanoparticles (vast majority ˂ 50 nm with mode on ~ 15 nm) primarily during cold startup. Previously, 1-week sampling was also done in a PR at the Technical University of Crete, where the tested laser printer is installed along with three other printers. Similarly, as it was observed in the chamber study, printers’ startup on any given day was characterized by a sharp increase in particle number (PN) concentrations. Average measured PN concentrations during printing hours in PR (5.4 × 103 #/cm3) is similar to the one observed in chamber measurements (6.7 × 103 #/cm3). The ExDoM2 dosimetry model was further applied to calculate the deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract. More precisely, the increase in particle dose for an adult Caucasian male was 14.6- and 24.1-fold at printers’ startup, and 1.2- and 5.2-fold during printing in the PR and experimental chamber, respectively, compared to the exposure dose at background concentrations (BCs).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aleksandropoulou V, Lazaridis M (2013) Development and application of a model (ExDoM) for calculating the respiratory tract dose and retention of particles under variable exposure conditions. Air Qual Atmos Health 6(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-010-0126-z
Barthel M, Pedan V, Hahn O, Rothhardt M, Bresch H, Jann O, Seeger S (2011) XRF-analysis of fine and ultrafine particles emitted from laser printing devices. Environ Sci Technol 45(18):7819–7825. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201590q
Bekö G, Clausen G, Weschler CJ (2008) Is the use of particle air filtration justified? Costs and benefits of filtration with regard to health effects, building cleaning and occupant productivity. Build Environ 43(10):1647–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.006
Bello D, Martin J, Santeufemio C, Sun Q, Lee Bunker K, Shafer M, Demokritou P (2013) Physicochemical and morphological characterisation of nanoparticles from photocopiers: implications for environmental health. Nanotoxicology 7(5):989–1003. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.689883
Britigan N, Alshawa A, Nizkorodov SA (2006) Quantification of indoor ozone levels in indoor environments generated by ionization and ozonolysis air purifiers. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 56(5):601–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464467
Castellano P, Canepari S, Ferrante R, L'Episcopo N (2012) Multiparametric approach for an exemplary study of laser printer emissions. J Environ Monit 14(2):446–454. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em10696e
Chalvatzaki E, Lazaridis M (2015) Development and application of a dosimetry model (ExDoM2) for calculating internal dose of specific particle-bound metals in the human body. Inhal Toxicol 27(6):308–320. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2015.1046201
Chatoutsidou SE, Serfozo N, Glytsos T, Lazaridis M (2017) Multi-zone measurement of particle concentrations in a HVAC building with massive printer emissions: influence of human occupation and particle transport indoors. Air Qual Atmos Health 10(6):679–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0461-4
Coleman BK, Lunden MM, Destaillats H, Nazaroff WW (2008) Secondary organic aerosol from ozone-initiated reactions with terpene-rich household products. Atmos Environ 42(35):8234–8245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.031
Destaillats H, Maddalena RL, Singer BC, Hodgson AT, McKone TE (2008) Indoor pollutants emitted by office equipment: a review of reported data and information needs. Atmos Environ 42:1371−1388
Dhawan A, Sharma V (2010) Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem 398(2):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x
Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A (2006) Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 92(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj130
Glytsos T, Ondráček J, Džumbová L, Kopanakis I, Lazaridis M (2015) Characterization of particulate matter concentrations during controlled indoor activities. Atmos Environ 44:1539–1549
Gminski R, Decker K, Heinz C, Seidel A, Könczöl M, Goldenberg E, Grobéty B, Ebner W, Gieré R, Mersch-Sundermann V (2011) Genotoxic effects of three selected black toner powders and their dimethyl sulfoxide extracts in cultured human epithelial A549 lung cells in vitro. Environ Mol Mutagen 52(4):296–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20621
Hariri A, Leman AM, Yusof MZM (2013) Experimental study on welding fumes exposure from aluminum metal inert gas (MIG) process. Adv Mat Res 701:382–386
He C, Morawska L, Taplin L (2007) Particle emission characteristics of office printers. Environ Sci Technol 41:6039−6045
He C, Morawska L, Wang H, Jayaratne R, McGarry P, Johnson G, Bostrom T, Gonthier J, Authemayou S, Ayoko G (2010) Quantification of the relationship between fuser roller temperature and laser printer emissions. J Aerosol Sci 41:523−530
Huang Y, Ho KF, Ho SSH, Lee SC, Yau PS, Cheng Y (2011) Physical parameters effect on ozone-initiated formation of indoor secondary organic aerosols with emissions from cleaning products. J Hazard Mater 192(3):1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.014
Hussein T, Wierzbicka A, Londahl J, Lazaridis M, Hanninen O (2015) Indoor aerosol modeling for assessment of exposure and respiratory tract deposited dose. Atmos Environ 106:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.034
ICRP (2012) Occupational intakes of radionuclides. Ann. ICRP. Publication in advanced Drafting. http://www.icrp.org/docs/Occupational_Intakes_P1_for_consultation.pdf. Accessed 01 Jun 2017
Kagi N, Fujii S, Horiba Y, Namiki N, Ohtani Y, Emi H, Tamura H, Kim YS (2007) Indoor air quality for chemical and ultrafine particle contaminants from printers. Build Environ 42:1949−1954
Karrasch S, Simon M, Herbig B, Langner J, Seeger S, Kronseder A, Peters S, Dietrich-Gümperlein G, Schierl R, Nowak D, Jörres RA (2017) Health effects of laser printer emissions: a controlled exposure study. Indoor Air 27(4):753–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12366
Khatri M, Bello D, Gaines P, Martin J, Pal AK, Gore R, Woskie S (2013) Nanoparticles from photocopiers induce oxidative stress and upper respiratory tract inflammation in healthy volunteers. Nanotoxicology 7(5):1014–1027. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.691998
Khatri M, Bello D, Martin J, Bello A, Gore R, Demokritou P, Gaines P (2017) Chronic upper airway inflammation and systemic oxidative stress from nanoparticles in photocopier operators: mechanistic insights. NanoImpact 5:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.01.007
Koivisto AJ, Hussein T, Niemelä R, Tuomi T, Hämeri K (2010) Impact of particle emissions of new laser printers on modeled office room. Atmos Environ 44(17):2140–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.023
Lee CW, Hsu DJ (2007) Measurements of fine and ultrafine particles formation in photocopy centers in Taiwan. Atmos Environ 41(31):6598–6609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.016
Lee SC, Lam S, Kin FH (2001) Characterization of VOCs, ozone, and PM10 emissions from office equipment in an environmental chamber. Build Environ 36:837−842
McGarry P, Morawska L, He C, Jayaratne R, Falk M, Tran Q, Wang H (2011) Exposure to particles from laser printers operating within office workplaces. Environ Sci Technol 45(15):6444–6452. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200249n
Morawska L, He CR, Johnson G et al (2009) An investigation into the characteristics and formation mechanisms of particles originating from the operation of laser printers. Environ Sci Technol 43:1015−1022
Muller J, Huaux F, Moreau N, Misson P, Heilier JF, Delos M, Arras M, Fonseca A, Nagy JB, Lison D (2005) Respiratory toxicity of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Toxicol Appl Pharm 207(3):221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.008
Niu J, Tung TCW, Burnett J (2001) Ozone emission rate testing and ranking method using environmental chamber. Atmos Environ 35(12):2143–2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00483-0
Nørgaard AW, Kudal AW, Kofoed-Sørensen V, Koponen IK, Wolkoff P (2014) Ozone-initiated VOC and particle emissions from a cleaning agent and an air freshener: risk assessment of acute airway effects. Environ Int 68:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.029
Pirela SV, Miousse IR, Lu X, Castranova V, Thomas T, Qian Y, Bello D, Kobzik L, Koturbash I, Demokritou P (2016) Effects of laser printer–emitted engineered nanoparticles on cytotoxicity, chemokine expression, reactive oxygen species, DNA methylation, and DNA damage: a comprehensive in vitro analysis in human small airway epithelial cells, macrophages, and lymphoblasts. Environ Health Persp 124:210–219
Pitz M, Cyrys J, Karg E, Wiedensohler A, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J (2003) Variability of apparent particle density of an urban aerosol. Environ Sci Technol 37(19):4336–4342. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034322p
Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W, Donaldson K (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 3(7):423–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.111
Schripp T, Wensing M, Uhde E, Salthammer T, He C, Morawska L (2008) Evaluation of ultrafine particle emissions from laser printers using emission test chambers. Environ Sci Technol 42(12):4338–4343. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702426m
Scungio M, Vitanza T, Stabile L, Buonanno G, Morawska L (2017) Characterization of particle emission from laser printers. Sci Total Environ 586:623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.030
Shi X, Chen R, Huo L, Zhao L, Bai R, Long D, Pui DYH, Rang W, Chen C (2015) Evaluation of nanoparticles emitted from printers in a clean chamber, a copy center and office rooms: health risks of indoor air quality. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15(12):9554–9564. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.10314
Sisler JD, Pirela SV, Friend S, Farcas M, Schwegler-Berry D, Shvedova A, Castranova V, Demokritou P, Qian Y (2015) Small airway epithelial cells exposure to printer-emitted engineered nanoparticles induces cellular effects on human microvascular endothelial cells in an alveolar-capillary co-culture model. Nanotoxicology 9(6):769–779. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.976603
Smolík J, Lazaridis M, Moravec P, Schwarz J, Zaripov SK, Ždímal V (2005) Indoor aerosol particle deposition in an empty office. Water Air Soil Poll 165(1-4):301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-7146-6
Sultan ZM (2007) Estimates of associated outdoor particulate matter health risk and costs reductions from alternative building, ventilation and filtration scenarios. Sci Total Environ 377(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.090
Tang T, Hurraß J, Gminski R, Mersch-Sundermann V (2012) Fine and ultrafine particles emitted from laser printers as indoor air contaminants in German offices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(9):3840–3849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0647-5
Uhde E, Borgschulte A, Salthammer T (1998) Characterization of the field and laboratory emission cell – FLEC: flow field and air velocities. Atmos Environ 32(4):773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00345-2
Voliotis A, Karali I, Kouras A, Samara C (2017) Fine and ultrafine particle doses in the respiratory tract from digital printing operations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:3027−3037
Wang ZM, Wagner J, Wall S (2011) Characterization of laser printer nanoparticle and VOC emissions, formation mechanisms, and strategies to reduce airborne exposures. Aerosol Sci Technol 45(9):1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.580799
Wang H, He C, Morawska L, McGarry P, Johnson G (2012) Ozone-initiated particle formation, particle aging, and precursors in a laser printer. Environ Sci Technol 46(2):704–712. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203066k
Wensing M, Schripp T, Uhde E, Salthammer T (2008) Ultra-fine particles release from hardcopy devices: sources, real-room measurements and efficiency of filter accessories. Sci Total Environ 407(1):418–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.018
Wolkoff P, Cornelius KW, Clausen PA, Larsen K (1993) Comparison of volatile organic compounds from processed paper and toners from office copiers and printers: methods, emission rates, and modeled concentrations. Indoor Air 3:113–123
Acknowledgements
The present work was supported by the European Union 7th framework program HEXACOMM FP7/2007-2013 under grant agreement no. 315760. The authors would like to thank the staff of the IT & Communications Center of Technical University of Crete (Chania, Greece) for cooperation during the field study, and for providing the printer and printing statistics data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serfozo, N., Ondráček, J., Glytsos, T. et al. Evaluation of nanoparticle emissions from a laser printer in an experimental chamber and estimation of the human particle dose. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 13103–13117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1448-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1448-x