Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 25, pp 20372–20389 | Cite as

Elemental mobility in sulfidic mine tailings reclaimed with paper mill by-products as sealing materials

  • Yu JiaEmail author
  • Nanna Stahre
  • Maria Mäkitalo
  • Christian Maurice
  • Björn Öhlander
Research Article

Abstract

Sealing layers made of two alkaline paper mill by-products, fly ash and green liquor dregs, were placed on top of 50-year-old sulfide-containing tailings as a full-scale remediation approach. The performance and effectiveness of the sealing layers with high water content for an oxygen barrier and low hydraulic conductivity for a sealing layer in preventing the formation of acid rock drainage were evaluated 5 years after the remediation. The leaching behavior of the covered tailings was studied using batch leaching tests (L/S ratio 10 L/kg). The leaching results revealed that, in general, the dregs- and ash-covered tailings released relatively lower concentrations of many elements contained in acid rock drainage compared to those from the uncovered tailings. A change in the chemical composition and mineralogical state of the tailings was observed for the tailings beneath the covers. The increase in pH caused by the alkaline materials promoted metal precipitation. Geochemical modeling using PHREEQC confirmed most of the geochemical changes of the covered tailings. Both the ash and dregs showed potential to function as sealing materials in terms of their geochemical properties. However, mobilization of Zn and Ni from the lower part of the dregs-covered tailings was observed. The same phenomenon was observed for the lower part of the ash-covered tailings. Ash showed advantages over dregs as a cover material; based on geochemical studies, the ash immobilized more elements than the dregs did. Lysimeters were installed below the sealing layers, and infiltrating water chemistry and hydrology were studied to monitor the amount and quality of the leachate percolating through.

Keywords

Acid rock drainage Fly ash Green liquor dregs Lysimeter Sealing layer Tailings remediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Swedish Research Council for the Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS ID 2011-268-19774-35); the European Union Structural Funds; the Northern Sweden Soil Remediation Center, EDF Objective 2 (Contract MCN IO No 43173); the Sveriges Ingenjör Environmental Fund; and the Center of Advanced Mining and Metallurgy (CAMM) for financial support. The personnel at Rönnskärsverken are acknowledged for the assistance during the field work. Dr. Jinmei Lu is thanked for the sampling assistance.

References

  1. Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. Review article. J Clean Prod 14:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison JD, Brown DS, Novo-Gradac KJ (1991) MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, a geochemical assessment model for environmental systems. Version 3.0 user’s manual, environmental research laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/3-911021, Athens, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubertin M, Bussière B, Pabst T, James M, Mbonimpa M (2016) Review of reclamation techniques for acid generating mine wastes upon closure of disposal sites. Proc. Geo-Chicago: Sustainability, Energy and the Geoenvironment, Chicago, Aug 14–18Google Scholar
  4. Awoh AS, Mbonimpa M, Bussière B (2013) Field study of the chemical and physical stability of highly sulphide-rich tailings stored under a shallow water cover. Mine Water Environ 32:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellaloui A, Chtaini A, Ballivy G, Narasiah S (1999) Laboratory investigation of the control of acid mine drainage using alkaline paper mill waste. Water Air Soil Pollut 111:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benson CH, Trast JM (1995) Hydraulic conductivity of thirteen compacted clays. Clay Clay Miner 43:669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookins DG (2008) Eh-pH diagrams for geochemistry. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsson E, Öhlander B, Holmström H (2003) Geochemistry of the infiltrating water in the vadose zone of a remediated tailings impoundment, Kristineberg mine, northern Sweden. Appl Geochem 18:659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dold B (2003) Basic concepts of environmental geochemistry of sulfide mine-waste. In: Geochemistry and geomicrobiology of mine water formation. 27–29 June, Lisbon, 1–36. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228885471_Basic_concepts_of_environmental_geochemistry_of_sulfide_mine-waste. Accessed 9 June 2016
  10. European Council Decision (2003) Council decision of 19 December 2002 establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to article 16 of and annex II to directive 1999/31/EC. Off J Eur Communities L11:27–49Google Scholar
  11. Gray NF (1997) Environmental impact and remediation of acid mine drainage: a management problem. Environ Geol 30:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo Q, Blowes DW (2009) Biogeochemistry of two types of permeable reactive barrier, organic carbon and iron-bearing organic carbon for mine drainage treatment: column experiments. J Contam Hydrol 107(3–4):128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heikkinen PM, Räisänen ML (2008) Mineralogical and geochemical alteration of Hitura sulphide mine tailings with emphasis on nickel mobility and retention. J Geochem Explor 97:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermsmeyer D, van der Ploeg RR, Horton R, Bachmann J (2002) Lysimeter study of water and salt dynamics in a saline metallurgical waste. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiller E, Petrá M, Tóth R, Lalinská-Voleková B, Jurkovič L, Kučerová G, Radková A, Šottník P, Vozár J (2013) Geochemical and mineralogical characterization of a neutral, low-sulfide/high-carbonate tailings impoundment, Markušovce, eastern Slovakia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7627–7642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Höglund LO, Herbert RB, Lövgren L, Öhlander B, Neretnieks I, Moreno L, Malmström M, Elander P, Linvall M, Lindström B (2004) MiMi−Performance assessment: Main report. MiMi Report 2003:3. In: Höglund LO, Herbert RB (ed) MiMi Print. Luleå, Stockholm. ISBN: 91–89350–27–8Google Scholar
  17. Holmström H, Salmon UJ, Carlsson E, Petrov P, Öhlander B (2001) Geochemical investigations of sulfide-bearing tailings at Kristineberg, northern Sweden, a few years after remediation. Sci Total Environ 273:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingri J, Widerlund A, Land M (2005) Geochemistry of major elements in a pristine boreal river system; hydrological compartments and flow paths. Aquat Geochem 11:57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jia Y, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2014) Effect of the alkaline industrial residues fly ash, green liquor dregs, and lime mud on mine tailings oxidation when used as covering material. Environ Earth Sci 72:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jia Y, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2015) Metal mobilization in tailings covered with alkaline residue products: results from a leaching test using fly ash, green liquor dregs and lime mud. Mine Water Environ 34:270–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keefer RF, Sajwan KS (1993) Trace elements in coal and coal combustion residues. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  23. Lapakko K (2002) Metal mine rock and waste characterization tools: an overview, International Institute for Environment and Development. MMSD 67Google Scholar
  24. Lindgren M (2005) Efterbehandling av anrikningssanden på Rönnskär, plan för provytya. Project report. Boliden Mineral AB, Skellefteå, Sweden (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  25. Lindsay MBJ, Condon PD, Jambor JL, Lear KG, Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ (2009) Mineralogical, geochemical, and microbial investigation of a sulfide-rich tailings deposit characterized by neutral drainage. Appl Geochem 24:2212–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ljungberg J, Öhlander B (2001) The geochemical dynamics of oxidizing mine tailings at Laver, northern Sweden. J Geochem Explor 74:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lottermoser BG (2010) Mine wastes: characterization, treatment, and environmental impacts, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu J, Alakangas L, Jia Y, Gotthardsson J (2013) Evaluation of the application of dry covers over carbonate-rich sulphide tailings. J Hazard Mater 244–245:180-194Google Scholar
  29. Mäkitalo M (2015) Green liquor dregs in sealing layers to prevent the formation of acid mine drainage: from characterization to implementation. Doctoral Thesis. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. ISSN 1402-1544Google Scholar
  30. Mäkitalo M, Lu J, Stahre N, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2012) Assessment of the effect of aging on green liquor dregs cover for tailings deposits: field investigation. In: proceedings of the 8th WASCON 2012—towards effective, durable and sustainable production and use of alternative materials in construction. 8th International conference on sustainable management of waste and recycled materials in construction, Gothenburg, pp 1–5, 30 May–1 June 2012Google Scholar
  31. Mäkitalo M, Maurice C, Jia Y, Öhlander B (2014) Characterization of green liquor dregs, potentially useful for prevention of the formation of acid rock drainage. Minerals 4:330–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mäkitalo M, Stenman D, Ikumapayi F, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2016a) An evaluation of using various admixtures of green liquor dregs, a residual product, as sealing layer on reactive mine tailings. Mine Water Environ 35:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mäkitalo M, Lu J, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2016b) Prediction of the long-term performance of green liquor dregs as a sealing layer to prevent the formation of acid mine drainage. J Environ Chem Eng 4:2121–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martins FM, Martins JM, Ferracin LC, da Cunha CJ (2007) Mineral phases of green liquor dregs, slaker grits, lime mud and wood ash of a Kraft pulp and paper mill. J Hazard Mater 147:610–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mylona E, Xenidis A, Csövári M, Németh G (2007) Application of dry covers for the closure of tailings facilities. Land Contam Reclamat 15:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nurmesniemi H, Pöykiö R, Peramaki P, Kuokkanen T (2005) The use of a sequential leaching procedure for heavy metal fractionation in green liquor dregs from a causticizing process at a pulp mill. Chemosphere 61:1475–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pabst T, Aubertin M, Bussière B, Molson J (2014) Column tests to characterize the hydrogeochemical response of pre-oxidized acid-generating tailings with a monolayer cover. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pabst T, Molson J, Aubertin M, Bussière B (2017) Reactive transport modelling of the hydro-geochemical behaviour of partially oxidized acid-generating mine tailings with a monolayer cover. Appl Geochem 78:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pachana K, Zuddas P, Censi P (2012) Influence of pH and temperature on the early stage of mica alteration. Appl Geochem 27:1738–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2011) PHREEQC-2 (version 2.18). A hydrochemical transport model. http://www.brr.cr.usgs.gov
  41. Pérez-López R, Nieto JM, de Almodóvar GR (2007) Immobilization of toxic elements in mine residues derived from mining activities in the Iberian Pyrite Blet. Appl Geochem 22:1919–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pérez-López R, Quispe D, Castillo J, Nieto JM (2011) Acid neutralization by dissolution of alkaline paper mill wastes and implications for treatment of sulfide-mine drainage. Am Mineral 96:781–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qureshi AS, Jia Y, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2016) Potential of fly ash for neutralization of acid mine drainage. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:17083–17094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ragnvaldsson D, Bergknut M, Lewis J, Drotz S, Lundkvist A, Abrahamsson K, Fernerud S (2014) A novel method for reducing acid mine drainage using green liquor dregs. Environ Chem Lett 12:443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sahoo PK, Kim K, Equeenuddin SM, Powell MA (2013) Current approaches for mitigating acid mine drainage. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 226:1–32Google Scholar
  46. SIS (2003) Swedish Standards Institute. SS-EN 12457–4 Characterisation of waste—leaching—compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges, Part 4: one stage batch test at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 L/kg for materials with particle size below 10 mm (without or with size reduction)Google Scholar
  47. Sivapullaiah PV, Sridharan A, Stalin V (2000) Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite-sand mixtures. Can Geotech J 37:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soares AB, Ubaldo MO, de Souza VP, Soares PSM, Barbosa MC, Mendonca RMG (2009) Design of a dry cover pilot test for acid mine drainage abatement in southern Brazil. I: materials characterization and numerical modeling. Mine Water Environ 28:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stahre N (2012) Grönlutslam och flygaska som tätskiktsmaterial för sluttäckning av sulfidhaltig anrikningssand – Utvärdering efter 5 års användning. MSc. Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå (In Swedish with abstract in English). http://pure.ltu.se/portal/files/40148687/LTU-EX-2012-40039243.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2016
  50. US EPA (1991) Methods for the determination of metals in environmental samples. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC EPA/600/4–91/010Google Scholar
  51. Weber PA, Hughes JB, Conner LB, Lindsay P, Smart R (2006) Short-term acid rock drainage characteristics determined by paste pH and kinetic NAG testing: cypress, Prospect, New Zealand. In proceeding of the 7th International conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), ASMR, 2289-2310, United States, (R Barnhisel Eds)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Jia
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nanna Stahre
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maria Mäkitalo
    • 1
  • Christian Maurice
    • 1
    • 4
  • Björn Öhlander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources EngineeringLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Environment and Mineral ResourcesGreenland Institute of Natural ResourcesNuukGreenland
  3. 3.School of Science and TechnologyÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  4. 4.Ramböll Sverige ABLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations