Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. as contaminant protozoa of the main rivers of western Romania: genetic characterization and public health potential of the isolates
- 215 Downloads
The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence, contamination level, and public health significance of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in the primary rivers of western Romania. A total of 53 sampling points in the 24 most important western Romanian rivers in four counties (Arad, Bihor, Caraș-Severin, and Timiș) were investigated from March to September 2016. Surface water samples were collected by microfiber filtration. Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts were isolated using immunomagnetic separation (IMS) according to the USEPA 1623 method and, after staining with fluorescently labeled (FITC) monoclonal antibodies, were identified and counted under a microscope. The Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts were identified to species and assemblage/sub-assemblage level through the nested PCR–RFLP procedure targeting the 18S ribosomal RNA and gdh genes, respectively. PCR-based techniques were utilized for all water samples. Overall, 22 samples (41.5%) were determined to be positive for Giardia cysts (ranging from 0.05 to 300 cysts per liter), and four samples (7.5%) tested positive for Cryptosporidium oocysts (0.17–48 oocysts/l). G. duodenalis was molecularly identified in 13 water samples (24.5%), indicating the presence of the sub-assemblage A-II (n = 12) and assemblage E (n = 1). PCR–RFLP showed that two samples (3.8%) contained Cryptosporidium DNA, and the identified species were Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium canis. All positive results were successfully confirmed by DNA sequencing. Subtyping of the zoonotic C. parvum isolate based on sequence analysis of the GP60 gene revealed the occurrence of the IIaA16G1R1 subtype. The results of this study highlight considerable contamination of river waters with pathogenic Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp., suggesting a potential risk for the public and animal health. This report presents the first extended published description of the presence of Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in the aquatic environment in Romania.
KeywordsRiver water Giardia Cryptosporidium Western Romania Public health
This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS–UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-1300. The authors are extremely grateful to Ing. Anca Deac, Dr. Doru Morar, veterinary students, and water authorities for their indispensable contribution during sample collection and processing. The research was partially funded by the POSCCE Project SMIS No. 2669. Part of this work has been previously published as an abstract in Journal of Biotechnology 2016, 231(Suppl S): S84.
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Campbell AT, Robertson LJ, Smith V (1992) Viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts: correlation of in vitro excystation with inclusion or exclusion of fluorogenic vital dyes. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3499–3493Google Scholar
- EPA (2005) Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Method 1623: Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water by Filtration/IMS/FA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/epa-1623.pdf
- Lobo ML, Xiao L, Antunes F, Matos O (2009) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia genotypes and subtypes in raw and treated water in Portugal. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:732–737Google Scholar
- Nygård K, Schimmer B, Søbstad Ø, Tveit I (2004) Waterborne outbreak of giardiasis in Bergen, Norway. Euro Surveill 8:46Google Scholar
- Plutzer J, Karanis P, Domokos K, Törökné A, Márialigeti K (2008) Detection and characterization of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Hungarian raw, surface and sewage water samples by IFT, PCR and sequence analysis of the SSurRNA and GDH genes. Int J Hyg Environ Health 211:524–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xiao L, Ryan UM (2008) Molecular epidemiology. In: Fayer R, Xiao L (eds) Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis, second edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–172Google Scholar