Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 23, pp 19313–19321 | Cite as

Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings

  • Markus SillanpääEmail author
  • Pirjo Sainio
Research Article

Abstract

Microplastics are widely spread in the environment, which along with still increasing production have aroused concern of their impacts on environmental health. The objective of this study is to quantify the number and mass of two most common textile fibers discharged from sequential machine washings to sewers. The number and mass of microfibers released from polyester and cotton textiles in the first wash varied in the range 2.1 × 105 to 1.3 × 107 and 0.12 to 0.33% w/w, respectively. Amounts of released microfibers showed a decreasing trend in sequential washes. The annual emission of polyester and cotton microfibers from household washing machines was estimated to be 154,000 (1.0 × 1014) and 411,000 kg (4.9 × 1014) in Finland (population 5.5 × 106). Due to the high emission values and sorption capacities, the polyester and cotton microfibers may play an important role in the transport and fate of chemical pollutants in the aquatic environment.

Keywords

Microplastic Polyester Cotton Washing machine Household Emission 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ms. Minna Sepponen (Finnish Environment Institute) is acknowledged for her technical help during the experiments and Mr. Timo Vänni for the photographs (Figs. 1 and 5). Lic.Sc. Kristiina Aalto (University of Helsinki) is thanked for the advices and input data in the estimate of annual fiber emission. This work was supported by Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry.

References

  1. Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browne MA (2015) What comes out in the wash. The New Your Times 29(11):2015Google Scholar
  3. Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC (2013) Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr Biol 23:2388–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmichael A (2015) Man-made fibers continue to grow. Textile World 165:2588–2597Google Scholar
  5. Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG (2016) Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 91:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collard F, Gilbert B, Eppe G, Parmentier E, Das K (2015) Detection of anthropogenic particles in fish stomachs: an isolation method adapted to identification by Raman spectroscopy. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 69:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubais F, Liebezeit G (2013) Suspended microplastics and black carbon particles in the Jade system, southern North Sea. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1352. doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1352-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dümichen E, Barthel A-K, Braun U, Bannick CG, Brand K, Jekel M, Senz R (2015) Analysis of polyethylene microplastics in environmental samples, using a thermal decomposition method. Water Res 85:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eerkes-Medrano D, Thompson RC, Aldridge DC (2015) Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res 75:63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen M, Mason S, Wison S, Box C, Zellers A, Edwards W, Farley H, Amato S (2013) Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Mar Pollut Bull 77:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fendall LS, Sewell MA (2009) Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleaners. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1225–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grancaric AM, Tarbuk A, Pusic (2005) Electrokinetic properties of textile fabrics. Color Technol 121:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartline NL, Bruce NJ, Karba SN, Ruff EO, Sonar SU, Holden PA (2016) Microfiber masses recovered from conventional machine washing of new and aged garments. Environ Sci Technol 50:11532–11538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M (2012) Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol 46:3060–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Imhof HK, Ivleva NP, Schmid J, Niessner R, Laforsch C (2013) Contamination of beach sediments of a subalpine lake with microplastic particles. Curr Biol 23:R867–R868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. JRC – Joint Research Centre (2013): Guidance on monitoring of marine litter in European seas—a guidance document within the Common Implementation Strategy for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. MSFD Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter European UnionGoogle Scholar
  17. Koelmans AA, Bakir A, Burton GA, Janssen CR (2016) Microplastic as a vector for chemicals in the aquatic environment: critical review and model-supported reinterpretation of empirical studies. Environ Sci Technol 50:3315–3326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ladewig SM, Bao S, Chow AT (2015) Natural fibers: a missing link to chemical pollution dispersion in aquatic environments. Environ Sci Technol 49:12609–12610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee H, Shim WJ, Kwon J-H (2014) Sorption capacity of plastic debris for hydrophobic organic chemicals. Sci Total Environ 470-471:1545–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li L, Frey M, Browning K (2010) Biodegradability study on cotton and polyester fabrics. J Engineered Fibers Fabrics 5:42–53Google Scholar
  21. Lusher A.L., Tirelli V., O’Connor I and Officer R. (2015) Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: the first reported values of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Scientific Reports 5/14947, DOI:  10.1038/srep14947
  22. Mani T., Hauk A., Walter U. and BUrkhardt-Holm P. (2015) Microplastics profile along the Rhine River. Scientific Reports 5/17988, DOI:  10.1038/srep17988
  23. Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B (2016) Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 50:5800–5808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pirc U, Vidmar M, Mozer A, Kržan A (2016) Emissions of microplastic fibers from microfiber fleece during domestic washing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22206–22211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plastics - the Facts 2016: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data http://www.plasticseurope.org/documents/document/20150227150049-final_plastics_the_facts_2014_2015_260215.pdf
  26. Rocha-Santos T, Duarte AC (2015) A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behaviour of microplastics in the environment. Trends Anal Chem 65:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Romeo T, Pietro B, Pedà C, Consoli P, Andaloro F, Fossi MC (2015) First evidence of presence of plastic debris in stomach of large pelagic fish in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 95:358–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Setälä O, Fleming-Lehtinen V, Lehtiniemi M (2014) Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web. Environ Pollut 185:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Setälä O, Magnusson K, Lehtiniemi M, Noren F (2016) Distribution and abundance of surface water microlitter in the Baltic Sea: a comparison of two sampling methods. Mar Pollut Bull 110:177–183Google Scholar
  30. Sruthy S, Ramasamy EV (2017) Microplastic pollution in Vembanad Lake, Kerala, India: the first report of microplastics in lake and estuarine sediments in India. Environ Pollut 222:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Syberg K, Khan FR, Selck H, Palmqvist A, Banta GT, Daley J, Sano L, Duhaime MB (2015) Microplastics: addressing ecological risk through lessons learned. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Talvitie J, Heinonen M, Pääkkönen J-P, Vahtera E, Mikola A, Setälä O, Vahala R (2015) Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of micrroplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Water Sci Technol 72:1495–1504. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teuten EL, Saquing JM, Knappe DRU, Barlaz MA, Jonsson S, Björn A, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC, Galloway TS, Yamashita R, Ochi D, Watanuki Y, Moore C, Viet PH, Tana TS, Prudente M, Boonyatumanond R, Zakaria MP, Akkhavong K, Ogata Y, Hirai H, Iwasa S, Mizukawa K, Hagino Y, Imamura A, Saha M, Takada H (2009) Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:2027–2045. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Hal N, Ariel A, Angel DL (2016) Exceptionally high abundances of microplastics in the oligotrophic Israeli Mediterranean coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 116:151–155Google Scholar
  35. van Franeker JA, Blaize C, Danielsen J, Fairclough K, Gollan J, Guse N, Hansen PL, Heubeck M, Jensen JK, Le Guillou G, Olsen B, Olsen KO, Pedersen J, Stienen EW, Turner DM (2011) Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea. Environ Pollut 159:2609–2615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner M, Scherer C, Alvarez-Muñoz D, Brennholt N, Bourrain X, Buchinger S, Fries E, Grosbois C, Klasmeier J, Marti T, Rodroguez-Mozaz S, Urbatzka R, Vethaak AD, Winther-Nielsen M, Reifferscheid G (2014) Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. Environ Sci Eur 26:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamashita R, Takada H, Fukuwaka M, Watanuki Y (2011) Physical and chemical effects of ingested plastic debris on short-tailed shearwaters, Puffinus tenuirostris, in the North Pacific ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2845–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory CentreFinnish Environment InstituteHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations