Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 9461–9473 | Cite as

Modeling the impact of transport energy consumption on CO2 emission in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL approach

Research Article
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine the relationship between transport energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emission (CO2) from transport sector incorporating foreign direct investment and urbanization. This study is carried out in Pakistan by applying autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) and vector error correction model (VECM) over 1990–2015. The empirical results indicate a strong significant impact of transport energy consumption on CO2 emissions from the transportation sector. Furthermore, foreign direct investment also contributes to CO2 emission. Interestingly, the impact of economic growth and urbanization on transport CO2 emission is statistically insignificant. Overall, transport energy consumption and foreign direct investment are not environmentally friendly. The new empirical evidence from this study provides a complete picture of the determinants of emissions from the transport sector and these novel findings not only help to advance the existing literature but also can be of special interest to the country’s policymakers. So, we urge that government needs to focus on promoting the energy efficient means of transportation to improve environmental quality with less adverse influence on economic growth.

Keywords

CO2 emission Transport energy consumption FDI Pakistan ARDL 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous referees as well as the Editor, Dr. Philippe Garrigues, for providing valuable comments and suggestions which substantially improved this article.

References

  1. Achour H, Belloumi M (2016) Investigating the causal relationship between transport infrastructure, transport energy consumption and economic growth in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:988–998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alshehry AS, Belloumi M (2017) Study of the environmental Kuznets curve for transport carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:1339–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amizadeh F, Alonso G, Benito A, Morales-Alonso G (2016) Analysis of the recent evolution of commercial air traffic CO2 emissions and fleet utilization in the six largest national markets of the European Union. J Air Transp Manag 55:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni V, Galmarini S (2012) European CO2 emission trends: a decomposition analysis for water and aviation transport sectors. Energy 45(1):595–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arvin MB, Pradhan RP, Norman NR (2015) Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries. Util Policy 35:50–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baek J (2016) Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecol Indic 66:352–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danish, Baloch MA (2017) Dynamic linkages between road transport energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental quality : evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1072-1
  9. Danish ZB, Wang B, Wang Z (2017a) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danish ZB, Wang Z, Wang B (2017b) Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: evidence from Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90(1):27–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3031-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan H, Hu M, Zhang Y, Wang J, Jiang W, Huang Q, Li J (2015) Quantification of carbon emissions of the transport service sector in China by using streamlined life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 95:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction : representation , estimation, and testing published by: the Econometric Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913236. Yet drift too far apart. Typically economic theory will propose forces which tend to. Econometrica 55(2):251–276.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  13. He LY, Qiu LY (2016) Transport demand, harmful emissions, environment and health co-benefits in China. Energy Policy 97:267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liddle B, Lung S (2013) The long-run causal relationship between transport energy consumption and GDP: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods robust to cross-sectional dependence. Econ Lett 121(3):524–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin B, Ahmad I (2016) Energy substitution effect on transport sector of Pakistan based on trans-log production function. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:1182–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin B, Xie C (2014) Reduction potential of CO2 emissions in China’s transport industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:689–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu C, Susilo YO, Karlström A (2016) Estimating changes in transport CO2 emissions due to changes in weather and climate in Sweden. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 49:172–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohmand YT, Wang A, Saeed A (2016) The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Transp Lett 7867(2):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1165463 Google Scholar
  19. Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pablo-Romero MP, Cruz L, Barata E (2017) Testing the transport energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the EU27 countries. Energy Econ 62:257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saboori B, Sapri M, bin Baba M (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)’s transport sector: a fully modified bi-directional relationship approach. Energy 66:150–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Ben JMM (2015) On the causal nexus of road transport CO2 emissions and macroeconomic variables in Tunisia: evidence from combined cointegration tests. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:89–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shahbaz M, Chaudhary AR, Ozturk I (2017) Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model. Energy 122:83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smidfelt Rosqvist L, Hiselius LW (2016) Online shopping habits and the potential for reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from passenger transport. J Clean Prod 131:163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sobrino N, Monzon A (2014) The impact of the economic crisis and policy actions on GHG emissions from road transport in Spain. Energy Policy 74:486–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Solís JC, Sheinbaum C (2013) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission trends in Mexican road transport. Energy Sustain Dev 17(3):280–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Subhra T, Nath T (2017) Transport infrastructure , economic development and urbanization in India ( 1990–2011): is there any causal relationship? Transp Res Part A 100:319–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.033 Google Scholar
  29. Talbi B (2017) CO2 emissions reduction in road transport sector in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:232–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Timilsina GR, Shrestha A (2009) Transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Asia: underlying factors and policy options. Energy Policy 37(11):4523–4539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNDP (2015) Pakistan sustainable transport (PAKSTRAN) project CIU-trucking Islamabad of CO2 emissions. Ideal Expert Serv. http://pakstran.pk/docs/reports/FinalReportCO2EmissionLCScenario(Rev-01)3.1.2A.pdf
  32. Xu B, Lin B (2015) Factors affecting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China’s transport sector: a dynamic nonparametric additive regression model. J Clean Prod 101:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu Z, Liu Y, Tian X, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2017) CO2 emissions from the industrialization and urbanization processes in the manufacturing center Tianjin in China. J Clean Prod 168:867–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations