Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 30, pp 23926–23938 | Cite as

Growth characteristics and nutrient removal capability of eco-ditch plants in mesocosm sediment receiving primary domestic wastewater

  • Mathieu Nsenga Kumwimba
  • Bo Zhu
  • Diana Kavidia Muyembe
  • Mawuli Dzakpasu
Research Article

Abstract

Eco-ditches are being explored to maximize their capability of capturing pollutants and mitigate any harmful side effects in rivers. In this study, mesocosm plastic drum sediment and field experiments were set up to screen 18 plant species found in ditches and identify those with potential for high biomass production and nutrients removal. Terrestrial plants grown in the mesocosm system were shown to be able to acclimate to aquatic conditions and to survive in primary domestic sewage. About 73–95% increase in plant biomass was recorded. Removal efficiencies for total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and ammonium-nitrogen from the sewage of 72–99%, 64–99%, and 75–100%, respectively, were recorded. Furthermore, complete removal of the applied nitrate-nitrogen load was achieved in mesocosm systems. Findings also show that all species, but especially Acorus calamus, Canna indica, Canna lily, Cyperus alternifolius, Colocasia gigantea, Eichhornia crassipes, Iris sibirica, and Typha latifolia had the highest efficiencies for nitrogen and phosphorous removal. The N and P mass balance analysis demonstrated that plant uptake and sediment N and P accumulation accounted for 41–86% and 18–49% of the total influent TN and TP loads, respectively. In addition, the amounts of nitrogen and phosphorous uptake by these plant species were influenced significantly by biomass. The field-culture experiment further identified Canna indica followed by Cyperus alternifolius as the most promising for high biomass production and nutrients uptake. Therefore, these plants may be recommended for extensive use in treating highly eutrophicated rivers. Outcomes of this work can be useful for model design specifications in eco-ditch mitigation of sewage pollution.

Keywords

Aquatic and terrestrial plants Biomass Non-point source pollutants Vegetated drainage channel Uptake Untreated sewage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41430750), the CAS Western Light Plan, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences—the Third World Academy of Sciences (CAS-TWAS) President’s Fellowship program for developing countries for financial support of this work.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_9992_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 11 kb)

References

  1. Belmont MA, Metcalfe CD (2003) Feasibility of using ornamental plants (Zantedeschia aethiopica) in subsurface flow treatment wetlands to remove nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants: a laboratory-scale study. Ecol Eng 21:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett ER, Moore MT, Cooper CM, Smith S, Shields FD, Drouillard KG (2005) Vegetated agricultural drainage ditches for the mitigation of pyrethroid-associated runoff. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2121–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch DF (2002) Reversing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters: challenges and opportunities for science. Estuaries 25:744–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouldin JL, Farris MT, Moore MT, Cooper CM (2004) Vegetative and structural characteristics of agricultural drainages in the Mississippi Delta landscapes. Environ Pollut 132:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd CE, Gross A, Rowan M (1998) Laboratory study of sedimentation for improving quality of pond effluents. J Appl Aquaculture 8:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman J, Hench K, Garbutt K, Sextone A, Bissonnette G, Skousen J (2001) Treatment of domestic wastewater by three wetland plant species in constructed wetlands. Water Air Soil Poll 128:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper CM, Moore MT, Bennett ER, Smith S, Farris JL, Milam CD (2004) Innovative uses of vegetated drainage ditches for reducing agricultural runoff. Water Sci Technol 49:117–123Google Scholar
  8. Devi R, Dahiya RP, Kumar A, Singh V (2007) Meeting energy requirement of wastewater treatment in rural sector. Energy Policy 35:3891–3897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diaz FJ, Ogeen AT, Dahlgren RA (2012) Agricultural pollutant removal by constructed wetlands: implications for water management and design. Agric Water Manag 104:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong HY, Qiang ZM, Wang WD, Jin H (2012) Evaluation of rural wastewater treatment processes in a county of eastern China. J Environ Monit 14:1906–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenway M, Woolley A (1999) Constructed wetlands in Queensland: performance efficiency and nutrient bioaccumulation. Ecol Eng 1:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heather LT, Matthew TM, Martin AL (2012) Influence of three aquatic macrophytes on mitigation of nitrogen species from agricultural runoff. Watter Air Soil Pollut 223:3227–3236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoagland CR, Gentry LE, David MB (2001) Plant nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation in a constructed wetland. J Freshw Ecol 16:527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu MH, Ao YS, Yang XE, Li TQ (2008) Treating eutrophic water for nutrient reduction using an aquatic macrophyte (Ipomoea aquatic Forsskal) in a deep flow technique system. Agric Water Manag 95:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayaweera GR, Mikkelsen DS (1991) Assessment of ammonia volatilization from flooded soil systems. In: Brady NC (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 45. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 303–356Google Scholar
  16. Jeanne D, Cécile D, Jean-Stéphane B, Philippe L, Marc V (2015) Managing ditches for agroecological engineering of landscape: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:999–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press,Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton 893 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Keizer-Vlek HE, Verdonschot PFM, Verdonschot RCM, Dekkers D (2014) The contribution of plant uptake to nutrient removal by floating treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 73:684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konnerup D, Thammarat Koottatep T, Brix H (2009) Treatment of domestic wastewater in tropical subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna and Heliconia. Ecol Eng 35:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovacic DA, David MB, Gentry LE, Starks KM, Cooke RA (2000) Effectiveness of constructed wetlands in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus export from agricultural tile drainage. J Environ Qual 29:1262–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kröger R, Holland MM, Moore MT, Cooper CM (2007) Hydrological variability and agricultural drainage ditch inorganic nitrogen reduction capacity. J Environ Qual 36:1646–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kröger R, Cooper CM, Moore MT (2008a) A preliminary study of an alternative controlled drainage strategy in surface drainage ditches: low-grade weirs. Agric Water Manag 95:678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kröger R, Holland MM, Moore MT (2008b) Agricultural drainage ditches mitigate phosphorus loads as a function of hydrological variability. J Environ Qual 37:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kröger R, Moore MT, Farris JL, Gopalan M (2011) Evidence for the use of low-grade weirs in drainage ditches to improve nutrient reductions from agriculture. Water Air Soil Poll 221:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Wang T, Muyembe DK (2016) Distribution and risk assessment of metals and arsenic contamination in man-made ditch sediments with different land use types. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24808–24823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Suanon F, Dzakpasu M, Muyembe DK (2017a) Long-term impact of primary domestic sewage on metal/loid accumulation in drainage ditch sediments, plants and water: implications for phytoremediation and restoration. Sci Total Environ 581 (582):773–781. doi: 10.1016/j.Scitotenv.2017.01.007
  27. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Zhixin D, Jialiang T, Wang T, Liwei X, Muyembe DK (2017b) Assessing nutrient, biomass, and sediment transport of drainage ditches in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. CLEAN Soil Air Water 45(1). doi: 10.1002/clen.201501012
  28. Kumwimba MN, Dzakpasu M, Zhu B, Wang T, Lunda I, Muyembe DK (2017c) Nutrient removal in a trapezoidal vegetated drainage ditch used to treat primary domestic sewage in a small catchment of the upper Yangtze River. Water  Environ J 31:72–79Google Scholar
  29. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Muyembe DK (2017d) Estimation of the removal efficiency of heavy metals and nutrients from ecological drainage ditches treating town sewage during dry and wet seasons. Environ Monit Assess 189(9):434Google Scholar
  30. Li B, Liao CZ, Zhang XD, Chen HL, Wang Q, Chen ZY, Gan XJ, Wu JH, Zhao B, Ma ZJ, Chen XL, Chen LF, Jiang JK (2009) Spartina alterniflora invasions in the Yangtze River estuary, China: an overview of current status and ecosystem effects. Ecol Eng 35:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li M, Sheng GP, Wu YJ, Yu ZL, Bañuelos GS, Yu HQ (2014) Enhancement of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from eutrophic water by economic plant annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) with ion implantation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:9617–9625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore MT, Rodgers JH, Cooper CM, Smith S Jr (2000) Constructed wetlands for mitigation of atrazine-associated agricultural runoff. Environ Pollut 110:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore MT, Bennett ER, Cooper CM, Smith S Jr, Farris JL, Drouillard KG, Schulz R (2006) Influence of vegetation in mitigation of methyl parathion runoff. Environ Pollut 142:288–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore MT, Kröger R, Locke MA, Cullum RF, Steinriede RW Jr, Testa S, Lizotte JRE, Bryant CT, Cooper CM (2010a) Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches. Environ Pollut 158:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore MT, Kröger R, Locke MA, Cullum RF, Steinriede RW Jr, Testa S (2010b) Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches. Environ Pollut 158:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Needelman BA, Kleinman PJA, Strock JS, Allen AL (2007) Improved management of agricultural drainage ditches for water quality protection: an overview. J Soil Water Conserv 62:171–178Google Scholar
  37. Newman JM, Clausen JC, Neafsey JA (2000) Seasonal performance of a wetland constructed to process dairy milkhouse wastewater in Connecticut. Ecol Eng 14:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rai UN, Tripathi RD, Singh NK, Upadhyay AK, Dwivedi S, Shukla MK, Mallick S, Singh SN, Nautiyal CS (2013) Constructed wetland as an ecotechnological tool for pollution treatment for conservation of Ganga river. Bioresour Technol 148:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson CJ, Craft CB (1993) Craft, effective phosphorus retention in wetlands: fact or fiction, in constructed wetlands for water quality improvement, Moshiri GA (ed), Chelsea, New York, p 271-282Google Scholar
  40. Scott JT, McCarthy MJ, Gardner WS, Doyle RD (2008) Denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, and nitrogen fixation along a nitrate concentration gradient in a created freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry 87:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith VH (2003) Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: a global problem. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart FM, Mulholland T, Cunninghamm AB, Kania BG, Osterlund MT (2008) Floating islands as an alternative to constructed wetlands for treatment of excess nutrients from agricultural and municipal wastes—results of laboratory-scale tests. Land Contam Reclam 16:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry, chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanner CC (1996) Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems—a comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake characteristics of eight emergent species. Ecol Eng 7:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tucker CS, Hargreaves JA (2003) Management of effluents from channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) embankment ponds in the southeastern United States. Aquaculture 226:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaillant N, Monnet F, Vernay P, Sallanon H, Coudret A, Hitmi A (2002) Urban wastewater treatment by a nutrient film technique system with a valuable commercial plant species (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium Trev.) Environ Sci Technol 36:2101–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vaillant N, Monnet F, Sallanon H, Coudret A, Hitmi A (2003) Treatment of domestic wastewater by an hydroponic NFT system. Chemosphere 50:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang L, Gan H, Wang F, Sun X, Zhu Q (2010) Characteristic analysis of plants for the removal of nutrients from a constructed wetland using reclaimed water. Clean- Soil Air Water 38:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu WZ, Liu Y, Zhu Q, Wei CJ, Wang JL (2009) Remediation of polluted river water by biological contact oxidation process using two types of carriers. Int J Environ Pollut 38:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu M, Tang XQ, Li QY, Yang WJ, Jin F, Tang MZ, Scholz M (2013) Review of ecological engineering solutions for rural non-point source water pollution control in Hubei province, China. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1561–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu X, Tan Y, Yang G, Li H (2011) Three Gorges Project: effects of resettlement on nutrient balance of the agroecosystems in the reservoir area. J Environ Plan Manage 54(4):517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu B, Wang ZH, Zhang XB (2012) Phosphorus fractions and release potential of ditch sediments from different land uses in a small catchment of the upper Yangtze River. J Soils Sediments 12:278–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zou J, Guo X, Han Y, Liu J, Liang H (2012) Study of a novel vertical flow constructed wetland system with drop aeration for rural wastewater treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Nsenga Kumwimba
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bo Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Diana Kavidia Muyembe
    • 5
  • Mawuli Dzakpasu
    • 6
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological RegulationChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LubumbashiLubumbashiDemocratic Republic of Congo
  5. 5.School of Life Science and EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources, Environment and Ecology, School of Environmental and Municipal EngineeringXi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations