Multi-perspective comparisons and mitigation implications of SO2 and NO x discharges from the industrial sector of China: a decomposition analysis
This study is the first attempt to investigate the drivers of Chinese industrial SO2 and NO x emissions from both periodic and structural perspectives through a decomposition analysis using the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI). The two pollutants’ emissions were decomposed into output effects, structural effects, clean production effects, and pollution abatement effects. The results showed that China’s industrial SO2 discharge increased by 1.14 Mt during 2003–2014, and the contributions from the four effects were 23.17, − 1.88, − 3.80, and − 16.36 Mt, respectively. Likewise, NO x discharge changed by − 3.44 Mt over 2011–2014, and the corresponding contributions from the four effects were 2.97, − 0.62, − 1.84, and − 3.95 Mt. Thus, the output effect was mainly responsible for the growth of the two discharges. The average annual contribution rates of SO2 and NO x from output were 14.33 and 5.97%, respectively, but pollution abatement technology presented the most obvious mitigating effects (− 10.11 and − 7.92%), followed by the mitigating effects of clean production technology (− 2.35 and − 3.7%), and the mitigation from the structural effect was the weakest (− 1.16 and − 1.25%, respectively), which meant pollutant reduction policies related to industrial structure adjustment should be a long-term measure for the two discharges. In addition, the sub-sectors of I20 (manufacture of raw chemical materials and chemical products), I24 (manufacture of non-metallic mineral products), and I26 (smelting and pressing of non-ferrous metals) were the major contributors to both discharges. Thus, these sub-sectors should be given priority consideration when designing mitigation-related measures. Last, some particular policy implications were recommended for reducing the two discharges, including that the government should seek a technological discharge reduction route.
KeywordsMulti-perspective Decomposition analysis Industrial SO2 and NOx discharges LMDI China
We thank the anonymous reviewers for providing helpful suggestions.
JS. J. and DM. X. designed the research. ZH. G., ZY. G., and CD. C. performed it and analyzed the result. JS. J. and ZH. G. wrote the text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are also grateful for the financial support provided by the Chinese National Science Foundation (41001383, 71473113, 31360120, 51408584), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi (20151BAB203040), and Scientific or Technological Research Project of Jiangxi’s Education Department (GJJ14266).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ang BW (1999) Decomposition methodology in energy demand and environmental analysis. In: van den Bergh JCJM (ed) Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Cellura M, Longo S, Mistretta M (2012) Application of the structural decomposition analysis to assess the indirect energy consumption and air emission changes related to Italian households consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(2):1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, He L, Guan Y, Lu H, Li J (2017) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and water-energy optimization for shale gas supply chain planning based on multi-level approach: case study in Barnett, Marcellus, Fayetteville, and Haynesville shales. Energy Convers Manag 134:382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fraley, M.; Le, K.; Martin, J. 2006. Tools for optimizing SO2/NOx emission strategies for first energy. In 2006 power engineering society general meeting, vols 1-9, IEEE: New York; pp 4059–4059Google Scholar
- Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement; working paper no. 3914. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Hatzigeorgiou E, Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D (2008) CO2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: a decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the arithmetic mean Divisia index and logarithmic mean Divisia index techniques. Energy 33(3):492–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J. 2014b. Factor decomposition of carbon productivity change in China’s main industries: based on the Laspeyre’s decomposition method. In International conference on applied energy, icae2014, Yan, J.; Lee, D.J.; Chou, S.K.; Desideri, U.; Li, H., Eds; Vol. 61, pp 1893–1896Google Scholar
- McDonald-Buller E, Kimura Y, Craig M, McGaughey G, Allen D, Webster M (2016) Dynamic management of NOx and SO2 emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic electric power systems and implications for air quality. Environ Sci Technol 50(3):1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muller N, Tong D, Mendelsohn R (2009) Regulating NOx and SO2 emissions in Atlanta. B E J Econ Anal Policy 9Google Scholar
- Pinkerton JE (2014) Trends in pulp and paper mill emissions of SO2 and NOx, 1980-2010. TAPPI J 13:9–14Google Scholar
- Popp D (2006) International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOx and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. JEnvironEconManage 51:46–71Google Scholar
- Shao S, Yang LL, Gan CH, Cao JH, Geng Y, Guan DB (2016) Using an extended LMDI model to explore techno-economic drivers of energy-related industrial CO2 emission changes: a case study for Shanghai (China). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:516–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, Cheung TF, Li YS, Yu XM, Blake DR (2002) Emission characteristics of CO, NOx, SO2 and indications of biomass burning observed at a rural site in eastern China. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 107Google Scholar
- Washenfelder RA, Trainer M, Frost GJ, Ryerson TB, Atlas EL, de Gouw JA, Flocke FM, Fried A, Holloway JS, Parrish DD, Peischl J, Richter D, Schauffler SM, Walega JG, Warneke C, Weibring P, Zheng W (2010) Characterization of NOx, SO2, ethene, and propene from industrial emission sources in Houston, Texas. J Geophys Res-Atmos 115(D16). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013645
- Xinhua News Agency 2016. National economic and social development report of the People’s Republic of China 13th five-year-plan outline. Available online: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016lh/2016-03/17/c111836632 2.htm (accessed on 20 May 2016)
- Yang L, Stulen I, De Kok LJ, Zheng Y (2002) SO2, NOx and acid deposition problems in China impact on agriculture. Phyton-Ann REI Bot 42:255–264Google Scholar