Sensor manufacturer, temperature, and cyanobacteria morphology affect phycocyanin fluorescence measurements
- 560 Downloads
Sensors to measure phycocyanin fluorescence in situ are becoming widely used as they may provide useful proxies for cyanobacterial biomass. In this study, we assessed five phycocyanin sensors from three different manufacturers. A combination of culture-based experiments and a 30–sample field study was used to examine the effect of temperature and cyanobacteria morphology on phycocyanin fluorescence. Phycocyanin fluorescence increased with decrease in temperature, although this varied with manufacturer and cyanobacterial density. Phycocyanin fluorescence and cyanobacterial biovolume were strongly correlated (R 2 > 0.83, P < 0.05) for single-celled and filamentous species. The relationship was generally weak for a colonial strain of Microcystis aeruginosa. The colonial culture was divided into different colony size classes and phycocyanin measured before and after manual disaggregation. No differences were measured, and the observation that fluorescence spiked when large colonial aggregates drifted past the light source suggests that sample heterogeneity, rather than lack of light penetration into the colonies, was the main cause of the poor relationship. Analysis of field samples showed a strong relationship between in situ phycocyanin fluorescence and spectrophotometrically measured phycocyanin (R 2 > 0.7, P < 0.001). However, there was only a weak relationship between phycocyanin fluorescence and cyanobacterial biovolume for two sensors (R 2 = 0.22–0.29, P < 0.001) and a non-significant relationship for the third sensor (R 2 = 0.29, P > 0.4). The five sensors tested in our study differed in their output of phycocyanin fluorescence, upper working limits (1200 to > 12,000 μg/L), and responses to temperature, highlighting the need for comprehensive sensor calibration and knowledge on the limitations of specific sensors prior to deployment.
KeywordsAphanizomenon Cyanobacterial blooms Environmental monitoring Dolichospermum Microcystis Nodularia
The authors thank Hugo Borges, Konstanze Steiner, and Oonagh Daly for their assistance in the field and Andrew Mahon and Marc Jary (Cawthron Institute) for technical support.
This research was supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (UOWX1503; Enhancing the health and resilience of New Zealand lakes) and the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand (12-UOW-087; Toxic in crowds). CMH was funded by a Waikato University Masters Scholarship.
- Ahn C, Joung S, Oh H (2007) Alternative alert system for cyanobacterial bloom, using phycocyanin level as a determinant. J Microbiol 45:98–104Google Scholar
- Bowling L, Ryan D, Holliday J, Honeyman G (2012) Evaluation of in situ fluorometry to determine cyanobacterial abundance in the Murray and Lower Darling Rivers, Australia. River Res Appl 29:1059–1071Google Scholar
- Fallon RD, Brock TD (1979) Lytic organisms and photooxidative effects: influence on blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:499–505Google Scholar
- Guibalt GG (1990) General aspects of luminescence spectroscopy. In: Guibalt GG (ed) Practical Fluorescence, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton DP, Carey CC, Arvola L, Arzberger P, Brewer C, Cole JJ, Gaiser E, Hanson PC, Ibelings BW, Jennings E, Kratz TK, Lin F-P, McBride CG, de Motta MD, Muraoka K, Nishri A, Qin B, Read JS, Rose KC, Ryder E, Weathers KC, Zhu G, Trolle D, Brookes JD (2014) A global lake ecological observatory network (GLEON) for synthesising high-frequency sensor data for validation of deterministic ecological models. Inland Waters 5:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hötzel G, Croome R (1999) A phytoplankton methods manual for Australian freshwaters. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 22/99. Land and Water Research and Development Corporation: CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Kasinak JE, Holt BM, Chislock MF, Wilson AE (2015) Benchtop fluorometry of phycocyanin as a rapid approach for estimating cyanobacterial biovolume. J Plankton Res 37:248–257Google Scholar
- Olenina I, Hadju S, Edler L, Anderson S, Wasmund N, Busch S, Gobel J, Gromisz S, Huseby S, Huttunen M, Jaanus A, Kokkonen P, Ledaine I, Niemkiewicz E (2006) Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. HELCOM Balt Sea Environ Proc No. 106, pp 144Google Scholar
- Turner Designs (2015) Technical note: an introduction to fluorescence measurements. Retrieved from http://www.turnerdesigns.com
- Wood SA, Hamilton DP, Paul WJ, Safi KA, Williamson WM (2009) New Zealand guidelines for managing cyanobacteria in recreational fresh waters—interim guidelines. Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar