Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 970–974 | Cite as

Looking at biological community level to improve ecotoxicological assessment of freshwater sediments: report on a first French-Swiss workshop

  • Stéphane PesceEmail author
  • Olivier Perceval
  • Chloé Bonnineau
  • Carmen Casado-Martinez
  • Aymeric Dabrin
  • Emilie Lyautey
  • Emmanuel Naffrechoux
  • Benoit J.D. FerrariEmail author
Conference Report


The first French-Swiss workshop on ecotoxicology of freshwater sediment communities was co-organized by the French Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (Irstea) and the Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre EAWAG-EPFL) in Villié-Morgon (Beaujolais Region, France) on April 27–28, 2017. The workshop brought together scientists working in different fields of expertise (ecotoxicologists, ecologists, environmental chemists…), environmental stakeholder groups and managers, as well as economic players (start-ups and consultancies) to better connect research needs of potential end-users with research outputs. The objectives of this workshop were (i) to establish the state of the art of research in the characterization of sediment contamination and in the evaluation of the effects on sediment-associated biological communities and ecosystem functioning and (ii) to give an overview of the French and Swiss regulations dealing with the assessment of contaminated sediments in freshwater ecosystems. The ultimate goal was to collectively identify research needs and knowledge gaps, as well as to highlight ways to improve the ecotoxicological assessment of sediments in freshwater environments by further considering the structure and functions of associated microbial and invertebrate communities.


Sediment ecotoxicity Environmental risk assessment Structural and functional effects Sediment exposure Bioavailability Microbial ecotoxicology Invertebrates 



We would like to thank the Municipality of Villié-Morgon for granting us the space to host our workshop and our colleagues from Irstea who were closely involved in the workshop organization: Vanessa Aburegaiba, Catherine Ambroise-Rendu, Anaïs Charton, and Bernard Motte. We are also grateful to Dr. Inge Werner for her careful reading of and valuable comments on the manuscript.

Funding Information

This workshop benefited from funding from the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, the French Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (Irstea) and the Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre Eawag-EPFL).


  1. Clements WH, Rohr JR (2009) Community responses to contaminants: using basic ecological principles to predict ecotoxicological effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1789–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Deckere E, de Cooman W, Leloup V, Meire P, Schmitt C, von der Ohe PC (2011) Development of sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. J. Soil. Sed. 11:504–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission, 2010. Common implementation strategy for water the Framework Directive (2000/60/EC): Guidance document no. 25 on chemical monitoring of sediment and biota under the water Framework DirectiveGoogle Scholar
  4. Flück R, Campiche S, De Alencastro LF, Rossi L, Ferrari BJD, Santiago S, Werner I, Chèvre N (2012) Surveillance de la qualité des sédiments. État actuel des méthodes disponibles et mise en place de recommandations Aqua & Gas 92:18–22Google Scholar
  5. Förstner U (2009) Sediments and priority substances in river basins. J Soil Sed 9:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gessner MO, Tlili A (2016) Fostering integration of freshwater ecology with ecotoxicology. Freshw Biol 61:1991–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghiglione JF, Martin-Laurent F, Pesce S (2016) Microbial ecotoxicology: an emerging discipline facing contemporary environmental threats. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:3981–3983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lafont M, Jézéquel C, Vivier A, Breil P, Schmitt L, Bernoud S (2010) Refinement of biomonitoring of urban water courses by combining descriptive and ecohydrological approaches. Ecohydro Hydrobiol 10:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ranjard L, Dequiedt S, Jolivet C, Saby NPA, Thioulouse J, Harmand J, Loisel P, Rapaport A, Fall S, Simonet P, Joffre R, Boure NC-P, Maron P-A, Mougel C, Martin MP, Toutain B, Arrouays D, Lemanceau P (2010) Biogeography of soil microbial communities: a review and a description of the ongoing French national initiative. Agron Sustain Dev 30:359–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Segner H, 2007. Ecotoxicology-how to assess the impact of toxicants in a multifactorial environment. In: Mothersill C, Mosse I, Seymour C (Eds.) Multiple stressors: a challenge for the future. Springer (NATO Science) 39–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IrsteaUR MALYVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.Agence Française pour la BiodiversitéAFBVincennesFrance
  3. 3.Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL (Ecotox Centre)EPFL-ENAC-IIE-GELausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Univ. Savoie Mont BlancINRA, CARRTELChambéryFrance
  5. 5.Univ. Savoie Mont BlancLCMEChambéryFrance

Personalised recommendations