Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 1448–1459 | Cite as

Release of particles, organic compounds, and metals from crumb rubber used in synthetic turf under chemical and physical stress

  • Silvia CanepariEmail author
  • Paola Castellano
  • Maria Luisa Astolfi
  • Stefano Materazzi
  • Riccardo Ferrante
  • Dennis Fiorini
  • Roberta Curini
Research Article

Abstract

The chemical and morphological characteristics of materials released under chemical and physical stress by different rubber granulates used as infill materials in synthetic turf (recycled scrap tires, natural rubber, and a new-generation thermoplastic elastomer) were compared.

The headspace solid-phase micro-extraction GC-MS analysis evidenced that at 70 °C natural rubber and thermoplastic elastomer release amounts of organic species much higher than recycled scrap tires. In particular, the desorption of mineral oils, with a prevalence of toxicologically relevant low-viscosity alkanes in the range C17–C22, and plasticizers (diisobutyl phthalate) was clearly evidenced. The new-generation thermoplastic elastomer material also releases butylated hydroxytoluene.

In slightly acidic conditions, quite high amounts of bio-accessible Zn, Cu, and Co are released from recycled scrap tires, while natural rubber releases mainly Se and Tl. In contrast, the thermoplastic elastomer does not contain significant concentrations of leachable heavy metals.

The formation of small particles, also in the inhalable fraction, was evidenced by electron microscopy after mechanical or thermal treatment of natural rubber.

Keywords

Synthetic turf Crumb rubber Semi-volatile organic compounds Headspace solid-phase micro-extraction GC-MS Bio-accessible fraction of elements Inhalable particles 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention, contract n. Prot. AOO-20/0001902/09. Dr. Angelo Marini is gratefully acknowledged for his valuable collaboration. Authors gratefully acknowledge Golden Plast S.p.A. (Potenza Picena, Italy) for providing the TPE new-generation material.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_377_MOESM1_ESM.docx (249 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 248 kb)

References

  1. Benjamin TB, Ellis AT (1966) The collapse of cavitation bubbles and the pressures thereby produced against solid boundaries. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 260:221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkholz DA, Belton KL, Guidotti TL (2003) Toxicological evaluation for the hazard assessment of tire crumb for use in public playgrounds. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:903–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bocca B, Forte G, Petrucci F, Costantini S, Izzo P (2009) Metals contained and leached from rubber granulates used in synthetic turf areas. Sci Total Environ 407:2183–2190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camel V (2001) Recent extraction techniques for solid matrices—supercritical fluid extraction, pressurized fluid extraction and microwave-assisted extraction: their potential and pitfalls. Analyst 126:1182–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canepari S, Astolfi ML, Moretti S, Curini R (2010) Comparison of extracting solutions for elemental fractionation in airborne particulate matter. Talanta 82:834–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canepari S, Cardarelli E, Ghighi S, Scimonelli L (2005) Ultrasound and microwave-assisted extraction of metals from sediment: a comparison with the BCR procedure. Talanta 66:1122–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canepari S, Cardarelli E, Giuliano A, Pietrodangelo A (2006) Determination of metals, metalloids and non-volatile ions in airborne particulate matter by a new two-step sequential leaching procedure. Part A: Experimental design and optimization. Talanta 69:581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canepari S, Padella F, Astolfi ML, Marconi E, Perrino C (2013) Elemental concentration in atmospheric particulate matter: estimation of nanoparticle contribution. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1619–1629Google Scholar
  9. Canepari S, Perrino C, Olivieri F, Astolfi ML (2008) Characterisation of the traffic sources of PM through size-segregated sampling, sequential leaching and ICP analysis. Atmos Environ 42:8161–8175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng H, Hu Y, Reinhard M (2014) Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review. Environ Sci Technol 48:2114–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claudio L (2008) Synthetic turf: health debate takes root. Environ Health Perspect 116:A116–A122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Souza-Barboza JC, Pétrier C, Luche JL (1988) Ultrasound in organic synthesis. Some fundamental aspects of the sonochemical Barbier reaction. J Org Chem 53:1212–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2012) Scientific opinion on mineral oil hydrocarbons in food. EFSA J 10(6):2704 1–185. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2704.htm Google Scholar
  14. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) US (2009) A scoping-level field monitoring study of synthetic turf fields and playgrounds. EPA/600/R-09/135Google Scholar
  15. Fiorini D, Fiselier K, Biedermann M, Ballini R, Coni E, Grob K (2008) Contamination of grape seed oils with mineral oil paraffins. J Agric Food Chem 56:11245–11250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiorini D, Paciaroni A, Gigli F, Ballini R (2010) A versatile splitless injection GC-FID method for the determination of mineral oil paraffins in vegetable oils and dried fruit. Food Control 21:1155–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ginsberg G, Toal B, Simcox N, Bracker A, Golembiewski B, Kurland T, Hedman C (2011) Human health risk assessment of synthetic turf fields based upon investigation of five fields in Connecticut. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 74:1150–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomes J, Mota H, Bordado J, Cadete M, Sarmento G, Ribeiro A, Baiao M, Fernandes J, Pampulim V, Custódio M, Veloso I (2010) Toxicological assessment of coated versus uncoated rubber granulates obtained from used tires for use in sport facilities. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60:741–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IUPAC, Analytical Chemistry Division (1978) Nomenclature, symbol, units and their usage in spectrochemical analysis. II. Data interpretation. Spectrochim Acta B 33(6):241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives) (1995) Summary of evaluations performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jeceval/jec_1655.htm
  21. Kim S, Yang JY, Kim HH, Yeo IY, Shin DC, Lim YW (2012) Health risk assessment of lead ingestion exposure by particle sizes in crumb rubber on artificial turf considering bioavailability. Environ Health Toxicol 27:1–10Google Scholar
  22. Kreider ML, Panko PJ, McAtee BL, Sweet LI, Finley BL (2010) Physical and chemical characterization of tire-related particles: comparison of particles generated using different methodologies. Sci Total Environ 408:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krüger O, Kalbe U, Berger W, Nordhau K, Christoph G, Walzel H-P (2012) Comparison of batch and column tests for the elution of artificial turf system components. Environ Sci Technol 46:13085–13092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krüger O, Kalbe U, Richter E, Egeler P, Römbke J, Berger W (2013) New approach to the ecotoxicological risk assessment of artificial outdoor sporting grounds. Environ Pollut 175:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwon E, Castaldi MJ (2009) Fundamental understanding of the thermal degradation mechanisms of waste tires and their air pollutant generation in a N2. Atmos Environ Sci Technol 43:5996–6002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauterborn W, Hentschel W (1985) Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one. Ultrasonics 23:260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li X, Berger W, Musante C, Mattina MI (2010) Characterization of substances released from crumb rubber material used on artificial turf fields. Chemosphere 80:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Llompart M, Sanchez-Prado L, Lamas JP, Garcia-Jares C, Roca E, Dagnac T (2013) Hazardous organic chemicals in rubber recycled tire playgrounds and pavers. Chemosphere 90:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neukom HP, Grob K, Biedermann M, Noti A (2002) Food contamination by C20–C50 mineral paraffins from the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 36:4839–4847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pavilonis BT, Weisel CP, Buckley B, Lioy PJ (2014) Bioaccessibility and risk exposure to metals and SVOCs in artificial turf field fill materials and fibers. Risk Anal 34(1):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perrino C, Marconi E, Tofful L, Farao C, Materazzi S, Canepari S (2012) Thermal stability of inorganic and organic compounds in atmospheric particulate matter. Atmos Environ 54:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Preece CM, Hansson I (1981) A metallurgical approach to cavitation erosion. Adv Mech Phy Surf 1:199–253Google Scholar
  33. Quek A, Balasubramanian R (2009) An algorithm for the kinetics of tire pyrolysis under different heating rates. J Hazard Mater 166:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodgers B, Waddell W (2013) The science of rubber compounding. In: Mark JE, Herman B, Roland CM (eds) The science and technology of rubber, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 417–470Google Scholar
  35. Ruffino B, Fiore S, Zanetti MC (2013) Environmental-sanitary risk analysis procedure applied to artificial turf sports fields. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:4980–4992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sadiktsis I, Bergvall C, Johansson C, Westerholm R (2012) Automobile tires—a potential source of highly carcinogenic dibenzopyrenes to the environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:3326–3334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schilirò T, Traversi D, Degan R, Pignata C, Alessandria L, Scozia D, Bono R, Gilli G (2013) Artificial turf football fields: environmental and mutagenicity assessment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Serensits TJ, McNitt AS, Petrunak DM (2011) Human health issues on synthetic turf in the USA. Proc IMechE J Sports Eng Technol Part P 225:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simcox NJ, Bracker A, Ginsberg G, Toal B, Golembiewski B, Kurland T, Hedman C (2011) Synthetic turf field investigation in Connecticut. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 74:1133–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simon R (2010) Review of the impacts of crumb rubber in artificial turf applications. Prepared for the Corporation for Manufacturing Excellence (Manex) and by University of California, Berkeley laboratory for manufacturing and sustainability, 1–59Google Scholar
  41. Smolders E, Degryse F (2002) Fate and effect of zinc from tire debris in soil. Environ Sci Technol 36:3706–3710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suslick KS, Doktycz SJ (1989) The sonochemistry of Zn powder. J Am Chem Soc 111:2342–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Rooij JGM, Jongeneelen FJ (2010) Hydroxypyrene in urine of football players after playing on artificial sports field with tire crumb infill. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Ulirsch G, Gleason K, Gerstenberger S, Moffett DB, Pulliam G, Ahmed T, Fagliano J (2010) Evaluating and regulating lead in synthetic turf. Environ Health Perspect 118–10:1345–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verschoor AJ (2007) Leaching of zinc from rubber infill on artificial turf (football pitches). RIVM report 601774001/2007Google Scholar
  46. Whitlock CEA (2008) Review of synthetic turf safety. Somerset Hills School District, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  47. Wik A, Dave G (2009) Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment—a critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environ Pollut 157:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang JJ, Han IK, Zhang L, Crain W (2008) Hazardous chemicals in synthetic turf materials and their bioaccessibility in digestive fluids. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18:600–607Google Scholar
  49. Zhang SL, Xin ZX, Zhang ZX, Kim JK (2009) Characterization of the properties of thermoplastic elastomers containing waste rubber tire powder. Waste Manag 29:1480–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Local Office of AostaINAIL-Italian Workers’ Compensation AuthorityAostaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Occupational HygieneINAIL-Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority, Research AreaRomeItaly
  4. 4.Chemistry Division, School of Science and TechnologyUniversity of CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations