Urinary metabolomic profiling in rats exposed to dietary di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) using ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF-MS)
- 600 Downloads
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is an omnipresent environmental chemical with widespread nonoccupational human exposure through multiple ways. Although considerable efforts have been invested to investigate mechanisms of DEHP toxicity, the key metabolic biomarkers of DEHP toxicity remain to be identified. The aim of this study was to assess the urinary metabonomics of dietary DEHP in rats using the technique of ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF-MS). Fourteen female Wistar rats were divided into two groups and given increasing dietary doses of DEHP for 30 consecutive days. The urinary metabolite profile was studied using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) enabled clusters to be clearly separated. Eleven principal urinary metabolites were identified as contributing to the clusters. The clusters in the positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode were xanthurenic acid, kynurenic acid, nonate, N6-methyladenosine, and L-isoleucyl-L-proline. The clusters in the negative ESI mode were hippuric acid, tetrahydrocortisol, citric acid, phenylpropionylglycine, cPA(18:2(9Z, 12Z)/0:0), and LysoPC(14:1(9Z)). The urinary metabonomic changes indicated that exposure to dietary DEHP can affect energy-related metabolism, liver and renal function, fatty acid metabolism, and cause DNA damage in rats. The findings of this study on the urinary metabolites and metabolic pathways of DEHP may form the basis for future studies on the mechanisms of toxicity of this commonly found environmental chemical.
KeywordsDi(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Environmental chemical Toxic effects Metabonomics Biomarker Mechanism
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81273079). The present study was conducted in the laboratory of the Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Food Hygiene (Harbin Medical University), Heilongjiang Higher Education Institutions.
Compliance with ethical standards
All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Harbin Medical and were in accordance with the policies on the care and use of animals of the current Chinese legislation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Dong X et al (2017) Effects of long-term in vivo exposure to di-2-ethylhexylphthalate on thyroid hormones and the TSH/TSHR signaling pathways in Wistar rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):44. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010044
- Fukuwatari T, Ohta M, Sugimoto E, Sasaki R, Shibata K (2004) Effects of dietary di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, a putative endocrine disrupter, on enzyme activities involved in the metabolism of tryptophan to niacin in rats. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1672:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hannas BR, Lambright CS, Furr J, Howdeshell KL, Wilson VS, Gray LE Jr (2011) Dose-response assessment of fetal testosterone production and gene expression levels in rat testes following in utero exposure to diethylhexyl phthalate, diisobutyl phthalate, diisoheptyl phthalate, and diisononyl phthalate. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 123:206–216. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howdeshell KL, Hotchkiss AK, Gray LE Jr (2016) Cumulative effects of antiandrogenic chemical mixtures and their relevance to human health risk assessment. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 220(2 Pt A):179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.007
- Hu X et al (2014) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 enzyme activity effect after exposures phthalate esters in maternal. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chin J Prev Med] 48:800–804Google Scholar
- Huang Q, Zhang H, Chen YJ, Chi YL, Dong S (2016) The inflammation response to DEHP through PPARgamma in endometrial cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(3):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030318
- Lake BG, Gray TJ, Gangolli SD (1986) Hepatic effects of phthalate esters and related compounds—in vivo and in vitro correlations. Environ Health Perspect 67:283–290Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2008) Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment the task ahead. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.17226/12528
- Pawlak D, Tankiewicz A, Buczko W (2001) Kynurenine and its metabolites in the rat with experimental renal insufficiency. J Physiol Pharmacol Off J Pol Physiol Soc 52:755–766Google Scholar
- Skakkebaek NE (2002) Endocrine disrupters and testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Horm Res 57(Suppl 2):43Google Scholar
- Strakovsky RS, Lezmi S, Shkoda I, Flaws JA, Helferich WG, Pan YX (2015) In utero growth restriction and catch-up adipogenesis after developmental di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure cause glucose intolerance in adult male rats following a high-fat dietary challenge. J Nutr Biochem 26:1208–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang C, Zhang M, Sun Y, Li J, Fang M, Zhu X, Liu C (2012) Effect of dibutyl phthalate and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on urine SOD activity and MDA content in rats. Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = J Southern Med Univ 32:160–164Google Scholar