Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental risk assessment of blight-resistant potato: use of a crop model to quantify nitrogen cycling at scales of the field and cropping system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment of GM crops in Europe proceeds by step-wise estimation of effect, first in the plant, then the field plot (e.g. 10–100 m−2), field (1000–10,000 m−2) and lastly in the environment in which the crop would be grown (100–10,000 km2). Processes that operate at large scales, such as cycling of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), are difficult to predict from plot scales. Here, a procedure is illustrated in which plot scale data on yield (offtake) and N inputs for blight resistant (both GM and non-GM) and blight-susceptible potato are upscaled by a model of crop resource use to give a set of indicators and metrics defining N uptake and release in realistic crop sequences. The greatest potential damage to environment is due to loss of N from the field after potato harvest, mainly because of the large quantity of mineral and plant matter, high in N, that may die or be left in the field. Blight infection intensifies this loss, since less fertiliser N is taken up by plants and more (as a proportion of plant mass) is returned to the soil. In a simulation based on actual crop sequences, N returns at harvest of potato were raised from 100 kg ha−1 in resistant to 150 kg ha−1 in susceptible varieties subject to a 40% yield loss. Based on estimates that blight-resistant types would require ~20% of the fungicide applied to susceptible types, introduction of resistant types into a realistic 6-year cropping sequence would reduce overall fungicide use to between 72 and 54% depending on the inputs to other crops in the sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arpaia S, Messéan A, Birch NA, Hokannen H, Härtel S, van Loon L, Lovei G, Park J, Spreafico H, Squire GR, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tebbe C, van der Voet H (2014) Assessing and monitoring impacts of genetically modified plants on agro-ecosystems: the approach of AMIGA project. Entomologia 2014:2 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/entomologia.2014.154

  • Beaumont A (1947) The dependence on the weather of the dates of outbreak of potato late blight epidemics. Trans Br Mycol Soc 31:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch ANE, Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J, Heckmann LH, Krogh PH, Cortet J (2007) The role of laboratory, glasshouse and field scale experiments in understanding the interactions between genetically modified crops and soil ecosystems: a review of the ECOGEN project. Pedobiologia 51:251–260. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.04.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch ANE, Begg GS, Squire GR (2011) How agro-ecological research helps to address food security issues under new IPM and pesticide reduction policies for global crop production systems. J Exp Bot 62:3251–3261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2009) EC regulation no 1107/2009. Concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC

  • Cooke DEL, Cano LM, Raffaele S et al (2012) Genome analyses of an aggressive and invasive lineage of the Irish potato famine pathogen. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2007) Maximum nitrogen (Nmax) limits, and exemptions from the closed spreading period for manufactured nitrogen fertilisers. ADAS Report to Defra – supporting paper for the consultation on implementation of the Nitrates Directive in England. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2010) Fertiliser manual (RB209), 8th edn. Defra/The Stationary Office, London http://www.ahdb.org.uk/documents/rb209-fertiliser-manual-110412.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Devienne-Barret F, Justes E, Machet JM, Mary B (2000) Integrated control of nitrate uptake by crop growth rate and soil nitrate availability under field conditions. Ann Bot 86:955–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertiliser Practice (2016) The British survey of fertiliser practice: fertiliser use on farm crops for the year 2015. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2010 8(11):1879. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SJ, Park T-H, Pel M et al (2009) Rpi-vnt1.1, a Tm-22 homolog from Solanum venturii confers resistance to potato late blight. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:589–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry WE (2008) Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer. Mol Plant Pathol 9:385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt C, Valkonen JPT (2001) Organisation of genes controlling disease resistance in potato. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:79–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Neeteson JJ, Draycott A (1986) Quantitative relationships for the dependence of growth rate of arable crops on their nitrogen content, dry weight and aerial environment. Plant Soil 91:281–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Draycott A (1995) Modelling uptake of nitrogen, phosphate and potassium in relation to crop growth. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen pers, Wageningen, pp 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC et al (2009) Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 461:393–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haesaert G, Vossen JH, Custers R et al (2015) Transformation of the potato variety Desiree with single or multiple resistance genes increases resistance to late blight under field conditions. Crop Prot 77:163–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, Boonekamp PM, Hutten R et al (2008) Societal costs of late blight in potato and prospects of durable resistance through cisgenic modification. Potato Res 51:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, Boonekamp PM, Hutten R et al (2016) Durable late blight resistance in potato through dynamic varieties obtained by cisgenesis: scientific and societal advances in the DuRPh project. Potato Res:1–32

  • Hawes C, Squire GR, Hallett PD, Watson C, Young M (2010) Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J, Hawes C, Squire GR, Hilton A, Wale S, Smith P (2009) The carbon footprints of food crop production. Int J Agric Sustain 7:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen E, Schouten H (2008) Cisgenesis, a new tool for traditional plant breeding, should be exempted from the regulation on genetically modified organisms in a step by step approach. Potato Res 51:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RA, Heilbron TD (1995) Simulating effects of water-stress on growth and yield of potato. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen pers, Wageningen, pp 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RA, MacKerron DKL (1989) Radiation interception and growth in irrigated and droughted potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Field Crop Res 22:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JDG, Witek K, Verweij W et al (2014) Elevating crop disease resistance with cloned genes. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130087. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, van Keulen H (1995) Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen pers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron DKL (1985) A simple model of potato growth and yield. Part II. Validation and external sensitivity. Agric For Meteorol 34:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron DKL, Waister PD (1985) A simple model of potato growth and yield. Part I. Model development and sensitivity analysis. Agric For Meteorol 34:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron DKL, Young MW, Davies HV (1993) A method to optimize N-application in relation to soil supply of N, and yield of potato. Plant Soil 155:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall B, van den Broek B (1995) Field experiments and analysis of data used in the case study. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen pers, Wageningen, pp 179–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall B, Squire GR, Terry AC (1992) Effect of temperature on interception and conversion of solar radiation by stands of groundnut. J Exp Bot 43:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messean A, Squire G, Perry J, Angevin F, Gomez M, Townend P, Sausse C, Breckling B, Langrell S, Dzeroski S, Sweet J (2009) Sustainable introduction of GM crops into european agriculture: a summary report of the FP6 SIGMEA research project. OCL 16:37–51. doi:10.1684/ocl.2009.0241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard P, Marshall B (1986) Growth, nitrogen uptake and partitioning within the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop, in relation to application. J Agric Sci 107:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monie C, Reay G, Wardlaw J (2014) Pesticide usage in Scotland. Arable crops and potato stores 2014, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA), Edinburgh (and comparable volumes for 2012 and 2010)

  • Ortiz V, Phelan S, Mullins E (2016) A temporal assessment of nematode community structure and diversity in a rhizosphere of cisgenic Phytophthora infestans-resistant potatoes. BMC Ecol 16:55. doi:10.1186/s12898-016-0109-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pel MA, Foster SJ, Park T-H et al (2009) Mapping and cloning of late blight resistance genes from Solanum venturii using an interspecific candidate gene approach. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:601–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt HW, Tai G (1998) Relationship between resistance to late blight in potato foliage and tubers of cultivars and breeding selections with different resistance levels. Am Journal Potato Res 75:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietman H, Bijsterbosch G, Cano LM et al (2012) Qualitative and quantitative late blight resistance in the potato cultivar Sarpo Mira is determined by the perception of five distinct RXLR effectors. Mol Plant Microbe Ineract 25:910–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald J, Trognitz B (2013) Solanum resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans and their corresponding avirulence genes. Mol Plant Pathol 14:740–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Lemaire G (2014) Quantifying crop nitrogen status for comparisons of agronomic practices and genotypes. Field Crop Res 164:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire GR (1995) Linkages between plant and weather in models of crop production. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil-plant-atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen, Wageningen pers, pp 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire GR, Hawes C, Valentine TA, Young MW (2015) Degradation rate of soil function depends on trajectory of agricultural intensification. Agric Ecosyst Environ 202:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire GR, Lecomte J, Husken A, Soukup J, Messean A (2013) Contributions of pollen and seed to impurity in crops—a comparison of maize, oilseed rape and beet. In: Bertheu Y (ed) Genetically modified and non-genetically modified food supply chains: co-existence and traceability Blackwell, pp. 23-34

  • Sylvester-Bradley R, Kindred DR (2009) Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. J Exp Bot 60:1939–1951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vleeshouwers VGA, Raffaele S, Vossen JH et al (2011) Understanding and exploiting late blight resistance in the age of effectors. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:507–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is publication No. 27 produced within the framework of the project Assessing and Monitoring the Impacts of Genetically Modified Plants on Agro-ecosystems (AMIGA), funded by the European Commission in Framework Programme 7, Theme KBBE.2011.3.5-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey R. Squire.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 248 kb).

ESM 2

(XLSX 559 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, M.W., Mullins, E. & Squire, G.R. Environmental risk assessment of blight-resistant potato: use of a crop model to quantify nitrogen cycling at scales of the field and cropping system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 21434–21444 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9769-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9769-8

Keywords

Navigation