Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 30, pp 23571–23577 | Cite as

Effects of golpar (Heracleum persicum Desf.) and probiotics in drinking water on performance, carcass characteristics, organ weights, blood plasma constituents, and immunity of broilers

  • Ali Jamshidparvar
  • Faramin Javandel
  • Alireza Seidavi
  • Francisco Peña Blanco
  • Andrés L. Martínez Marín
  • Carmen Avilés Ramírez
  • Estrella Agüera Buendía
  • Nieves Núñez-Sánchez
Research Article
  • 291 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing levels of Heracleum persicum (golpar) in drinking water were studied in broilers. Two hundred and forty-one-day-old male chickens were allocated to one of six treatments: control, without added phytogenics nor probiotics in drinking water, and probiotics at recommended manufacturer’s level (P) or 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 ml/l of golpar extract solution (G1, G1.5, G2, and G2.5 treatments, respectively) in drinking water. As a result of this study, no linear or quadratic trends in the feed intake (FI) and feed conversion rate (FCR) due to golpar supplementation were found. Body weight gain, final body weight, and relative carcass weight showed a positive linear response with increasing levels of golpar supplementation. Neither golpar nor probiotics had effects on the percentages of edible parts of the carcass. Golpar supplementation levels caused a linear negative response of the albumin content in blood plasma, whereas both abdominal fat as percentage of carcass weight and uric acid levels in blood plasma linearly increased. The effects on Ig responses were only observed at 42 days of age and were similar in probiotics and the highest level of golpar supplementation. Based on our results, both probiotics and golpar supplementation could improve broiler performance and immune function.

Keywords

Golpar Heracleum Performance Phytogenics Poultry Probiotics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support by Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, grant number 4.5830, is gratefully acknowledged. The Animal Production Department of the University of Cordoba is also fully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abou-Elkhair R, Ahmed HA, Selim S (2014) Effects of black pepper (Piper nigrum), turmeric powder (Curcuma longa) and coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum) and their combinations as feed additives on growth performance, carcass traits, some blood parameters and humoral immune response of broiler chickens. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 27:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afrisham R, Aberomand M, Ghaffari MA, Siahpoosh A, Jamalan M (2015) Inhibitory effect of Heracleum persicum and Ziziphus jujuba on activity of alpha-amylase. J Botany 824683.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/824683
  3. Alçiçek A, Bozkurt M, Abuk M (2004) The effect of a mixture of herbal essential oils, an organic acid or a probiotic on broiler performance. S Afr J Anim Sci 34:217–222Google Scholar
  4. Asgarpanah J, Mehrabani GD, Ahmadi M, Ranjbar R, Ardebily MSA (2012) Chemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties of Heracleum persicum Desf Ex Fischer: A review. J Med Plants Res 6:1813–1820Google Scholar
  5. Ashayerizadeh O, Dastar B, Shargh MS, Ashayerizadeh A, Mamooee M (2009) Influence of antibiotic, prebiotic and probiotic supplementation to diets on carcass characteristics, hematological indices and internal organ size of young broiler chickens. J Anim Vet Adv 8:1772–1776Google Scholar
  6. Aviagen (2012) Ross broiler nutrition specifications. Aviagen, Alabama Available at: http://es.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross308BroilerNutritionSpecs2014-EN.pdf Google Scholar
  7. Ayasan T (2016) Efficacy of probiotic supplementation on growth performance and carcass traits in Japanese quails (Coturnixcoturnix Japonica). Indian J Anim Sci 86:795–798Google Scholar
  8. Ayasan T, Ozcan BD, Baylan M, Canogullari S (2006) The effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic protexin on egg yield parameters of Japanese quails (Coturnixcoturnix Japonica). Int J Poult Sci 5:776–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahadori MB, Dinparast L, Zengin G (2016) The genus Heracleum: a comprehensive review on its phytochemistry, pharmacology, and ethnobotanical values as a useful herb. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15:1018–1039Google Scholar
  10. Blajman JE, Frizzo LS, Zbrun MV, Astesana DM, Fusari ML, Soto LP, Rosmini MR, Signorini ML (2014) Probiotics and broiler growth performance: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Brit Poultry Sci 55:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bozkurt M, Küçükyılmaz K, Çatlı AU, Çınar M (2009) The effect of single or combined dietary supplementation of prebiotics, organic acid and probiotics on performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers. S Afr J Anim Sci 39:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bravo D, Pirgozliev V, Rose SP (2014) A mixture of carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and capsicum oleoresin improves energy utilization and growth performance of broiler chickens fed maize-based diet. J Anim Sci 92:1531–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christaki E, Bonos E, Giannenas I, Florou-Paneri P (2012) Aromatic plants as a source of bioactive compounds. Agriculture 2:228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckert NH, Lee JT, Hyatt D, Stevens SM, Anderson S, Anderson PN, Beltran R, Schatzmayr G, Mohnl M, Caldwell DJ (2010) Influence of probiotic administration by feed or water on growth parameters of broilers reared on medicated and nonmedicated diets. J Appl Poult Res 19:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO/WHO (2001) Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Córdoba, Argentina: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/probio_report_en.pdf
  16. Fathi R, Samadi MS, Qotbi AA, Seidavi A, Martínez-Marín AL (2016) Effects of feed supplementation with increasing levels of organic acids on growth performance, carcass traits, gut microbiota and pH, plasma metabolites, and immune response of broilers. Anim Sci Pap Rep 34:195–206Google Scholar
  17. Franciosini MP, Casagrande-Proietti P, Forte C, Beghelli D, Acuti G, Zanichelli D, dal Bosco A, Castellini C, Trabalza-Marinucci M (2016) Effects of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) aqueous extracts on broiler performance, immune function and intestinal microbial population. J Appl Anim Res 44:474–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghasemi HA, Kasani N, Taherpour K (2014) Effects of black cumin seed (Nigella sativa L.), a probiotic, a prebiotic and a synbiotic on growth performance, immune response and blood characteristics of male broilers. Livest Sci 164:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Sanei B, Parvizi P, Gisavi H, Chambers JR, Sharif S (2005) Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin Diagn Lab Immun 12:1387–1392Google Scholar
  20. Huyghebaert G, Ducatelle R, Immerseel FV (2011) An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet J 187:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jadhav K, Sharma KS, Katoch S, Sharma VK, Mane BG (2015) Probiotics in broiler poultry feeds: a review. J Anim Nutr Physiol 1:04–16Google Scholar
  22. Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S, Ho YW (2003) Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. Brit Poultry Sci 44:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karimi-Torshizi MA, Moghaddam AR, Rahimi S, Mojgani N (2010) Assessing the effect of administering probiotics in water or as a feed supplement on broiler performance and immune response. Brit Poultry Sci 51:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khattak F, Ronchi A, Castelli P, Sparks N (2014) Effects of natural blend of essential oil on growth performance, blood biochemistry, cecal morphology, and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 93:132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kheiri F, Rahimian Y, Rafiee A (2014) Effect of Heracleum persicum extract on performance and some haematological parameters in broiler chicks. Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 4:522–525Google Scholar
  26. Lee KW, Kim JS, Oh ST, Kang CW, An BK (2015) Effects of dietary sanguinarine on growth performance, relative organ weight, cecal microflora, serum cholesterol level and meat quality in broiler chickens. J Poultry Sci 52:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Machin M, Simoyi MF, Blemings KP, Klandorf H (2004) Increased dietary protein elevates plasma uric acid and is associated with decreased oxidative stress in rapidly-growing broilers. Comp Biochem Phys B 137:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murugesan GR, Syed B, Haldar S, Pender C (2015) Phytogenic feed additives as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in broiler chickens. Front Vet Sci 2:21.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00021 Google Scholar
  29. Naeini A, Shokri H, Khosravi AR (2013) Immunostimulatory effects of aqueous extract of Heracleum persicum Desf. on mouse peritoneal macrophages. Jundishapur J Microbiol 6:1–6Google Scholar
  30. Nayebpor M, Farhomand P, Hashemi A (2007) Effects of different levels of direct fed microbial (Primalac) on growth performance and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. J Anim Vet Adv 6:1308–1311Google Scholar
  31. Norouzi B, Qotbi AAA, Seidavi A, Schiavone A, Martínez-Marín AL (2015) Effect of different dietary levels of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and yarrow (Achillea millefolium) on the growth performance, carcass traits and ileal microbiota of broilers. Ital J Anim Sci 14:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olukosi OA, Dono ND (2014) Modification of digesta pH and intestinal morphology with the use of benzoic acid or phytobiotics and the effects on broiler chicken growth performance and energy and nutrient utilization. J Anim Sci 92:3945–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perić L, Milošević N, Žikić D, Bjedov S, Cvetković D, Markov S, Mohnl M, Steiner T (2010) Effects of probiotic and phytogenic products on performance, gut morphology and cecal microflora of broiler chickens. Arch Tierzucht 53:350–359Google Scholar
  34. Petrovic V, Marcincak S, Popelka P, Simkova J, Martonova M, Buleca J, Kovac G (2012) The effect of supplementation of clove and agrimony or clove and lemon balm on growth performance, antioxidant status and selected indices of lipid profile of broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 96:970–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pirgozliev V, Bravo D, Rose SP (2014) Rearing conditions influence nutrient availability of plant extracts supplemented diets when fed to broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 98:667–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pourakbari M, Seidavi A, Asadpour L, Martínez A (2016) Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers. An Acad Bras Ciênc 88:1011–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pourhossein Z, Qotbi AAA, Seidavi A, Laudadio V, Centoducati G, Tufarelli V (2014) Effect of different levels of dietary sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel extract on humoral immune system responses in broiler chickens. Anim Sci J 86:105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SAS (2016) SAS version 3.5 University Edition. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27513–2414, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Seal BS, Lillehoj HS, Donovan DM, Gay CG (2013) Alternatives to antibiotics: a symposium on the challenges and solutions for animal production. Anim Health Res Rev 14:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharififar F, Pournourmohammadi S, Rastegarianzadeh R, Ranjbaran O, Purhemmaty A (2009) Immunomodulatory activity of aqueous extract of Heracleum persicum Desf. in mice. Iran J Pharm Res 8:287–292Google Scholar
  41. Talebi A, Amirzadeh B, Mokhtari B, Gahri H (2008) Effects of a multi-strain probiotic (PrimaLac) on performance and antibody responses to Newcastle disease virus and infectious bursal disease virus vaccination in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol 37:509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toghyani M, Toghyani M, Gheisari A, Ghalamkari G, Eghbalsaied S (2011) Evaluation of cinnamon and garlic as antibiotic growth promoter substitutions on performance, immune responses, serum biochemical and haematological parameters in broiler chicks. Livest Sci 138:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeng Z, Zhang S, Wang H, Piao X (2015) Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 6:7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0004-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Rasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityRashtIran
  2. 2.Departamento de Producción AnimalUniversidad de Córdoba, Campus Universitario de RabanalesCórdobaSpain

Personalised recommendations