Skip to main content
Log in

A robust multi-objective bargaining methodology for inter-basin water resource allocation: a case study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new methodology is proposed to balance environmental and economic issues in water allocation under uncertainty. Two objective functions, including maximizing economic income (EI) and minimizing environmental pollution (EP), were considered as two groups of players to construct a deterministic multi-objective bargaining methodology (DMOBM). In the next step, it is enhanced to a robust multi-objective bargaining methodology (RMOBM), which is capable of incorporating the main uncertainties exist in the problem. A large-scale inter-basin water transfer case study was utilized to investigate the applicability of the developed model. The outputs of the models showed that Nash equilibrium provide a rather narrow range of solutions. According to the results, the required rounds to reach Nash equilibrium raised as the uncertainty level increased. In addition, higher levels of uncertainty lead to higher reduction in water allocating of receiving basin. Sensitivity analysis showed that economic income values are less sensitive to changes of uncertain parameters than the environmental objective function. The developed methodology could provide a framework to incorporate the behavior of different stakeholders. Furthermore, the proposed method can be reliable under the condition of facing water allocation uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper Res Lett 25:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Marchiori C, Sgobbi A (2007) Negotiating on water: insights from non-cooperative bargaining theory. Environ Dev Econ 12:329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Huang G, Li Y, Zhou Y (2013) A robust risk analysis method for water resources allocation under uncertainty. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27:713–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung G, Lansey K, Bayraksan G (2009) Reliable water supply system design under uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 24:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila E, Chang N-B, Diwakaruni S (2005) Landfill space consumption dynamics in the Lower Rio Grande Valley by grey integer programming-based games. J Environ Manag 75:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper AJ, Jenkins MW, Kirby KW, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2003) Economic-engineering optimization for California water management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X (2002) Multiobjective combinatorial optimization—theory, methodology, and applications. In: Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X (eds) Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys. Springer US, Boston, pp 369–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48107-3_8

    Google Scholar 

  • Escudero L (2000) WARSYP: a robust modeling approach for water resources system planning under uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 95:313–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons R (1997) An introduction to applicable game theory. J Econ Perspect 11:127–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Housh M, Ostfeld A, Shamir U (2011) Optimal multiyear management of a water supply system under uncertainty: robust counterpart approach. Water Resour Res 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010596

  • Jafarzadegan K, Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2014) A stochastic model for optimal operation of inter-basin water allocation systems: a case study. Stoch Env Res Risk A 28:1343–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y, Culver TB (2006) Robust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations. Water Resour Res 42. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004079

  • Kang D, Lansey K (2012) Scenario-based robust optimization of regional water and wastewater infrastructure. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Mojahedi SA, Ahmadi A (2009) Interbasin water transfer: economic water quality-based model. J Irrig Drain Eng 136:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-S (2012) Multi-objective game-theory models for conflict analysis in reservoir watershed management. Chemosphere 87:608–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manshadi HD, Niksokhan MH, Ardestani M (2015) A quantity-quality model for inter-basin water transfer system using game theoretic and virtual water approaches. Water Resour Manag 29:4573–4588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matete M, Hassan R (2005) An ecological economics framework for assessing environmental flows: the case of inter-basin water transfers in Lesotho. Glob Planet Chang 47:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallottino S, Sechi GM, Zuddas P (2005) A DSS for water resources management under uncertainty by scenario analysis. Environ Model Softw 20:1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabouni MS, Mardani M (2013) Application of robust optimization approach for agricultural water resource management under uncertainty. J Irrig Drain Eng 139:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh M, Mahjouri N, Kerachian R (2010) Optimal inter-basin water allocation using crisp and fuzzy Shapley games. Water Resour Manag 24:2291–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üçler N, Engin GO, Köçken H, Öncel M (2015) Game theory and fuzzy programming approaches for bi-objective optimization of reservoir watershed management: a case study in Namazgah reservoir. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6546–6558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Water Resource Council (1973) Principles and standards for planning water and related land resources. In: Federal Register, vol 38. vol 174. USA, p 24778

  • Watkins DW, McKinney DC (1997) Finding robust solutions to water resources problems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:1(49)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei S, Yang H, Abbaspour K, Mousavi J, Gnauck A (2010) Game theory based models to analyze water conflicts in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Water Res 44:2499–2516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safar Marofi.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasiri-Gheidari, O., Marofi, S. & Adabi, F. A robust multi-objective bargaining methodology for inter-basin water resource allocation: a case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 2726–2737 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0527-8

Keywords

Navigation