Abstract
The low ammonium concentration, low temperature, presence of organic matter, and large variation of influent ammonium load pose serious challenges for the application of PN/AMX (partial nitrification-anammox) reactor in the mainstream wastewater treatment. Previous mathematical simulation studies of PN/AMX granule reactor mainly concentrated on the steady-state modeling. The steady-state simulation cannot be used for developing control strategies under dynamic condition. In this study, four control strategies were evaluated on their abilities to minimize the impact of feed disturbances on autotrophic nitrogen removal in mainstream wastewater. The four control strategies included are the following: (A) direct airflow adjustment to maintain the fixed NH4 + set point, (B) fixed NH4 + set point control manipulated by DO concentration with DO limit, (C) constant DO control strategy, and (D) adaptive change of NH4 + set point control based on the feed disturbance (NH4 + set point value achieved by DO concentration manipulation with DO limit). The results indicated that the control strategy A successfully implemented for high NH4 + strength wastewater treatment cannot be directly transferred into the mainstream wastewater treatment, in which high NO2 − accumulation was resulted during the NH4 + peaks at the low-temperature period. Satisfactory TN removal could be achieved by maintaining either fixed or variable bulk NH4 + set point values calculated based on the feed disturbances (control strategies B and D). The DO limit imposed on the DO concentration manipulation to derive the desired NH4 + set point values was essential for the successful implementation of control strategies B and D. The control strategy C with constant DO concentration was not feasible for the PN/AMX process under dynamic feed disturbances. The control simulation results and the control variable sensitivity analysis indicated that the NH4 + concentration was a better control variable than the DO concentration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abma WR, Driessen W, Haarhuis R, van Loosdrecht MC (2010) Upgrading of sewage treatment plant by sustainable and cost-effective separate treatment of industrial wastewater. Water Sci Technol 61(7):1715–1722
Alex J, Benedetti L, Copp JB, Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Nopens I, Pons MN, Rieger L, Rosen C and Steyer JP (2008) Benchmark simulation. Model no. 1 (BSM1), IWA task group on benchmarking of control strategies for WWTPs. Tech Rep
Cao Y, van Loosdrecht MCM, Daigger GT (2017) Mainstream partial nitritation–anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(4):1365–1383
Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problem. Clarendon Press, New York
Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Vanrolleghem PA, Copp JB (2014) Benchmarking of control strategies for wastewater treatment plants. IWA Publishing, London
Hao X, Heijnen JJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2002) Model-based evaluation of temperature and inflow variations on a partial nitrification-ANAMMOX biofilm process. Water Res 36(19):4839–4849
Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London
Jetten MSM, Horn SJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (1997) Towards a more sustainable municipal wastewater treatment system. Water Sci Technol 35(9):171–180
Joss A, Derlon N, Cyprien C, Burger S, Szivak I, Traber J, Siegrist H, Morgenroth E (2011) Combined nitritation–anammox: advances in understanding process stability. Environ Sci Technol 45(22):9735–9742
Kartal B, Kuenen JG, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Sewage treatment with anammox. Science 328(5979):702–703
Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, Joss A, Horn H, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences—an application survey. Water Res 55:292–303
Laureni M, Weissbrodt DG, Szivák I, Robin O, Nielsen JL, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2015) Activity and growth of anammox biomass on aerobically pre-treated municipal wastewater. Water Res 80:325–336
Laureni M, Falås P, Robin O, Wick A, Weissbrodt DG, Nielsen JL, Ternes TA, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2016) Mainstream partial nitritation and anammox: long-term process stability and effluent quality at low temperatures. Water Res 101:628–639
Lee MW, Park JM (2007) One-dimensional mixed-culture biofilm model considering different space occupancies of particulate components. Water Res 41(19):4317–4328
Li X, Sun S, Badgley BD, Sung S, Zhang H, He Z (2016) Nitrogen removal by granular nitritation-anammox in an upflow membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Water Res 94:23–31
Liu W, Yang D, Chen W, Gu X (2017) High-throughput sequencing-based microbial characterization of size fractionated biomass in an anoxic anammox reactor for low-strength wastewater at low temperatures. Bioresour Technol 231:45–52
Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, Hu Z, Kartal B, Jetten MSM, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Simultaneous partial nitritation and anammox at low temperature with granular sludge. Water Res 66:111–121
Mauricio-Iglesias M, Vangsgaard AK, Gernaey KV, Smets BF, Sin G (2015) A novel control strategy for single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal in SBR. Chem Eng J 260:64–73
Metcalf and Eddy (2002) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill
Ni B-J, Chen Y-P, Liu S-Y, Fang F, Xie W-M, Yu H-Q (2009) Modeling a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) process. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(3):490–499
Perez J, Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Outcompeting nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in single-stage nitrogen removal in sewage treatment plants: a model-based study. Water Res 66:208–218
Reino C, Carrera J (2017) Low-strength wastewater treatment in an anammox UASB reactor: effect of the liquid upflow velocity. Chem Eng J 313:217–225
Siegrist H, Salzgeber D, Eugster J, Joss A (2008) Anammox brings WWTP closer to energy autarky due to increased biogas production and reduced aeration energy for N-removal. Water Sci Technol 57(3):383–388
Sliekers AO, Derwort N, Gomez JLC, Strous M, Kuenen JG, Jetten MSM (2002) Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor. Water Res 36(10):2475–2482
Smitshuijzen J, Pérez J, Duin O, Loosdrecht MCMV (2016) A simple model to describe the performance of highly-loaded aerobic COD removal reactors. Biochem Eng J 112:94–102
van Dongen U, Jetten MS, van Loosdrecht MC (2001) The SHARON-anammox process for treatment of ammonium rich wastewater. Water Sci Technol 44(1):153–160
Van Hulle SWH, Vandeweyer HJP, Meesschaert BD, Vanrolleghem PA, Dejans P, Dumoulin A (2010) Engineering aspects and practical application of autotrophic nitrogen removal from nitrogen rich streams. Chem Eng J 162(1):1–20
Vangsgaard AK, Mauricio-Iglesias M, Gernaey KV, Sin G (2014) Development of novel control strategies for single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal: a process oriented approach. Comput Chem Eng 66:71–81
Wanner O, Gujer W (1986) A multispecies biofilm model. Biotechnol Bioeng 28(3):314–328
Wanner O, Reichert P (1996) Mathematical modeling of mixed-culture biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 49(2):172–184
Wett B (2006) Solved upscaling problems for implementing deammonification of rejection water. Water Sci Technol 53(12):121–128
Acknowledgements
J. Wu acknowledges the high-end talent program provided by Yangzhou University, China.
Funding
The study is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 51478410).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Bingcai Pan
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 106 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J. Comparison of control strategies for single-stage partial nitrification-anammox granular sludge reactor for mainstream sewage treatment—a model-based evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 25839–25848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0230-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0230-9