Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 21, pp 20527–20539 | Cite as

Identification of surfactants and its correlation with physicochemical parameters at the confluence region of Vembanad Lake in India

  • Subha Sasi
  • Manoj P. Rayaroth
  • Charuvila T. Aravindakumar
  • Usha K. Aravind
Water: From Pollution to Purification
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

The present study describes the monitoring of some of the major classes of surfactants in water. The separation, identification, and the quantitative estimation of the compounds were achieved using LC-Q-ToF-MS. The analyses revealed the presence of variety of surfactants including linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), alcohol ethoxysulfates (AES), and alcohol ethoxylates (AE). Further, emphasis was given to AES as they are one of the most produced and consumed surfactants in the world. And as far as India is concerned, the present study is one of the most significant attempt regarding the identification and quantification of AES. The data obtained during the analysis revealed that the average concentration of AES C12Ex varied from 0.7 to 13.6 μg L−1 while that of C14Ex ranged between 1.3 and 10.4 μg L−1. The risk assessment revealed that higher chain AES are capable of posing medium level risk to the aquatic compartment. In addition, the study also included the physicochemical analysis of water from the selected area. Water was found to be acidic in nature and the salinity, TDS, and EC values were found to be high during the pre-monsoon season. The order of the levels of anionic constituents was of Cl>SO4 2−SO4 2−>F>NO3 2− ≅ PO4 2− while that of cations were Na+ > Mg2+ > K+ > Ca2+. Results of correlation analysis showed that statistically negative correlation exists between AES homologs and pH while slight positive correlations were found between AES and other parameters including TDS and EC. The suitability of this water for domestic and agricultural purposes has been examined on the ground of basic quality indices such as the water quality index (WQI) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). The WQI measurements also revealed that the water quality of the region falls under the “very poor” category especially during the pre-monsoon season. The study could explore the cumulative share of these canals in the quality impairment of the receiving Vembanad Lake.

Keywords

Surfactants Anionic surfactants LC-Q-ToF-MS Ion chemistry Risk assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment (KSCSTE). Also, we are extremely thankful for the kind gift of AES standard to Professor Gianni Golemme, University of Calabria, Italy.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_563_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2973 kb)
11356_2017_563_MOESM2_ESM.docx (11 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 11 kb)

References

  1. Al-Khashman OA, Jaradat AQ (2014) Assessment of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural uses in arid environment. Stoch Env Res Risk A 28:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cantarero S, Camino-Sanchez FJ, Zafra-Gomez A, Ballesteros O, Navalon A, Vılchez JL, Verge C, Reis MS, Saraiva PM (2012) Evaluation of the presence of major anionic surfactants in marine sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 64:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlsen L, Metzon MB, Kjelsmark J (2002) Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) in the terrestrial environment. Sci Total Environ 290:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalli L, Cassani G, Vigano G, Pravettoni S, Nucci Lazzarin M, Zatta A (2000) Surfactants in sediments. Tenside Surfactant Deterg 37:282–288Google Scholar
  5. Cowan-Ellsberry C, Belanger S, Dorn P, Dyer S, McAvoy D, Sanderson H, Versteeg D, Ferrer D, Stanton K (2014) Environmental safety of the use of major surfactant classes in North America. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:1893–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyer SD, Stanton DT, Lauth JR, Cherry DS (2000) Structure–activity relationships for acute and chronic toxicity of alcohol ether sulfates. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:608–616Google Scholar
  7. Elangovan NS, Dharmendirakumar M (2013) Assessment of groundwater quality along the Cooum River, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. J Chem 2013:1–10Google Scholar
  8. Feijtel TCJ, Matthijs E, Rottiers A, Rijs GBJ, Kiewiet A, de Nijs A (1995) AIS/CESIO environmental surfactant monitoring programme. Part 1: LAS monitoring study in “de Meern” sewage treatment plant and receiving river “Leidsche Rijn”. Chemosphere 30:1053–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández-Ramos C, Ballesteros O, Blanc R, Zafra-Gómez A, Camino-Sánchez FJ, Navalón A, Vílchez JL (2013a) Determination of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ethoxysulfates in marine and river sediments using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 115:606–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernández-Ramos C, Ballesteros O, Zafra-Gómez A, Blanc R, Navalón A, Vílchez JL (2013b) Determination of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ethoxysulfates in wastewater samples by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Microchem J 106:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernández-Ramos C, Ballesteros O, Zafra-Gómez A, Camino-Sánchez FJ, Blanc R, Navalón A, Pérez-Trujillo JP, Vílchez JL (2014a) Evaluation of the levels of alcohol sulfates and ethoxysulfates in marine sediments near wastewater discharge points along the coast of Tenerife Island. Mar Pollut Bull 79:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernández-Ramos C, Ballesteros O, Zafra-Gómez A, Camino-Sánchez FJ, Blanc R, Navalón A, Vílchez JL (2014b) Environmental monitoring of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ethoxysulfates in marine sediments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4286–4296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field JA, Barber LB, Thurman EM, Moore BL, Lawrence DL, Peake DA (1992) Fate of alkylbenzenesulfonates and dialkyltetralinsulfonates in sewage-contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 26:1140–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. George AL (2002) Seasonal factors affecting surfactant biodegradation in Antarctic coastal waters: comparison of a polluted and pristine site. Mar Environ Res 53:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez V, Ferreres L, Pocurull E, Borrull F (2011) Determination of non-ionic and anionic surfactants in environmental water matrices. Talanta 84:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González-Mazo E, León VM, Sáez M, Gómez-Parra A (2002) Occurrence and distribution of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates and sulfophenylcarboxylic acids in several Iberian littoral ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 288:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hampel M, Mauffret A, Pazdro K, Blasco J (2012) Anionic surfactant linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) in sediments from the Gulf of Gdansk (southern Baltic Sea, Poland) and its environmental implications. Environ Monit Assess 184:6013–6023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. HERA-Human and Environmental Risk Assessment on Ingredients of Household Cleaning Products (2004) Alcohol ethoxysulphates (AES): environmental risk assessment. [cited 2015 October 30]. Available from: http://www.heraproject.com/files/1-E-04-HERA%20AES%20ENV%20%20web%20wd.pdf
  19. Igbedioh SO (1991) Effects of agricultural pesticides on humans, animals, and higher plants in developing countries. Arch Environ Health 46:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson M, Eadsforth C, Schowanek D, Delfosse T, Riddle A, Budgen N (2016) Comprehensive review of several surfactants in marine environments: fate and ecotoxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1077–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jewett BN, Ramaley L, Kwak JCT (1999) Atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry techniques for the analysis of alkyl ethoxysulfate mixtures. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 10:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan AE, Ireson A, Kovats S, Mojumder SA, Khusru A, Rahman A, Vineis P (2011) Drinking water salinity and maternal health in coastal Bangladesh: implications of climate change. Environ Health Perspect 119:1328–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laha S, Tansel B, Ussawarujikulchai A (2009) Surfactant–soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds: a review. J Environ Manag 90:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lara-Martín PA, Gómez-Parra A, González-Mazo E (2005) Determination and distribution of alkyl ethoxysulfates and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in coastal marine sediments from the Bay of Cadiz (southwest of Spain). Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2196–2202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lara-Martín PA, Gómez-Parra A, González-Mazo E (2006a) Simultaneous extraction and determination of anionic surfactants in waters and sediments. J Chromatogr A 1114:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lara-Martín PA, Gómez-Parra A, González-Mazo E (2006b) Development of a method for the simultaneous analysis of anionic and non-ionic surfactants and their carboxylated metabolites in environmental samples by mixed-mode liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1137:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lara-Martín PA, González-Mazo E, Brownawell BJ (2011) Multi-residue method for the analysis of synthetic surfactants and their degradation metabolites in aquatic systems by liquid chromatography–time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:4799–4807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leonards P, Eadsforth C, Schowanek D (2013) Monitoring base surfactants—a database specifically for storage of environmental data on surfactants in Europe. Tenside Surfactant Deterg 50:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis MA (1992) The effects of mixtures and other environmental modifying factors on the toxicities of surfactants to freshwater and marine life. Water Res 26:1013–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li XZ, Hao X, Zhu DY (2000) A modified aeration process for promoting nutrient removal using water hyacinth to treat sewage. Environ Technol 21:525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Löfgren S (2001) The chemical effects of deicing salt on soil and stream water of five catchments in Southeast Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:863–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lunar L, Rubio S, Pérez-Bendito D (2004) Differentiation and quantification of linear alkyl benzenesulfonate isomers by liquid chromatography-ion-trap mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1031:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matthijs E, Debaere G, Itrich N, Masscheleyn P, Rottiers A, Stalmans M, Federle T (1995) The fate of detergent surfactants in sewer systems. Water Sci Technol 31:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mortensen GK, Egsgaard H, Ambus P, Jensen ES, Gron C (2001) Influence of plant growth on degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in sludge-amended soil. J Environ Qual 30:1266–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mungray AK, Kumar P (2008) Anionic surfactants in treated sewage and sludges: risk assessment to aquatic and terrestrial environments. Bioresour Technol 99:2919–2929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Okbah MA, Ibrahim AMA, Gamal MNM (2013) Environmental monitoring of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates and physicochemical characteristics of seawater in El-Mex Bay (Alexandria, Egypt). Environ Monit Assess 185:3103–3115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliver-Rodrıguez B, Zafra-Gomez A, Camino-Sanchez FJ, CondeGonzalez JE, Perez-Trujillo JP, Vılchez JL (2013) Multi-residue method for the analysis of commonly used commercial surfactants, homologues and ethoxymers, in marine sediments by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. Microchem J 110:158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olkowska E, Ruman M, Polkowska Z (2014) Occurrence of surface active agents in the environment. J Anal Methods Chem 2014:1–15Google Scholar
  39. Poudel DD, Lee T, Srinivasan R, Abbaspour K, Jeong CY (2013) Assessment of seasonal and spatial variation of surface water quality, identification of factors associated with water quality variability, and the modeling of critical nonpoint source pollution areas in an agricultural watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 68:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosivall L, MirzaHosseini, S (1990) Water and ion balance and imbalance. Physiology and Maintenance. UNESCO EOLSSGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruan T, Song S, Wang T, Liu R, Lin Y, Jiang G (2014) Identification and composition of emerging quaternary ammonium compounds in municipal sewage sludge in China. Environ Sci Technol 48:4289–4297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott MJ, Jones MN (2000) The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1508:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SETAC (2004) Technical issue paper: whole effluent toxicity testing: ion imbalance. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, PensacolaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharma R, Sikka J, Bajpai N, Waghela D (2012) Impact of domestic sewage and industrial effluent on water quality of the Khan River, Indore (India). Pollut Res 31:289–296Google Scholar
  45. Sibila MA, Garrido MC, Perales JA, Quiroga JM (2008) Ecotoxicity and biodegradability of an alkyl ethoxysulphate surfactant in coastal waters. Sci Total Environ 394:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sjogaard KS, Treusch AH, Valdemarsen TB (2016) Carbon degradation in natural soils flooded with seawater after managed coastal realignmemt. Biogeosci Discuss 1:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sooknah RD, Wilkie AC (2004) Nutrient removal by floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecol Eng 22:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sridhar V, Sansone AL, LaMarche J, Dublin T, Lettenmaier D (2004) Prediction of stream temperature in forested watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. TechNavio (2015) Global surfactants market 2015–2019. [cited 2015 October 30]. Available from: http://www.technavio.com/report/globalsurfactants-market-2015-2019
  50. Todd DK (1995) Groundwater hydrology. John Wiley and Sons Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Verge C, Moreno A, Bravo J, Berna JL (2001) Influence of water hardness on the bioavailability and toxicity of linerar alkylbenzenesulphonate (LAS). Chem Aust 44:1749–1757Google Scholar
  52. Wang Z, Xiao B, Wu X, Tu X, Wang Y, Sun X, Song L (2010) Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in water of Lake Dianchi—spatial and seasonal variation, and kinetics of biodegradation. Environ Monit Assess 171:501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wangkarn S, Soisungnoen P, Rayanakorn M, Grudpan K (2005) Determination of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in water samples by liquid chromatography–UV detection and confirmation by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Talanta 67:686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ying GG (2006) Fate, behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environ Int 32:417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subha Sasi
    • 1
  • Manoj P. Rayaroth
    • 2
  • Charuvila T. Aravindakumar
    • 2
    • 3
  • Usha K. Aravind
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Advanced Centre of Environmental Studies and Sustainable DevelopmentMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia
  3. 3.Inter University Instrumentation CentreMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia
  4. 4.Centre for Environment Education and TechnologyMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations