Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 10848–10856 | Cite as

Management of tannery wastewater for improving growth attributes and reducing chromium uptake in spinach through citric acid application

  • Arosha Maqbool
  • Shafaqat Ali
  • Muhammad Rizwan
  • Wajid Ishaque
  • Nasir Rasool
  • Muhammad Zia ur Rehman
  • Arooj Bashir
  • Muhammad Abid
  • Longhua Wu
Research Article

Abstract

The use of chromium (Cr)-contaminated tannery wastewater for irrigation is a common practice, especially in developing countries like Pakistan. This practice is due to the shortage of good quality irrigation water for crop growth as well as the issue of tannery wastewater disposal. The current study was done to evaluate the effect of citric acid (CA) (0, 1.0, and 2.0 mM) on the growth and Cr uptake by spinach irrigated with different mixtures of tap water and tannery wastewater (100:0, 50:50, and 0:100 tap water to wastewater ratio). Plants were grown for 8 weeks under ambient conditions. Results showed that 50:50% tap water and wastewater increased plant height, dry weights of shoots and roots, total chlorophyll contents, and gas exchange attributes than the plants treated with only tap water or only wastewater. Increasing wastewater ratio increased electrolyte leakage (EL) in plants and enhanced the leaf key antioxidant enzyme activities as well as increased Cr contents. Foliar application of CA increased the plant dry weights, photosynthesis, and enzyme activities, whereas reduced the EL and Cr concentrations in plants than respective treatments without CA application. It can be concluded that 50:50 tap water and wastewater irrigation along with foliar CA application might be an effective strategy for increasing vegetable growth with reduced metal concentrations.

Keywords

Antioxidants Chromium Oxidative stress Photosynthesis Wastewater irrigation 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financed by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan and Government College University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshan S, Ali S, Bharwana SA, Rizwan M, Farid M, Abbas F, Ibrahim M, Mehmood MA, Abbasi GH (2015) Citric acid enhances the phytoextraction of chromium, plant growth, and photosynthesis by alleviating the oxidative damages in Brassica napus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(15):11679–11689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4396-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akhtar N, Inam A, Inam A, Khan NA (2012) Effects of city wastewater on the characteristics of wheat with varying doses of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Recent Res Sci Technol 4:18–29Google Scholar
  4. Ali B, Gill RA, Yang S, Gill MB, Ali S, Rafiq MT, Zhou W (2014) Hydrogen sulfide alleviates cadmium-induced morpho-physiological and ultrastructural changes in Brassica napus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 110:197–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alia N, Sardar K, Said M, Salma K, Sadia A, Sadaf S, Toqeer A, Miklas S (2015) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) grown in a controlled environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(7):7400–7416.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120707400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anwar S, Nawaz MF, Gul S, Rizwan M, Ali S, Kareem A (2016) Uptake and distribution of minerals and heavy metals in commonly grown leafy vegetable species irrigated with sewage water. Environ Monitor Assess 188:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, (DC), pp 1–874Google Scholar
  8. Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1985) Water quality for agriculture, pp. 95-97Google Scholar
  9. Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron J 54(5):464–465.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S (1998) Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci 135(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehsan S, Ali S, Noureen S, Mahmood K, Farid M, Ishaque W, Shakoor MB, Rizwan M (2014) Citric acid assisted phytoremediation of cadmium by Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 106:164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farid M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Abbas F, Bukhari SA, Saeed R, Wu L (2017) Citric acid assisted phytoextraction of chromium by sunflower; morpho-physiological and biochemical alterations in plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 145:90–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill RA, Zang L, Ali B, Farooq MA, Cui P, Yang S, Ali S, Zhou W (2015) Chromium-induced physio-chemical and ultrastructural changes in four cultivars of Brassica napus L. Chemosphere 120:154–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill RA, Zhang N, Ali B, Farooq MA, Xu J, Gill MB, Mao B, Zhou W (2016) Role of exogenous salicylic acid in regulating physio-morphic and molecular changes under chromium toxicity in black-and yellow-seeded Brassica napus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(20):20483–20496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7167-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomes MAD, Hauser-Davis RA, Suzuki MS, Vitória AP (2017) Plant chromium uptake and transport, physiological effects and recent advances in molecular investigations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 140:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller C, Rizwan M, Davidian JC, Pokrovsky OS, Bovet N, Chaurand P, Meunier JD (2015) Effect of silicon on wheat seedlings (Triticum turgidum L.) grown in hydroponics and exposed to 0 to 30 μM Cu. Planta 241(4):847–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-014-2220-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khalid S, Shahid M, Dumat C, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Gul Bakhat HF, Abbas G, Murtaza B, Javeed HM (2017) Influence of groundwater and wastewater irrigation on lead accumulation in soil and vegetables: implications for health risk assessment and phytoremediation. Int J Phytorem 19(11):1037–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1319330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan A, Khan S, Khan MA, Qamar Z, Waqas M (2015) The uptake and bioaccumulation of heavy metals by food plants, their effects on plants nutrients, and associated health risk: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:13772–13799Google Scholar
  19. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (ed) Methods Enzymol 148:350–382, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
  20. Ma J, Lv C, Xu M, Chen G, Lv C, Gao Z (2016) Photosynthesis performance, antioxidant enzymes, and ultrastructural analyses of rice seedlings under chromium stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1768–1778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5439-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murtaza G, Ghafoor A, Qadir M, Owens G, Aziz M, Zia M (2010) Disposal and use of sewage on agricultural lands in Pakistan: a review. Pedosphere 20(1):23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60279-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeny DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis (Part 2). Chemical andmicrobiological properties. Agron. 9. SSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rehman MZ, Rizwan M, Ghafoor A, Naeem A, Ali S, Sabir M, Qayyum MF (2015) Effect of inorganic amendments for in situ stabilization of cadmium in contaminated soils and its phyto-availability to wheat and rice under rotation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16897–16906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rehman MZ, Khalid H, Akmal F, Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Iqbal M, Khalid MU, Azhar M (2017) Effect of limestone, lignite and biochar applied alone and combined on cadmium uptake in wheat and rice under rotation in an effluent irrigated field. Environ Pollut 227:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rizwan M, Ali S, Adrees M, Rizvi H, Rehman MZ, Hannan F, Qayyum MF, Hafeez F, Ok YS (2016a) Cadmium stress in rice: toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and management: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:17859–17879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rizwan M, Meunier JD, Davidian JC, Pokrovsky OS, Bovet N, Keller C (2016b) Silicon alleviates Cd stress of wheat seedlings (Triticum turgidum L. cv. Claudio) grown in hydroponics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1414–1427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5351-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rizwan M, Ali S, Adrees M, Ibrahim M, Tsang DC, Rehman MZ, Zahir ZA, Rinklebe J, Tack FM, Ok YS (2017) A critical review on effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of cadmium in vegetables. Chemosphere 182:90–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez E, Santos C, Azevedo R, Moutinho-Pereira J, Correia C, Dias MC (2012) Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. Plant Physiol Biochem 53:94–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Jones DJ (2001) Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:527–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shahid M, Shamshad S, Rafiq M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Dumat C, Rashid MI (2017) Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: a review. Chemosphere 178:513–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh A, Sharma RK, Agrawal M, Marshall FM (2010) Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food Chem Toxicol 48(2):611–619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh PK, Deshbhratar PB, Ramteke DS (2012) Effects of sewage wastewater irrigation on soil properties, crop yield and environment. Agric Water Manag 103:100–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soltanpour PN (1985) Use of AB-DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16(3):323–338.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture handbook 60. United States Salinity Laboratory, USDA, Washington DC, p 160Google Scholar
  35. Wang S, Dong Q, Wang Z (2017) Differential effects of citric acid on cadmium uptake and accumulation between tall fescue and Kentucky bluegrass. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 145:200–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yaseen M, Aziz MZ, Jafar AA, Naveed M, Saleem M (2016) Use of textile waste water along with liquid NPK fertilizer for production of wheat on saline sodic soils. Int J Phytorem 18(5):502–508.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1109596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yaseen M, Aziz MZ, Komal A, Naveed M (2017) Management of textile wastewater for improving growth and yield of field mustard (Brassica campestris L.) Int J Phytorem 19(9):798–804.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1284757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yasmeen T, Ali Q, Islam F, Noman A, Akram MS, Javed MT (2014) Biologically treated wastewater fertigation induced growth and yield enhancement effects in Vigna radiata L. Agric Water Manag 146:124–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Younis U, Malik SA, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Shah MH, Rehman RA, Ahmad N (2016) Biochar enhances the cadmium tolerance in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) through modification of cd uptake and physiological and biochemical attributes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):21385–21394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7344-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaheer IE, Ali S, Rizwan M, Farid M, Shakoor MB, Gill RA, Najeeb U, Iqbal N, Ahmad R (2015) Citric acid assisted phytoremediation of copper by Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 120:310–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang XZ (1992) The measurement and mechanism of lipid peroxidation and SOD, POD and CAT activities in biological system. In: Zhang XZ (ed) Research methodology of crop physiology. Agriculture press, Beijing, pp 208–211Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution RemediationInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  3. 3.Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB)FaisalabadPakistan
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  5. 5.Institute of Soil & Environmental SciencesUniversity of Agriculture FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan
  6. 6.Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Production ManagementNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations