Abstract
Delayed sowing of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in cotton-based system reduces the productivity and profitability of the cotton-wheat cropping system. In this scenario, relay cropping of wheat in standing cotton might be a viable option to ensure the timely wheat sowing with simultaneous improvement in wheat yields and system profitability. This 2-year study (2012–2013 and 2013–2014) aimed to evaluate the influence of sowing dates and relay cropping combined with different management techniques of cotton sticks on the wheat yield, soil physical properties, and the profitability of the cotton-wheat system. The experiment consisted of five treatments viz. (S1) sowing of wheat at the 7th of November by conventional tillage (two disc harrows + one rotavator + two plankings) after the removal of cotton sticks, (S2) sowing of wheat at the 7th of November by conventional tillage (two disc harrows + two plankings) after the incorporation of cotton sticks in the field with a rotavator, (S3) sowing of wheat at the 7th of November as relay crop in standing cotton with broadcast method, (S4) sowing of wheat at the 15th of December by conventional tillage (two disc harrows + one rotavator + two plankings) after the removal of cotton sticks, and (S5) sowing of wheat at the 15th of December by conventional tillage (two disc harrows + two plankings) after the incorporation of cotton sticks in the field with a rotavator. The highest seed cotton yield was observed in the S5 treatment which was statistically similar with the S3 and S4 treatments; seed cotton yield in the S1 and S2 treatments has been the lowest in both years of experimentation. However, the S2 treatment produced substantially higher root length, biological yield, and grain yield of wheat than the other treatments. The lower soil bulk density at 0–10-cm depth was recorded in the S2 treatment which was statistically similar with the S5 treatment during both years of experimentation. The volumetric water contents, net benefit, and benefit-cost ratio were the highest in the S3 treatment during both years of experimentation. Thus, relay cropping of wheat in standing cotton might be a viable option to improve the soil physical environment and profitability of the cotton-wheat cropping system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez R, Steinbach H (2009) A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil Tillage Res 104:1–15
Amrawat T, Solanki NS, Sharma SK, Jajoria DK, Dotaniya ML (2013) Phenology growth and yield of wheat in relation to agrometeorological indices under different sowing dates. African. J Agric Res 8:6366–6374
Beulter AN, Centurion JF (2004) Effect of soil compaction in root development and in soybean yield. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 39:581–588
Bradford KJ (1986) Manipulation of seed water relations via osmotic priming to improve germination under stress conditions. Hort Sci 21:1105–1112
Buttar G, Sidhu H, Singh V, Jat M, Gupta R, Singh Y, Singh B (2013) Relay planting of wheat in cotton: an innovative technology for enhancing productivity and profitability of wheat in cotton–wheat production system of South Asia. Exp Agric 49:19–30
Erenstein O, Sayre K, Wall P, Dixon J, Hellin J (2008) Adapting no-tillage agriculture to the conditions of smallholder maize and wheat farmers in the tropics and sub-tropics. In: No-till farming systems. World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWC), Bangkok, pp 253–278
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2004) Agro-ecological zones and crop production regions. Available online at http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5460e/y5460e06.htm#TopOfPage (accessed on Septermber 24, 2017)
Farooq M, Nawaz A (2014) Weed dynamics and productivity of wheat in conventional and conservation rice-based cropping systems. Soil Tillage Res 141:1–9
Hameed E, Shah WA, Shad AA, Bakht J, Muhammad T (2003) Effect of different planting dates, seed rate and nitrogen levels on wheat. Asian J Plant Sci 2(6):467–474
Hussain N, Hassan G, Ghafoor A, Sarwar G (1998) Bio-amelioration of sandy clay loam saline sodic soil. In: Proc. 6th Intl. Micro-Irrigation Congress, Florida, pp 293–298
Hussain S, Sajjad A, Hussain MI, Saleem M (2001) Growth and yield response of three wheat varieties to different seeding densities. Int J Agric Biol 3:228–229
Khan MB, Khaliq A (2005) Production of winter cereals as relay crops by surface seeding in cotton based cropping system. J Res Sci 16:79–86
Kumar P, Dey MM (2007) Long-term changes in Indian food basket and nutrition. Econ Polit Week 42(35):3567–3572
Lowery B, Hickey WJ, Arshad M, Lal R (1996) Soil water parameters and soil quality methods for assessing soil quality. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c8. pp. 143-155
Ma XM, Liu XX, Zhang QW, Zhao JZ, Cai QN, Ma YA, Chen DM (2006) Assessment of cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii, and their natural enemies on aphid-resistant and aphid-susceptible wheat varieties in a wheat–cotton relay intercropping system. Ento Eperi et Appl 121:235–241
McCool D, Pannkuk C, Kennedy A, Fletcher P (2008) Effects of burn/low-till on erosion and soil quality. Soil Tillage Res 101:2–9
Nasrullah M, Cheema S, Akhtar M (2010) Efficacy of different dry sowing methods to enhance wheat yield under cotton-wheat cropping system. Crop Environ 1:27–30
Nawaz F, Ashraf MY, Ahmad R, Waraich E.A (2013) Selenium (Se) seed priming induced growth and biochemical changes in wheat under water deficit conditions. Biol Trace Elem Res 151:284–293
Nawaz A, Farooq M, Lal R, Rehman A, Hussain T, Nadeem A (2016) Influence of Sesbania brown manuring and rice residue mulch on soil health, weeds and system productivity of conservation rice–wheat systems. Land Degrad Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2578
Nawaz A, Farooq M, Lal R, Rehman A, Rehman H (2017) Comparison of conventional and conservation rice-wheat systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Soil Tillage Res 169:35–43
Nelson R, Kokic P, Elliston L, King J-A (2005) Structural adjustment: a vulnerability index for Australian broadacre agriculture. Aust Commod Fore Issu 12:171
Osunbitan J, Oyedele D, Adekalu K (2005) Tillage effects on bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and strength of a loamy sand soil in southwestern Nigeria. Soil Tillage Res 82:57–64
Rashidi M, Keshavarzpour F (2008) Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon (Cucumis melo). ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 3:41–46
Shah MA, Farooq M, Hussain M (2016) Productivity and profitability of cotton–wheat system as influenced by relay intercropping of insect resistant transgenic cotton in bed planted wheat. Eur J Agron 75:33–41
Stapper M, Fischer R (1990) Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust J Agric Res 41:1021–1041
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA (1996) Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometric approach, third edn. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York
Strudley MW, Green TR, Ascough JC (2008) Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: state of the science. Soil Tillage Res 99:4–48
Tennant D (1975) A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63:995–1001
Ugarte C, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (2007) Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crops Res 100:240–248
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for the financial support for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sajjad, A., Anjum, S.A., Ahmad, R. et al. Relay cropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) improves the profitability of cotton-wheat cropping system in Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 782–789 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0422-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0422-3