Abstract
In light of a slow buildup in CO2 emissions since the recovery, this paper revisits the relationship between CO2 emissions and the US economy using a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model, in which the determinants are identified through an expanded real business cycle model. We find convincing evidence that CO2 emissions decline more rapidly during recessions than increase during expansions over the long run. Of all determinants considered, long-run asymmetry is fostered once vehicle miles traveled is controlled. This calls for a greater attention to public transportation development and vehicle miles traveled tax for slowing down stock buildup of CO2 emissions during good times.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166
Andrews D (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61:821–856
Andrews D, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62:1383–1414
Avner PJ, Rentschler E, and Hallegatte S (2014) Carbon price efficiency: Lock-in and path dependence in urban forms and transport infrastructure. Policy Research Working Paper 6941, World Bank, Washington, DC
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Galbraith JW, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegreation in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283
Burke PJ, Shahiduzzaman M, Stern DI (2015) Carbon dioxide emissions in the short run: The rate and sources of economic growth matter. Glob Environ Chang 33:109–121
CEA (2013) The Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers, Council of Economic Advisers, p.p. 195–201
Coers R, Sanders M (2013) The energy-GDP nexus; addressing an old question with new methods. Energy Econ 36:708–715
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Lit 42:7–71
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time-series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431
Doda B (2014) Evidence on business cycles and CO2 emissions. J Macroecon 40:214–227
Doda B (2013) Emission-GDP relationship in times of growth and decline. CCCEP Working Paper No. 136, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy
Fay M, Hallegatte S, Vogt-Schilb A, Rozenberg J, Narloch U, Kerr T (2015) Decarbonizing development: three steps to a zero-carbon future. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 104–108
Fisher C, Heutel G (2013) Environmental macroeconomics: environmental policy, business cycles, and directed technical change. Ann Rev Resour Econ 5:197–210
Greenwood-Nimmo MJ, Shin Y (2013) Taxation and the asymmetric adjustment of selected retail energy prices in the UK. Econ Lett 121(3):411–416
Hansen BE (1997) Approximate asymptotic P-values for structural-change tests. J Bus Econ Stat 15(1):60–67
Heutel G (2012) How should environmental policy respond to business cycles? Optimal policy under persistent productivity shocks. Rev Econ Dyn 15(2):244–264
IEA (2015) Global energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide stalled in 2014. International Energy Agency. Available at http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2015/march/global-energy-related-emissions-of-carbon-dioxide-stalled-in-2014.html
Jaunky VC (2011) The CO2 emission-income nexus: evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy 39:1228–1240
Lee J, Strazicich MC (2003) Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):1082–1089
Narayan PK, Narayan S, Smyth R (2011) Energy consumption at business cycle horizons: The case of the United States. Energy Econ 33:161–167
Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1999) An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom S (ed) Econometrics and economic theory: the Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 371–413
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 26:289–326
Shahiduzzama M, Layton A (2015) Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: a decomposition analysis. Appl Energy 150:25–35
Sheldon TL (2015) Asymmetric effects of the business cycle on carbon dioxide emissions: a new layer of climate change uncertainty. Job Market Paper, University of California, San Diego
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo MJ (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Horrace W, Sickles C, Robin C (eds) Fetschrift in honor of Peter Schemidt. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, pp 281–314
Trembath A, Luke M, and Shellenberger M (2013) Coal killer: How natural gas fuels the clean energy revolution. Breakthrough Institute
York R (2012) Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 2(11):762–764
Acknowledgements
This paper was written when Stockholm China Economic Research Institute (SCERI) hosted the second author as Visiting Research Fellow. He is grateful to SCERI for stimulating research environment and Lars-Erik Thunholms Stiftelse for Vetenskaplig Forskning for the generous stipend. This research is part of a project financially funded by e-Science fund from the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Malaysia (MOSTI) (06-02-11-SF0174). We gratefully thank Matthew Greenwood-Nimmo and Yongcheol Shin for their kindness to share the program code.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eng, YK., Wong, CY. Tapered US carbon emissions during good times: what’s old, what’s new?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 25047–25060 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0144-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0144-6