Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 32, pp 25315–25328 | Cite as

Response of magnetic properties to metal deposition on urban green in Nanjing, China

  • Xiang’zi Leng
  • Cheng Wang
  • Huiming LiEmail author
  • Xin QianEmail author
  • Jinhua Wang
  • Yixuan Sun
Research Article


Environmental magnetism is a simple and fast method that can be used to assess heavy metal pollution in urban areas from the relationships between magnetic properties and heavy metal concentrations. Leaves of Osmanthus fragrans, one of the most widely distributed evergreen trees in Nanjing, China, were collected from four different district types, i.e., residential, educational, traffic, and industrial. The magnetic properties and heavy metal concentrations were measured both for unwashed (dust-loaded) and washed leaves. Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed that unwashed leaves accumulated much dust due to atmospheric deposition. The value of magnetic properties and heavy metal concentrations in unwashed leaves was significantly higher than those of washed leaves, indicating that these characteristics were mainly derived from atmospheric particulate matter. Saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM) values obtained from unwashed and washed leaves ranged from 209.14 × 10−6 to 877.85 × 10−6 Am2 kg−1 and from 69.50 × 10−6 to 501.28 × 10−6 Am2 kg−1, respectively. High concentrations of heavy metals, such as Pb and Fe, the Tomlinson pollution load index, and the SIRM of unwashed leaves occurred in the traffic and industrial districts. A preliminary principal component analysis identified the source categories and suggested that industrial activities may be more related to the release of particulate matter rich in Fe. The heavy metal concentrations and pollution load index showed significant positive correlations with the low-frequency magnetic susceptibility and SIRM of unwashed leaves, indicating that these properties can be used to semi-quantify atmospheric heavy metal pollution. Our study suggests that it is possible to employ magnetic measurements as a useful tool for the monitoring and assessment of atmospheric heavy metal pollution.


Heavy metals Biomonitoring Environmental magnetism Spatial analysis 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41501549), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2016YFC0208504), and Open fund by Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (KHK 16001).

Supplementary material

11356_2017_133_MOESM1_ESM.doc (56 kb)
Table S1 (DOC 56 kb).


  1. Aidona E, Grison H, Petrovsky E, Kazakis N, Papadopoulou L, Voudouris K (2016) Magnetic characteristics and trace elements concentration in soils from Anthemountas River basin (North Greece): discrimination of different sources of magnetic enhancement. Environ Earth Sci 75.
  2. Angulo E (1996) The Tomlinson pollution load index applied to heavy metal, ‘mussel-watch’ data: a useful index to assess coastal pollution. Sci Total Environ 187:19–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blundell A, Hannam JA, Dearing JA, Boyle JF (2009) Detecting atmospheric pollution in surface soils using magnetic measurements: a reappraisal using an England and Wales database. Environ Pollut 157:2878–2890. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Břendová K, Zemanová V, Pavlíková D, Tlustoš P (2016) Utilization of biochar and activated carbon to reduce Cd, Pb and Zn phytoavailability and phytotoxicity for plants. J Environ Manag 181:637–645. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cakmak S et al (2014) Metal composition of fine particulate air pollution and acute changes in cardiorespiratory physiology. Environ Pollut 189C:208–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castanheiro A, Samson R, Wael KD (2016) Magnetic- and particle-based techniques to investigate metal deposition on urban green. Sci. Total Environ 571:594–602.
  7. Davila AF, Daniel R, Kais M, Belén R, Guerra AP (2006) Mapping the sources of urban dust in a coastal environment by measuring magnetic parameters of Platanus hispanica leaves. Environ Sci Technol 40:3922–3928. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dearing JA, Dann RJL, Hay K, Lees JA, Loveland PJ, Maher BA, O'Grady K (1996) Frequency-dependent susceptibility measurements of environmental materials. Geogr J Int 124:228–240. Google Scholar
  9. Dickerson AS et al (2015) Autism spectrum disorder prevalence and proximity to industrial facilities releasing arsenic, lead or mercury. Sci. Total Environ 536:245–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duan J, Tan J (2013) Atmospheric heavy metals and arsenic in China: situation, sources and control policies. Atmos Environ 74:93–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzierzanowski K, Popek R, Gawrońska H, Saebø A, Gawroński SW (2011) Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species. Int J Phy 13:1037. Google Scholar
  12. Ehrhardt P (1968) Der Vitaminbedarf einer siebröhrensaugenden Aphide, Neomyzus circumflexus Buckt. (Homoptera, Insecta). J Comp Physiol A 60:416–426. Google Scholar
  13. Fort M, Grimalt JO, Querol X, Casas M, Sunyer J (2015) Evaluation of atmospheric inputs as possible sources of antimony in pregnant women from urban areas. Sci Total Environ 544:391–399. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freer-Smith PH, Beckett KP, Taylor G (2005) Deposition velocities to Sorbus aria, Acer campestre, Populus deltoides × trichocarpa ‘Beaupré’, Pinus nigra and × Cupressocyparis leylandii for coarse, fine and ultra-fine particles in the urban environment. Environ Pollut 133:157–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gautam P, Blaha U, Appel E (2005) Magnetic susceptibility of dust-loaded leaves as a proxy of traffic-related heavy metal pollution in Kathmandu city, Nepal. Atmos Environ 39:2201–2211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geissman J (2003) Environmental magnetism: principles and applications of enviromagnetics. Eos Trans AGU 23:1867–1868. Google Scholar
  17. Hansard R, Maher BA, Kinnersley R (2011) Biomagnetic monitoring of industry-derived particulate pollution. Environ Pollut 159:1673–1681.
  18. Hofman J, Maher BA, Muxworthy AR, Wuyts K, Castanheiro A, Samson R (2017) Biomagnetic monitoring of atmospheric pollution: a review of magnetic signatures from biological sensors. Environ Sci Technol 51:6648–6664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofman J, Wuyts K, Van WS, Samson R (2014) On the temporal variation of leaf magnetic parameters: seasonal accumulation of leaf-deposited and leaf-encapsulated particles of a roadside tree crown. Sci. Total Environ 493C:766–772. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopke PK, Lamb RE, Natusch DFS (2002) Multielemental characterization of urban roadway dust. Environ Sci Technol 14:32–41. Google Scholar
  21. Kardel F, Wuyts K, Babanezhad M, Vitharana UWA, Wuytack T, Potters G, Samson R (2010) Assessing urban habitat quality based on specific leaf area and stomatal characteristics of Plantago Lanceolata L. Environ Pollut 158:788–794. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kardel F, Wuyts K, Maher BA, Samson R, Hansard R (2011) Leaf saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM) as a proxy for particulate matter monitoring: inter-species differences and in-season variation. Atmos Environ 45:5164–5171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King J, Banerjee SK, Marvin J, Özdemir Ö (1982) A comparison of different magnetic methods for determining the relative grain size of magnetite in natural materials: some results from lake sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 59:404–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehndorff E, Schwark L (2010) Biomonitoring of air quality in the cologne conurbation using pine needles as a passive sampler—part III: major and trace elements. Atmos Environ 44:2822–2829. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li H et al (2014) Magnetic properties as proxies for the evaluation of heavy metal contamination in urban street dusts of Nanjing. Southeast China Geogr J Int 199:1354–1366.
  26. Li H, Qian X, Wei HU, Wang Y, Gao H (2013) Chemical speciation and human health risk of trace metals in urban street dusts from a metropolitan city, Nanjing, SE China. Sci Total Environ 456-457C:212-221.
  27. Li H et al (2016) Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM 2.5 aerosols in a megacity of Southeast China. Atmos Res 181:288–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu L, Guan D (2012) The morphological structure of leaves and the dust-retaining capability of afforested plants in urban Guangzhou, South China. Environ Sci Pollu Res 19:3440–3449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maher BA, Moore C, Matzka J (2008) Spatial variation in vehicle-derived metal pollution identified by magnetic and elemental analysis of roadside tree leaves. Atmos Environ 42:364–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matzka J, Maher BA (1999) Magnetic biomonitoring of roadside tree leaves: identification of spatial and temporal variations in vehicle-derived particulates. Atmos Environ 33:4565–4569. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milica T, Mira A (2010) Trace element content in urban tree leaves and SEM-EDAX characterization of deposited particles Facta universitatis—series. Phys Chem Technol 02602634:546–519. Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell R, Maher BA (2009) Evaluation and application of biomagnetic monitoring of traffic-derived particulate pollution. Appl Mech Mats 186:273–279. Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell R, Maher BA, Kinnersley R (2010) Rates of particulate pollution deposition onto leaf surfaces: temporal and inter-species magnetic analyses. Environ Pollut 158:1472–1478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreno E, Sagnotti L, Dinarès-Turell J, Winkler A, Cascella A (2003) Biomonitoring of traffic air pollution in Rome using magnetic properties of tree leaves. Atmos Environ 37:2967–2977. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muxworthy AR, Matzka J, Davila AF, Petersen N (2003) Magnetic signature of daily sampled urban atmospheric particles. Atmos Environ 37:4163–4169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neli VJ, †, Jordanova DV, Veneva L, Yorova a K, Petrovsky§ E (2003) Magnetic response of soils and vegetation to heavy metal PollutionA case study. Environ Sci Technol 37:4417–4424.
  37. Norouzi S, Khademi H, Cano AF, Acosta JA (2016) Biomagnetic monitoring of heavy metals contamination in deposited atmospheric dust, a case study from Isfahan, Iran. J Environ Manage 173:55–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oldfield F (1991) Environmental magnetism—a personal perspective quaternary. Sci Rev 10:73–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oliva SR, Espinosa AJ (2007) Monitoring of heavy metals in Topsoils, atmospheric particles and plant leaves to identify possible contamination sources. Microchem J 86:131–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pandey SK, Tripathi BD, Prajapati SK, Mishra VK, Upadhyaya AR, Rai PK, Sharma AP (2001) Magnetic properties of vehicle-derived particulates and amelioration by Ficus Infectoria: a keystone species. Ambio A J Hm Environ 34:645–646. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Przybysz A, Sæbø A, Hanslin HM, Gawroński SW (2014) Accumulation of particulate matter and trace elements on vegetation as affected by pollution level, rainfall and the passage of time. Sci Total Environ 481:360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rai PK (2013) Environmental magnetic studies of particulates with special reference to biomagnetic monitoring using roadside plant leaves. Atmos Environ 72:113–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rai PK (2014) Biomagnetic monitoring of atmospheric particulate pollution through roadside tree leaves in Aizawl city, Mizoram and their temporal and spatial variationsGoogle Scholar
  44. Sant’Ovaia H, Lacerda MJ, Gomes C (2012) Particle pollution – an environmental magnetism study using biocollectors located in northern Portugal. Atmos Environ 61:340–349. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sgrigna G, Sæbø A, Gawronski S, Popek R, Calfapietra C (2015) Particulate matter deposition on Quercus ilex leaves in an industrial city of central Italy. Environ Pollut 197:187–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh AK, Hasnain SI, Banerjee DK (1999) Grain size and geochemical partitioning of heavy metals in sediments of the Damodar River—a tributary of the lower Ganga. India Environ Geol 39:90–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turan D, Kocahakimoglu C, Kavcar P, Gaygısız H, Atatanir L, Turgut C, Sofuoglu SC (2011) The use of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) leaves as a bioindicator for environmental pollution in the province of Aydın, Turkey. Environ Sci Pollu Res 18:355–364. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ugolini F, Tognetti R, Raschi A, Bacci L (2013) Quercus ilex L. as bioaccumulator for heavy metals in urban areas: effectiveness of leaf washing with distilled water and considerations on the trees distance from traffic. Urban For & Urban Gree 12:576–584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Urbat M, Lehndorff E, Schwark L (2004) Biomonitoring of air quality in the cologne conurbation using pine needles as a passive sampler—part I: magnetic properties. Atmos Environ 38:3781–3792. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber F, Kowarik I, Säumel I (2014) Herbaceous plants as filters: immobilization of particulates along urban street corridors. Environ Pollut 186:234–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu S et al (2013) Chemical constituents of fine particulate air pollution and pulmonary function in healthy adults: the healthy volunteer natural relocation study. J Hazard Mater 260:183–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang T, Liu Q, Li H, Zeng Q, Chan L (2010) Anthropogenic magnetic particles and heavy metals in the road dust: magnetic identification and its implications. Atmos Res 44:1175–1185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang C, Qiao Q, Appel E, Huang B (2012) Discriminating sources of anthropogenic heavy metals in urban street dusts using magnetic and chemical methods. J Geochem Explors 119–120:60–75.
  54. Zhu Z, Han Z, Bi X, Yang W (2012) The relationship between magnetic parameters and heavy metal contents of indoor dust in e-waste recycling impacted area, Southeast China. Sci Total Environ 433:302–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhu Z, Li Z, Bi X, Han Z, Yu G (2013) Response of magnetic properties to heavy metal pollution in dust from three industrial cities in China. J Hazard Maters 246–247:189–198.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of the EnvironmentNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (AEMPC), School of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations