Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models
- 260 Downloads
Vulnerability indices of an aquifer assessed by different fuzzy logic (FL) models often give rise to differing values with no theoretical or empirical basis to establish a validated baseline or to develop a comparison basis between the modeling results and baselines, if any. Therefore, this research presents a supervised committee fuzzy logic (SCFL) method, which uses artificial neural networks to overarch and combine a selection of FL models. The indices are expressed by the widely used DRASTIC framework, which include geological, hydrological, and hydrogeological parameters often subject to uncertainty. DRASTIC indices represent collectively intrinsic (or natural) vulnerability and give a sense of contaminants, such as nitrate-N, percolating to aquifers from the surface. The study area is an aquifer in Ardabil plain, the province of Ardabil, northwest Iran. Improvements on vulnerability indices are achieved by FL techniques, which comprise Sugeno fuzzy logic (SFL), Mamdani fuzzy logic (MFL), and Larsen fuzzy logic (LFL). As the correlation between estimated DRASTIC vulnerability index values and nitrate-N values is as low as 0.4, it is improved significantly by FL models (SFL, MFL, and LFL), which perform in similar ways but have differences. Their synergy is exploited by SCFL and uses the FL modeling results “conditioned” by nitrate-N values to raise their correlation to higher than 0.9.
KeywordsArdabil aquifer Fuzzy logic Supervised committee fuzzy logic (SCFL) Vulnerability index
The authors acknowledge gratefully the provision of data by the Ardabil Regional Water Authority.
- Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. EPA 600/2–87-035. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OklahomaGoogle Scholar
- Baghapour MA, Nobandegani AF, Talebbeydokhti N, Bagherzadeh S, Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Chitsazan N (2016) Optimization of DRASTIC method by artificial neural network, nitrate vulnerability index, and composite DRASTIC models to assess groundwater vulnerability for unconfined aquifer of Shiraz plain, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2016 14:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chitsazan N, Nadiri AA, Tsai F, Moghaddam, A (2014) Bayesian artificial intelligence model averaging for hydraulic conductivity estimation J. Hydrol. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE) HE.1943–5584.0000824, 520–532.
- Chiu S (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2:267–278Google Scholar
- de Martonne E (1925) Trait’e de G’eographie Physique: 3 tomes, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Dixon B (2004) Prediction of groundwater vulnerability using integrated GIS-based neuro-fuzzy techniques. J Spatial Hydrology 4(2):1–38Google Scholar
- Emberger L (1930) Sur une formule applicable en g’eographie botanique. Cah Herb Seanc Acad Sci 191:389–390Google Scholar
- Kord M, Asghari Moghaddam A (2013) Spatial analysis of Ardabil plain aquifer potable groundwater using fuzzy logic. J. King Saud University – Science. 1–12Google Scholar
- Kord M, Asghari Moghaddam A, Nakhaeei M (2013) Investigation of hydrogeological characteristics of Ardabil plain aquifer. ISESCO JOURNAL of Science and Technology 9(15):63–69Google Scholar
- Labani MM, Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi A, Salahshoor K (2010) Estimation of NMR log parameters from conventional well log data using a committee machine with intelligent systems: a case study from the Iranian part of the South Pars Gas Field. Persian Gulf Basin Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 72:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee KH (2004) First course on fuzzy, theory and applications. Springer, Berlin, 335pGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Philip CL, Huang HP (2001) Fuzzy neural intelligent systems: mathematical foundation and the applications in engineering. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Nadiri AA (2015) Application of artificial intelligence methods in geosciences and hydrology. OMICS International Publications.Google Scholar
- Rahimzadeh F, Babakhani AR (1987) Geological map of Ardabil (1:250,000). Geological Survey of IranGoogle Scholar
- Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Ahmadi A (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using fuzzy logic: a case study in the Zayandehrood aquifers, Iran. J Environmental Management 51:267–277Google Scholar
- Scanlon B, Healy R, Cook P (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrology Journal 10(1):18–39Google Scholar
- Sugeno M (1985) Industrial application of fuzzy control. North-Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (2009) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA816-F-09-004Google Scholar
- WHO (2009). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Word Health Organization.Google Scholar