Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecotoxicity thresholds for ametryn, diuron, hexazinone and simazine in fresh and marine waters

  • Environmental Quality Benchmarks for Aquatic Ecosystem Protection: Derivation and Application
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triazine and urea herbicides are two groups of photosystem II inhibiting herbicides frequently detected in surface, ground and marine waters. Yet, there are few water quality guidelines for herbicides. Ecotoxicity thresholds (ETs) for ametryn, hexazinone and simazine (triazine herbicides) and diuron (a urea herbicide) were calculated using the Australian and New Zealand method for deriving guideline values to protect fresh and marine ecosystems. Four ETs were derived for each chemical and ecosystem that should theoretically protect 99, 95, 90 and 80% of species (i.e. PC99, PC95, PC90 and PC80, respectively). For all four herbicides, the phototrophic species were significantly more sensitive than non-phototrophic species, and therefore, only the former data were used to calculate the ETs. Comparison of the ET values to measured concentrations in 2606 samples from 15 waterways that discharge to the Great Barrier Reef (2011–2015) found three exceedances of the simazine PC99, regular exceedances (up to 30%) of the PC99 in a limited number of rivers for ametryn and hexazinone and frequent (> 40%) exceedances of the PC99 and PC95 ETs in at least four waterways for diuron. There were no exceedances of the marine ETs in inshore reef areas. Further, ecotoxicity data are required for ametryn and hexazinone to fresh and marine phototrophic species, for simazine to marine phototrophic species, for tropical phototrophic species, repeated pulse exposures and long-term (2 to 12 months) exposures to environmentally relevant concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of a considerably larger project to derive ET values for 45 pesticides that was funded by: the National Water Reform Committee, Australian Department of Environment and Energy, the National Environmental Sciences Program (NESP), the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) and the Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation (DSITI). Two anonymous referees helped improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael St. J. Warne.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 27 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 116 kb)

Table S4

(DOCX 40 kb)

Table S5

(DOCX 12 kb)

Table S6

(DOCX 30 kb)

Table S7

(DOCX 29 kb)

Table S8

(DOCX 57 kb)

Table S9

(DOCX 25 kb)

Table S10

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warne, M.S.J., King, O. & Smith, R.A. Ecotoxicity thresholds for ametryn, diuron, hexazinone and simazine in fresh and marine waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 3151–3169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1097-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1097-5

Keywords