Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 22, pp 18421–18433 | Cite as

Removal of the emerging contaminant bisphenol A by an ureasil–PEO hybrid membrane: experimental study and molecular dynamic simulation

  • Lilian K. de OliveiraEmail author
  • André L. A. Moura
  • Valdir Barbosa
  • Renato L. T. Parreira
  • Rodrigo S. Banegas
  • Giovanni F. Caramori
  • Katia J. Ciuffi
  • Eduardo F. Molina
Research Article

Abstract

This work reports the use of a cross-linked ureasil–PEO hybrid matrix (designated PEO800) as an efficient adsorbent to retain the emerging contaminant bisphenol A (BPA) from an aqueous medium. The in-deep experimental and theoretical results provide information about the interactions between PEO800 and BPA. The in situ UV-vis spectroscopy data and the pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, Elovich, and Morris–Webber intraparticle diffusion models allowed us to propose a three-step mechanism for the adsorption of BPA onto PEO800. The results indicate that the pseudo-first-order kinetic model effectively describes the adsorption of BPA onto PEO800. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the interaction of PEO800 with BPA, showing an alteration in the chemical environment of the polymer ether oxygen atoms present in the hybrid matrix. The molecular dynamic simulation provides further evidence that the BPA molecules interact preferentially with PEO. The amount of desorbed BPA depended on the pH and solvent used in the assays. This work provides new opportunities for using the hydrophilic ureasil–PEO matrix which has demonstrated its abilities in being a fast and easy alternative to successfully removing organic contaminants from aqueous mediums and therefore having potential applications in water remediation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Organic–inorganic hybrid Bisphenol A Adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support received from the Brazilian agencies CAPES, CNPq, and FAPESP (Project 2013/20455-2 and 2016/01501-1). We would like to thank Huntsman Performed Products for donating Jeffamines. We thank Dr. Fábio L. Pissetti (Departamento de Ciências Exatas Universidade Federal de Alfenas—Unifal-MG) for helping in DSC data collection efforts.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_9434_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1028 kb)

References

  1. Arampatzidou AC, Deliyanni EA (2016) Comparison of activation media and pyrolysis temperature for activated carbons development by pyrolysis of potato peels for effective adsorption of endocrine disruptor bisphenol-A. J Colloid Interface Sci 466:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekiari V, Lianos P (2006) Ureasil gels as a highly efficient adsorbent for water purification. Chem Mater 18:4142–4146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekiari V, Lianos P (2007) Use of ureasil gels to extract ions from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 147:184–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 91:6269–6271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bermudez VD, Poinsignon C, Armand MB (1997) Chemistry and physical properties of sulfamide and its derivatives: proton conducting materials. J Mater Chem 7:1677–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bermudez VD, Carlos LD, Alcacer L (1999) Sol-gel derived urea cross-linked organically modified silicates. 1. Room temperature mid-infrared spectra. Chem Mater 11:569–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce P, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2015) A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: Current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water Res 72:3–27Google Scholar
  8. Caravieri BB, de Oliveira PF, Furtado RA, Tavares DC, Nassar EJ, Ciuffi KJ, Molina EF (2014) Solubility enhancement of ibuprofen using tri-ureasil-PPO hybrid: structural, cytotoxic, and drug release investigation. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 72:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang HS, Choo KH, Lee B, Choi SJ (2009) The methods of identification, analysis, and removal of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in water. J Hazard Mater 172:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chinh NH, Kim N, Nguyen-Phan TD, Yoo IK, Shin E (2014): Adsorptive interaction of bisphenol A with mesoporous titanosilicate/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite materials: FT-IR and Raman analyses. Nanoscale Res Lett 9Google Scholar
  11. Choi KYJ, Dempsey BA (2004) In-line coagulation with low-pressure membrane filtration. Water Res 38:4271–4281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahmouche K, Santilli CV, Pulcinelli SH, Craievich AF (1999) Small-angle X-ray scattering study of sol-gel-derived siloxane-PEG and siloxane-PPG hybrid materials. J Phys Chem B 103:4937–4942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Oliveira LK, Molina EF, Moura ALA, de Faria EH, Ciuffi KJ (2016) Synthesis, characterization, and environmental applications of hybrid materials based on humic acid obtained by the sol gel route. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1478–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fei B, Chen C, Wu H, Peng SW, Wang XY, Dong LS (2003) Quantitative FTIR study of PHBV/bisphenol A blends. Eur Polym J 39:1939–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figueira RB, Silva CJR, Pereira EV, Salta MM (2014) Alcohol-aminosilicate hybrid coatings for corrosion protection of galvanized steel in mortar. J Electrochem Soc 161:C349–C362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freundlich FHM (1906) Uber die adsorption in Losungen, Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie. Z Phys Chem 385–470Google Scholar
  17. Fu LS, Ferreira RAS, Silva NJO, Carlos LD, Bermudez VD, Rocha J (2004) Photoluminescence and quantum yields of urea and urethane cross-linked nanohybrids derived from carboxylic acid solvolysis. Chem Mater 16:1507–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho YS (2006) Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. J Hazard Mater 136:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho YS, McKay G (2000) The kinetics of sorption of divalent metal ions onto sphagnum moss peat. Water Res 34:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffmann F, Froba M (2010) John Wiley & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffmann F, Froba M (2011) Vitalising porous inorganic silica networks with organic functions-PMOs and related hybrid materials. Chem Soc Rev 40:608–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffmann F, Cornelius M, Morell J, Froba M (2006) Silica-based mesoporous organic-inorganic hybrid materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:3216–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang YQ, Wong CKC, Zheng JS, Bouwman H, Barra R, Wahlstrom B, Neretin L, Wong MH (2012) Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ Int 42:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model 14:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katsigiannis A, Noutsopoulos C, Mantziaras J, Gioldasi M (2015) Removal of emerging pollutants through granular activated carbon. Chem Eng J 280:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim SD, Cho J, Kim IS, Vanderford BJ, Snyder SA (2007) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res 41:1013–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuroda K, Shimojima A, Kawahara K, Wakabayashi R, Tamura Y, Asakura Y, Kitahara M (2014) Utilization of Alkoxysilyl groups for the creation of structurally controlled siloxane-based nanomaterials. Chem Mater 26:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li SZ, Gong YB, Yang YC, He C, Hu LL, Zhu LF, Sun LP, Shu D (2015) Recyclable CNTs/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites as adsorbents to remove bisphenol A from water and their regeneration. Chem Eng J 260:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Low MJD (1960) Kinetics of chemisorption of gases on solids. Chem Soc Rev 267–312Google Scholar
  31. Malde AK, Zuo L, Breeze M, Stroet M, Poger D, Nair PC, Oostenbrink C, Mark AE (2011) An automated force field topology builder (ATB) and repository: version 1.0. J Chem Theory Comput 7:4026–4037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Molina EF, Parreira RLT, De Faria EH, de Carvalho HWP, Caramori GF, Coimbra DF, Nassar EJ, Ciuffi KJ (2014) Ureasil-poly(ethylene oxide) hybrid matrix for selective adsorption and separation of dyes from water. Langmuir 30:3857–3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moorthy MS, Park JH, Bae JH, Kim SH, Ha CS (2014) Mesoporous organosilica hybrids with a tunable amphoteric framework for controlled drug delivery. J Mater Chem B 2:6487–6499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreira S, Silva CJR, Prado L, Costa MFM, Boev VI, Martin-Sanchez J, Gomes MJM (2012) Development of new high transparent hybrid organic-inorganic monoliths with surface engraved diffraction pattern. J Poly Sci B Polym Phys 50:492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moura ALA, de Oliveira LK, Ciuffi KJ, Molina EF (2015) Influence of the hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of polyetheramines on the interaction between amine-alcohol-silicate hybrids and anionic dyes for effective water cleaning. J Mater Chem A 3:16020–16032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicole L, Laberty-Robert CR, Sanchez L (2014) Hybrid materials science: apromised land for the integrative design of multifunctional materials. Nanoscale 6267–6292Google Scholar
  37. Nunes SC, de Zea Bermudez V, Ostrovskii D, Barbosa PC, Silva MM, Smith MJ (2008) Cationic and anionic environments in LiTFSI-doped di-ureasils with application in solid-state electrochromic devices. Chem Phys 345(1):32–40Google Scholar
  38. Nunes SC, Hummer J, Freitas VT, Ferreira RAS, Carlos LD, Almeida P, Bermudez VD (2015) Di-amidosils with tunable structure, morphology and emission quantum yield: the role of hydrogen bonding. J Mater Chem C 3:6844–6861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oehlmann J, Oetken M, Schulte-Oehlmann U (2008) A critical evaluation of the environmental risk assessment for plasticizers in the freshwater environment in Europe, with special emphasis on bisphenol A and endocrine disruption. Environ Res 108:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oosternbrink CVA, Mark AE, Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 1656–1676Google Scholar
  41. Park C, Fang Y, Murthy SN, Novak JT (2010) Effects of floc aluminum onactivated sludge characteristics and removal of 17-α-ethinylestradiol in wastewater systems. Water Res 1335–1340Google Scholar
  42. Patino Y, Diaz E, Ordonez S (2015) Performance of different carbonaceous materials for emerging pollutants adsorption. Chemosphere 119:S124–S130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng S, Hao KY, Han F, Tang Z, Niu BB, Zhang X, Wang Z, Hong S (2015) Enhanced removal of bisphenol-AF onto chitosan-modified zeolite by sodium cholate in aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Polym 130:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rahardianto A, Gao JB, Gabelich CJ, Williams MD, Cohen Y (2007) High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water: integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO. J Membr Sci 289:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rathnayake SI, Xi YF, Frost RL, Ayoko GA (2016) Environmental applications of inorganic-organic clays for recalcitrant organic pollutants removal: Bisphenol A. J Colloid Interface Sci 470:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchez C, Julian B, Belleville P, Popall M (2005) Applications of hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 15:3559–3592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanchez C, Belleville P, Popall M, Nicole L (2011) Applications of advanced hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials: from laboratory to market. Chem Soc Rev 40:696–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santilli CV, Chiavacci LA, Lopes L, Pulcinelli SH, Oliveira AG (2009) Controlled drug release from ureasil-polyether hybrid materials. Chem Mater 21:463–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snyder SA, Adham S, Redding AM, Cannon FS, DeCarolis J, Oppenheimer J, Wert EC, Yoon Y (2007) Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination 202:156–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sui Q, Huang J, Liu YS, Chang XF, Ji GB, Deng SB, Xie T, Yu G (2011) Rapid removal of bisphenol A on highly ordered mesoporous carbon. J Environ Sci 23:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun YY, Chen M, Wang ZB, Wu LM (2014) Facile synthesis of asymmetric Ag-organosilica hybrid nanoparticles with tunable morphologies and optical properties. Chem Commun 50:5767–5770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thanhmingliana, Lee SM, Tiwari D (2014) Use of hybrid materials in the decontamination of bisphenol A from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv 4:43921–43930Google Scholar
  53. vom-Saal FSV, Nagel SC, Palanza P, Boechler M, Parmigiani S, Welshons WV (1995) Estrogenic pesticides: binding relative to estradiol in MCF-7 cells and effects of exposure during fetal life on subsequent territorial behaviour in male mice. Toxicol Lett 3343–350Google Scholar
  54. Walcarius A, Mercier L (2010) Mesoporous organosilica adsorbents: nanoengineered materials for removal of organic and inorganic pollutants. J Mater Chem 20:4478–4511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang CY, Zhang H, Li F, Zhu LY (2010) Degradation and mineralization of bisphenol a by mesoporous Bi2WO6 under simulated solar light irradiation. Environ Sci Technol 44:6843–6848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber WJJ (1963) Kinetics of adsorption of carbono from solution. In: Morris JC (Hrsg.). Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. Sanitary Engineering Division, pp 31–59Google Scholar
  57. Welshons WV, Nagel SC, vom Saal FS (2006) Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology 147:S56–S69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yasushi T, Osamu T, Yumiko I, Hisahiko H, Yutaka OMM, Yano T, Yuji T (2000) Estrogen receptor-mediated effects of a xenoestrogen, bisphenol A, on preimplantation mouse embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 918–921Google Scholar
  59. Yoon S, Ichikawa K, Macknight WJ, Hsu SL (1995) Spectroscopic analysis of chain conformation of poly(propylene oxide)-based polymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 28:4278–4283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang L, Qiao SZ, Jin YG, Chen ZG, Gu HC, Lu GQ (2008) Magnetic hollow spheres of periodic mesoporous organosilica and Fe3O4 nanocrystals: fabrication and structure control. Adv Mater 20:805–80+CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang L, Fang P, Yang LJ, Zhang J, Wang X (2013) Rapid method for the separation and recovery of endocrine-disrupting compound bisphenol AP from wastewater. Langmuir 29:3968–3975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou XY, Wei JF, Liu K, Liu NN, Zhou B (2014) Adsorption of bisphenol a based on synergy between hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction. Langmuir 30:13861–13868CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilian K. de Oliveira
    • 1
    Email author
  • André L. A. Moura
    • 1
  • Valdir Barbosa
    • 1
  • Renato L. T. Parreira
    • 1
  • Rodrigo S. Banegas
    • 2
  • Giovanni F. Caramori
    • 2
  • Katia J. Ciuffi
    • 1
  • Eduardo F. Molina
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade de FrancaFrancaBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário TrindadeFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations