Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Artificial wetlands as tools for frog conservation: stability and variability of reproduction characteristics in Sahara frog populations in Tunisian man-made lakes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amphibian populations are in decline principally due to climate change, environmental contaminants, and the reduction in wetlands. Even though data concerning current population trends are scarce, artificial wetlands appear to play a vital role in amphibian conservation. This study concerns the reproductive biology of the Sahara frog over a 2-year period in four Tunisian man-made lakes. Each month, gonad state (parameters: K, GSI, LCI), fecundity, and fertility of females (using 1227 clutches) were evaluated in the field under controlled conditions. Clutches were present for 110–130 days at two of the sites, but only for 60–80 days at the other two. Maximum egg laying occurred in May, corresponding to the highest point in the gonad somatic index. Clutch densities were higher in the smaller lakes. Female fecundity was in relation to body size; mean clutch fecundity attained 1416 eggs, with no differences observed according to site. Egg fertility varied over a 1-year period, with a maximum in May followed by a decrease when water temperature was at its highest. Eggs were smaller at the beginning of spawning; maximum size was in May, which might explain the higher fertility, but no maternal influence was detected. Embryonic development was strictly dependent on temperature. The population at each site appeared as a small patch within a metapopulation in overall good health, as shown by the relative temporal stability in reproduction variables. Constructed wetlands may therefore play an important role in the conservation of amphibians, especially in semi-arid zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amor N, Farjallah S, Said K (2009) Morphometric variation in the Tunisian green frog, Rana saharica (Anura: Ranidae). Afr Zool 44:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Amor N, Velo-Antón G, Farjallah S, Said K (2010) Genetic variation across Tunisian populations of the anuran species Discoglossus pictus and Pelophylax saharicus. Afr Zool 45:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amor N, Kalboussi M, Said K (2013) Conservation status of amphibians in Tunisia. Basic Appl Herpetol 27:85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2012) Evaluation de la vulnérabilité, des impacts du changement climatique et des mesures d'adaptation en Tunisie.www. environnement.gov.tn/fileadmin/medias/pdfs/dgeqv/vulnérabilité_adaptation.pdf

  • Armstrong DP (2005) Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv Biol 19:1402–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen JW, Abrahams C, Meilink WRM, Iosif R, Zuiderwijk A (2017) Amphibian decline, pond loss and reduced population connectivity under agricultural intensification over a 38 year period. Biodivers Conserv 26:1411–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzouzi K, Tekaya S (2005) Oogenesis of Rana saharica in Tunisia: histological study and influence of climatic factors. Rev Soc Sci Nat Tun 31:1–8 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA (2005) The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology. Biol Conserv 125:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beja P, Alcazar R (2003) Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biol Conserv 114:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellakhal M, Fertouna-Bellakhal M, Neveu A, Missaoui H (2010) Food diet of the Sahara Frog Pelophylax saharicus (Boulenger, 1913) in Tunisia. Bull Soc Herp Fr 135–136:33–52 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellakhal M, Neveu A, Aleya L (2014) Artificial wetlands as a solution to the decline in the frog population: Estimation of their suitability through the study of population dynamics of Sahara Frogs in hill lakes. Ecol Eng 63:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Hassine J, De Buffrénil V, Nouira S (2011) First record of morphological abnormalities in natural populations of two amphibians species in Tunisia. J Herpeto 45:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand AB, Snodgrass JW (2009) Value of artificial habitats for amphibian reproduction in altered landscapes. Conserv Biol 24:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Goana P, Ferreras P (2001) Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am Nat 158:277–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson AP, Hudson PJ (1986) Parasites disease and the structure of ecological communities. Trends Ecol Evol 1:11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmhagen B, Angerbjörn A (2001) The applicability of metapopulation theory to large mammals. Oikos 94:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban M, Garcia-Paris M, Buckley D, Castanet J (1999) Bone growth and age in Rana saharica, a water frog living in a desert environment. Ann Zool Fenn:36–62

  • Fahd S, Francisco JM, Mateo JA, Pleguezuelos JM (2003) Amphibians and reptiles in the cross-border territories (Ceuta, Melilla and islets in North Africa). Comments on the biogeography of the group. Rev Esp Herpetol 17:387–388 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Breisch AR (2001) Climate warming and calling phenology of frogs near Ithaca, New York, 1900–1999. Conserv Biol 15:1175–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollmann G, Gollmann B (1994) Offspring size variation in a hybrid zone of Australian frogs (Geocrinia laevis complex, Myobatrachinae). Amphib Rept 15:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CH, Zarnoch SJ, Austin D (2017) Weather, hydroregime, and breeding effort influence juvenile recruitment of anurans: implications for climate change. Ecosphère 8:1789

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Simberloff D (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, London, pp 5–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson L (2003) Why ecology fails at application: should we consider variability more than regularity. Oikos 100:624–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Taylor AD (1997) Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, London, pp 27–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hokit DG, Branch LC (2003) Association between patch area and vital rates: consequences for local and regional populations. Ecol Appl 13:1060–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque Β, Saidapur SΚ (1994) Dynamics of oogenesis in the tropical anuran Rana tigrina (Amphibia: Ranidae) with special reference to vitellogenic cycles in wild-caught and captive frogs. J Biosci 19:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwai N (2017) Estimating tadpole-detection rates using visual field surveys: effects of survey time, tadpole species and tadpole density. Wild Res 44:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PT, Chase JM (2004) Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecol Lett 7:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Drechsler M (2003) Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species. Oikos 103:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jφrgensen CB, Larsen LΟ, Lofts Β (1979) Annual cycles of fat bodies and gonads in the toad Bufo bufo bufo (L), compared with cycles in other temperate zone anurans. Biol Skr 22:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR (1997) Influences of egg laying behaviour on pathogenic infection of amphibian eggs. Conserv Biol 11:214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King EG, Kaplan RH (1997) Estimating ovum size in amphibians: egg size increases differently among species during early development. J Herpetol 31:299–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Richardson WB, Reineke DM, Gray BR, Parmelee JR, Weick SE (2004) Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecol Appl 14:669–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko SK, Kang HM, Im WB, Kwon HB (1998) Testicular cycles in three species of corean frogs: Rana nigromaculata, Rana rugosa and Rana dybowskii. J Zool 111:347–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopolou-Sklavounou P, Loumbournis N (1990) Annual ovarian in the frog Rana ridibunda, in Northern Greece. J Herpetol 24:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulou-Sklavounou P, Kattoulas ME (1990) Contribution to the reproductive biology of Rana ridibunda Pallas (Anura, Ranidae). Amphib Rept 11:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JP (2017) Ineffectiveness of call surveys for estimating population size in a widespread neotropical frog, Oophaga pumilio. J Herpetol 51:52–57

  • Licht Ρ (1984) Reproductive cycles of vertebrates. Reptiles. In: Lamming GΕ (ed) Marshall's physiology of reproduction. Churchill-Livingstone Press, Edingburgh, pp 206–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Loman J (2001) Local variation in Rana temporaria egg and clutch size: adaptations to pond drying. Alytes 19:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RD, Newton B, Sih A (1996) Delayed hatching as a response of stream side salamander eggs to chemical cues from predatory sunfish. Oikos 77:331–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neveu A (2004) The raniculture an alternative to harvesting? Current state in France. Prod Anim 17:167–175 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neveu A (2009) Suitability of European green frogs for intensive culture: comparison between different phenotypes of the esculenta hybridogenetic complex. Aquaculture 295:30–37

  • Percsy C, Percsy N (2002a) Ten years of monitoring of autochthonous populations and allochtonous “green” frogs (Rana (Pelophylax) ssp., Anura, Ranidae) in the Lasne Basin (Wallon Brabant, Belgium). Bull Soc Herp Fr 103:59–72 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Percsy C, Percsy N (2002b) Changes in indigenous and introduced populations of “green” frogs in Wallon Brabant. In: Peeters M, Van Goethem JL (eds) Belgian fauna and alien species, Bull IRSNB Biolo, vol 72, pp 213–218 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafinska A (1991) Reproductive biology of the fire bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegate (Anura: Discoglossidae): egg size, clutch size and larval period length differences. Biol J Linn Soc 43:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RΚ (1976) Seasonal cycle in anuran (Amphibia) testis: the endocrine and environmental controls. Boll Zool 43:151–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RK, Lela L, Delrio G, Di Meglio ΜA, Russo A, Chieffi G (1978) Environmental influence on testicular activity in the green frog Rana esculenta. J Exp Zool 206:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading CJ (1998) The effect of winter temperature on the timing of breeding activity in the common toad, Bufo bufo. Oecol 117:469–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Régnier V (1983) Ecological study of frogs from complex Rana esculenta L. in “Pays de Vilaine” (Britany). Thesis of 3thd cycle, Rennes University (in French)

  • Ruhi A, San Sebastian O, Feo C, Franch M, Gascón S, Richter-Boix À, Boix D, Llorente G (2012) Man-made Mediterranean temporary ponds as a tool for amphibian conservation. Ann Limnol 48:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidapur SΚ (1989) Reproductive cycles of Indian amphibians. In: Saidapur SΚ (ed) Reproductive cycles of Indian vertebrates. Allied Press, New Delhi, pp 166–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt B (2003) Count data, detection probabilities, and the demography, dynamics distribution, and decline of amphibians. C R Biol 326:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmi S, Nasri S (1997) Lakes and hill lakes in Tunisia. Hydromed, report ERBIC18 CT960091, Tunis (in French)

  • Semlitsch RD, Peterman WE, Anderson TL, Drake DL, Ousterhout BH (2015) Intermediate pond sizes contain the highest density, richness, and diversity of pond-breeding amphibians. PLoS One 10:e0123055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shulse CD, Semlitsch RD, Trauth KM, Williams AD (2010) Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on Amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands 30:915–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1998) New parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, New-York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Moore RD (1993) Delayed hatching of salamander eggs in response to enhanced larval predation risk. Am Nat 142:947–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren P (1991) Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biol J Linn Soc 42:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofianidou TS, Kyriakopoulou-Sklavounou P (1983) Studies on the biology of the frog Rana dalmatina, Bonap, during the breeding season in Greece. Amphib Rept 4:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JC, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodriguez ASI, Fischman DI, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions. Sciences 306:1783–1786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Hanski I (1997) Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, London, pp 359–386

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomassone R, Dervin C, Masson JP (1993) Biometry, modelling in biological phenomena. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenham PC, Koenig WD, Mossman MJ, Stark SL, Jaagger LA (2003) Regional dynamics of wetland-breeding frogs and toads: turnover and synchrony. Ecol Appl 13:1522–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiora A, Kyriakopolou-Sklavounou P (2001) Male reproductive cycle of the water frog Rana epeirotica in north western Greece. Amphibia-Reptilia 22:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vad CF, Péntek AL, Cozma NJ, Földi A, Tóth A, Tóth B et al (2017) Wartime scars or reservoirs of biodiversity? The value of bomb crater ponds in aquatic conservation. Biol Conserv 209:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa J (1979) Two fungi lethal to frog eggs in Central America. Cop 4:650–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittier JΜ, Crews D (1987) Seasonal reproduction: patterns and controls. In: Norris DΟ, Jones RΕ (eds) Hormones and reproduction in fishes, amphibians and reptiles. Plenum Press, New York, pp 385–409

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hechmi Missaoui of the National Institute of Agronomy of Tunis for financial support for this study. This study is the result of a collaborative project between the Institut Supérieur de Pêche et d’Aquaculture de Bizerte, the UMR INRA 985, Agrocampus Rennes, and the Chrono-Environment Laboratory, Besançon, UMR CNRS 6249.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotfi Aleya.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellakhal, M., Neveu, A., Fertouna-Bellakhal, M. et al. Artificial wetlands as tools for frog conservation: stability and variability of reproduction characteristics in Sahara frog populations in Tunisian man-made lakes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 26658–26669 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0278-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0278-6

Keywords

Navigation