Advertisement

Electrocatalytic water treatment using carbon nanotube filters modified with metal oxides

  • So Young Yang
  • Chad D. Vecitis
  • Hyunwoong Park
Water Industry: Water-Energy-Health Nexus

Abstract

This study examined the electrocatalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotube (CNT) filters for remediation of aqueous phenol in a sodium sulfate electrolyte. CNT filters were loaded with antimony-doped tin oxide (Sb-SnO2; SS) and bismuth- and antimony-codoped tin oxide (Bi-Sb-SnO2; BSS) via electrosorption at 2 V for 1 h and then assembled into a flow-through batch reactor as anode–cathode couples with perforated titanium foils. The as-synthesized pristine CNT filters were composed of 50–60-nm-thick tubular carbons with smooth surfaces, whereas the tubes composing the SS-CNT and BSS-CNT filters were slightly thicker and bumpy, because they were coated with SS and BSS particles ~50 nm in size. Electrochemical characterization of the samples indicated a positive shift in the onset potential and a decrease in the current magnitude in the modified CNT filters due to passivation and oxidation inhibition of the bare CNT filters. These filters exhibited a similar adsorption capacity for phenol (5–8%), whereas loadings of SS and BSS enhanced the degradation rate of phenol by ~1.5 and 2.1 times, respectively. In particular, the total organic carbon removal performance and mineralization efficiency of the BSS-CNT filters were approximately twice those of the bare CNT filters. The BSS-CNT filters also exhibited an enhanced oxidation of ferrocyanide [FeII(CN)6 4−], which was not adsorbed onto the CNT filters. The enhanced electrocatalytic performance of the modified CNT filters was attributed to an effective generation of OH radicals. The surfaces of the filters were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy.

Keywords

Electrochemical filter Carbon nanotubes Metal oxides Reactive oxygen species Hybrids 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Global Research Network Program (2014S1A2A2027802), the Basic Science Research Program (2016R1A2B4007366), and the Nano Material Technology Development Program (2016M3A7B4908169) through the National Research Foundation, Korea.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_8495_MOESM1_ESM.docx (790 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 790 kb)

References

  1. Ahn YY, Yang SY, Choi C, Choi W, Kim S, Park H (2017) Electrocatalytic activities of Sb-SnO2 and Bi-TiO2 anodes for water treatment: effects of electrocatalyst composition and electrolyte. Catal Today 282:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajmani GS, Goodwin D, Marsh K, Fairbrother DH, Schwab KJ, Jacangelo JG, Huang H (2012) Modification of low pressure membranes with carbon nanotube layers for fouling control. Water Res 46:5645–5654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baek Y, Kim C, Seo DK, Kim T, Lee JS, Kim YH, Ahn KH, Bae SS, Lee SC, Lim J, Lee K, Yoon J (2014) High performance and antifouling vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane for water purification. J Membr Sci 460:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasubramanian K, Burghard M (2005) Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes. Small 1:180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Lannoy C-F, Jassby D, Gloe K, Gordon AD, Wiesner MR (2013) Aquatic biofouling prevention by electrically charged nanocomposite polymer thin film membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:2760–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng S, Zhang Q, Nie Y, Wei H, Wang B, Huang J, Yu G, Xing B (2012) Sorption mechanisms of perfluorinated compounds on carbon nanotubes. Environ Pollut 168:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao G, Vecitis CD (2011) Electrochemical carbon nanotube filter oxidative performance as a function of surface chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:9726–9734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu F, Cui X, Chen W (2010) Pulse electro-codeposition of Ti/SnO2-Sb2O4-CNT electrode for phenol oxidation. Electrochem Solid State Lett 13:F20–F23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jame SA, Zhou Z (2016) Electrochemical carbon nanotube filters for water and wastewater treatment. Nanotech Rev 5:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim YK, Park H (2011) Light-harvesting multi-walled carbon nanotubes and CdS hybrids: application to photocatalytic hydrogen production from water. Energy Environ Sci 4:685–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim YK, Park H (2012) How and to what extent do carbon materials catalyze solar hydrogen production from water? Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 125:530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Choi SK, Yoon BY, Lim SK, Park H (2010) Effects of electrolyte on the electrocatalytic activities of RuO2/Ti and Sb-SnO2/Ti anodes for water treatment. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 97:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim J, Choi WJK, Choi J, Hoffmann MR, Park H (2013) Electrolysis of urea and urine for solar hydrogen. Catal Today 199:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu H, Vajpayee A, Vecitis CD (2013a) Bismuth-doped tin oxide-coated carbon nanotube network: improved anode stability and efficiency for flow-through organic electrooxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10054–10066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu X, Wang M, Zhang S, Pan B (2013b) Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: a review. J Environ Sci 25:1263–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu YB, Lee JHD, Xia Q, Ma Y, Yu Y, Yung LYL, Xie JP, Ong CN, Vecitis CD, Zhou Z (2014) A graphene-based electrochemical filter for water purification. J Mater Chem A 2:16554–16562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Y, Liu H, Zhou Z, Wang T, Ong CN, Vecitis CD (2015) Degradation of the common aqueous antibiotic tetracycline using a carbon nanotube electrochemical filter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:7974–7980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maas M (2016) Carbon nanomaterials as antibacterial colloids. Materials 9:617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pan B, Xing B (2008) Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:9005–9013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park H, Bak A, Ahn YY, Choi J, Hoffmannn MR (2012) Photoelectrochemical performance of multi-layered BiOx-TiO2/Ti electrodes for degradation of phenol and production of molecular hydrogen in water. J Hazard Mater 211:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnoor MH, Vecitis CD (2013) Quantitative examination of aqueous ferrocyanide oxidation in a carbon nanotube electrochemical filter: effects of flow rate, ionic strength, and cathode material. J Phys Chem C 117:2855–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vecitis CD, Gao G, Liu H (2011a) Electrochemical carbon nanotube filter for adsorption, desorption, and oxidation of aqueous dyes and anions. J Phys Chem C 115:3621–3629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vecitis CD, Schnoor MH, Rahaman MS, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2011b) Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for viral and bacterial removal and inactivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:3672–3679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang SY, Choo YS, Kim S, Lim SK, Lee J, Park H (2012) Boosting the electrocatalytic activities of SnO2 electrodes for remediation of aqueous pollutants by doping with various metals. Appl Catal B-Environ 111:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang SY, Kim D, Park H (2014) Shift of the reactive species in the Sb-SnO2-electrocatalyzed inactivation of E-coli and degradation of phenol: effects of nickel doping and electrolytes. Environ Sci Technol 48:2877–2884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang SY, Choi W, Park H (2015) TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrocatalyst and Ni-Sb-SnO2 electrocatalyst bifacial electrodes: a new type of bifunctional hybrid platform for water treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:1907–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental, and Energy EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.School of Engineering and Applied SciencesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.School of Energy EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  4. 4.Advanced Institute of Water IndustryKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations