Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option
- 1.4k Downloads
Although bottom ash (BA) [or mixtures of bottom and fly ash (FA)] from clean biomass fuels is currently used as liming agent, additive for compost, and fertilizer on agricultural and forest soils in certain European countries, in several other countries most of the ashes are currently disposed in landfills. This is due to both a lack of a proper classification of the materials and of regulatory barriers.
Chemical characterization including analysis of an array of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) proved that over 100,000 tons of BA currently landfilled every year in Portugal actually complied with legal limits for PTEs for soil fertilizers applied in other countries. Pot experiments were conducted, testing three dosages of BA and FA (1, 2.5, and 5%, in weight) in three mining soils with different properties. Additions of ash materials to soils led to an increase in the pore water pH relative to control pots (0% of ash added) and had a clear impact on DOC and on the solubilization of both macro- and micronutrients (notably Cu).
The results from the case study using BA and FA from a Portuguese biomass thermal power plant demonstrate that it is imperative to further develop a regulatory framework to alleviate technological and environmental barriers for biomass ash utilization as raw material for fertilizers and/or soil liming agent, in accordance with the goals of the circular economy. A more harmonized view on how to assess the merits and risks of the re-use of these materials is also needed.
KeywordsPortugal Bottom ash Fly ash Recycling Soil amendment
This work was supported by European Funds through “Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade—COMPETE” and by National Funds through the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) within project PEst-C/MAR/LA0017/2013. S.M.R. acknowledges the financial support from FCT (Project IF/01637/2013). The authors also acknowledge the financial support of both FCT and COMPETE through Project no. FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-02800 (FCT PTDC/AGR-PRO/4091/2012) and of the European Commission through Project LIFE14 ENV/PT/000369.
- EC (European Commission). 2011. Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. COM/11/13. 19/1/2011, Brussels.Google Scholar
- EC (European Commission). 2015. Closing the loop: Commission adopts ambitious new Circular Economy Package to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth. IP/15/6203. 2/12/2015. Brussels.Google Scholar
- EC (European Commission) (2016a) Ordinance reorganising sewage sludge recovery (Sewage Sludge Ordinance). TRIS/16/02979. 27/12/2016. Brussels.Google Scholar
- EC (European Commission) (2016b) Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and the council - laying down rules on the making available on the market of CE marked fertilizing products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009. COM (2016), 157. 17/03/2016. Brussels.Google Scholar
- Gianfreda L (2015) Enzymes of importance to rhizosphere processes. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15(2):283–306Google Scholar
- Obernberger I, Supancic K (2009) Possibilities of ash utilization from biomass combustion plants. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition. Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Pels JR, Sarabèr AJ (2011) Utilization of Biomass Ashes. In: Grammelis P (ed) Solid Biofuels for Energy: A Greenhouse Gas Alternative. 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, London pp 219-235Google Scholar
- Pels JR, de Nie DS, Kiel JHA (2005) Utilization of ashes from biomass combustion and gasification. In: Proceedings of the 14th European biomass Conference & Exhibition. France, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues SM, Henriques B, Ferreira da Silva E, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Römkens PFAM (2010b) Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of twenty potentially toxic elements in soils: part I—the role of key soil properties in the variation of contaminants’ reactivity. Chemosphere 81:1549–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues SM, Henriques B, Ferreira da Silva E, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Groenenberg JA, Römkens PFAM (2010a) Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of 20 potentially toxic elements in soils: part II—solid-solution partition relationships and ion activity in soil solutions. Chemosphere 81:1560–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ronen E (2007) Micro-elements in agriculture. Practical Hydroponics & Greenhouses 6:39–48Google Scholar
- Smith JL, Doran JW (1996) Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, pp 169–185Google Scholar
- Tarelho, L.A.C., Teixeira, E.R., Silva, D.F.R., Modolo, R.C.E., Silva, J.J.F., 2012. Characteristics, management, and applications of ashes from thermochemical conversion of biomass to energy. Proceedings of the World Bioenergy 2012, Conference and Exhibition on Biomass for Energy. Jonkoping, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Van Eijk, R.J., Obernberger, I., Supancic, K., 2012. Options for increased utilization of ash from biomass combustion and co-firing. KEMA Report, Arnhem, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Van Swaaij, W., Kersten, S., Paltz, W., 2015. Biomass power for the world: transformations to effective use—6th volume, first ed. Pan Stanford Publishing PTE. Ltd., Singapore.Google Scholar