Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 32, pp 25329–25345 | Cite as

The sustainable arable land use pattern under the tradeoff of agricultural production, economic development, and ecological protection—an analysis of Dongting Lake basin, China

  • Guanyi YinEmail author
  • Liming Liu
  • Xilong Jiang
Research Article

Abstract

To find a solution regarding sustainable arable land use pattern in the important grain-producing area during the rapid urbanization process, this study combined agricultural production, locational condition, and ecological protection to determine optimal arable land use. Dongting Lake basin, one of the major grain producing areas in China, was chosen as the study area. The analysis of land use transition, the calculation of arable land barycenter, the landscape indices of arable land patches, and the comprehensive evaluation of arable land quality(productivity, economic location, and ecological condition) were adopted in this study. The results showed that (1) in 1990–2000, the arable land increased by 11.77%, and the transformation between arable land and other land use types actively occurred; in 2000–2010, the arable land decreased by 0.71%, and more ecological area (forestland, grassland, and water area) were disturbed and transferred into arable land; (2) urban expansion of the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan city cluster (the major economy center of this area) induced the northward movement of the arable land barycenter; (3) the landscape fragmentation and decentralization degree of arable land patches increased during 1990–2010; (4) potential high-quality arable land is located in the zonal area around Dongting Lake, which contains the Li County, Linli County, Jinshi County, Taoyuan County, Taojiang County, Ningxiang County, Xiangxiang County, Shaoshan County, Miluo County, and Zhuzhou County. The inferior low-quality arable land is located in the northwestern Wuling mountainous area, the southeastern hilly area, and the densely populated big cities and their surrounding area. In the optimized arable land use pattern, the high-quality land should be intensively used, and the low-quality arable land should be reduced used or prohibitively used. What is more, it is necessary to quit the arable land away from the surrounding area of cities appropriately, in order to allow more space for urban expansion. This study could provide guidance for sustainable arable land use by both satisfying the future agricultural production and the local economic development, which can be used for the other major grain-producing areas in this rapid developing country.

Keywords

Arable land resources Agricultural production Economic development Ecological protection Optimized arable land use pattern 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41701590), the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Project No. 2017M612340), the Project supported by the Ministry of education for Humanities and Social Sciences (Project No. 17YJCZH228), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Project No. ZR2017BD004).

References

  1. Carr PM, Mäder P (2012) Editorial: overview and comparison of conservation tillage practices and organic farming in Europe and North America. J Intern Med 229:337–341Google Scholar
  2. Chen YJ, Yang JY, Fang LN (2014) Analysis of soil environmental quality status of arable land in China. J Agric Sci Technol 16:14–18Google Scholar
  3. Chen A, Zhao X, Yao L, Chen L (2016a) Application of a new integrated landscape index to predict potential urban heat islands. Ecol Indic 69:828–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Zhong S, Wei C (2016b) Potential evaluation method on plow layer soil-stripping of cultivated land occupied by non-agricultural construction. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 32(5):289–296Google Scholar
  5. Cho SH, Kim H, Roberts RK, Kim T, Lee D (2013) Effects of changes in forestland ownership on deforestation and urbanization and the resulting effects on greenhouse gas emissions. J Forest Econ 20:93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chun LJ (2014) Evolution of arable land and optimization of spatial distribution of basic farmland in Yinchuan. China agricultural university, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Gay H (2013) Before and after silent spring: from chemical pesticides to biological control and integrated pest management—Britain, 1945-1980. Ambix 59:88–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerhards R, Gutjahr C, Weis M, Keller M, Sökefeld M, Möhring J, Piepho HP (2012) Using precision farming technology to quantify yield effects attributed to weed competition and herbicide application. Weed Res 52:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley N, Wood C (2005) Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus convention. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He Y, Chen Y, Tang H, Yao Y, Peng Y, Chen Z (2011) Exploring spatial change and gravity center movement for ecosystem services value using a spatially explicit ecosystem services value index and gravity model. Environ Monit Assess 175:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu B, Zhai HJ, Zhang PC, Liu XL, Liu HH (2010) Study on the integrated process analysis system of runoff regulation and control technology and strategy of slope farmland. Procedia Environ Sci 2:496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang Q, Li M, Chen Z, Li F (2011) Land consolidation: an approach for sustainable development in rural China. AMBIO J Hum Environ 40:93–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hui Y, Liu SQ, Zhang HQ, Guo SL (2011) The dynamic evolution track and the coupling mode analysis for economic gravity center and population gravity center in the contiguous areas of Sichuan, Yunnan and Guizhou Province. Energy Procedia 13:10052–10060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huiyi Z, Xiubin L, Liangjie X (2007) Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. J Nat Resour 22:907–913Google Scholar
  15. Jing W, Chang IS, Bina O, Lam KC, He X (2011) Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China—five-year review and prospects. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jinrong S (2014) Study of《Qi Min Yao Shu》. Shandong University, JinanGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Li Y, Westlund H, Liu Y (2015) Urban–rural transformation in relation to cultivated land conversion in China: implications for optimizing land use and balanced regional development. Land Use Policy 47:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindhjem H, Hu T, Ma Z, Skjelvik JM, Song G, Vennemo H, Wu J, Zhang S (2007) Environmental economic impact assessment in China: problems and prospects ☆. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Long H, Li T, Tu S (2015) Land use transitions and their effects on water environment in Huang-Huai-Hai plain, China. Land Use Policy 47:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long H, Li Y, Liu Y, Woods M, Jian Z (2012) Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by ‘increasing vs. decreasing balance’ land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy 29:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2008) The national integrated land use planning (2006–2020). http://www.mlr.gov.cn/xwdt/jrxw/200810/t20081024_111040.htm
  23. Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1990) Landscape ecology: theory and application. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  24. Nyanga A, Kessler A, Tenge A (2016) Key socio-economic factors influencing sustainable land management investments in the west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Land Use Policy 51:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qiu Z, Chen B, Takemoto K (2014) Conservation of terraced paddy fields engaged with multiple stakeholders: the case of the Noto GIAHS site in Japan. Paddy Water Environ 12:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sánchez LE, Morrison-Saunders A (2011) Learning about knowledge management for improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: the western Australian experience. J Environ Manag 92:2260–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen A, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behavior. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sojneková M, Chytrý M (2015) From arable land to species-rich semi-natural grasslands: succession in abandoned fields in a dry region of central Europe. Ecol Eng 77:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang Y, Mason RJ, Wang Y (2015) Governments’ functions in the process of integrated consolidation and allocation of rural–urban construction land in China. J Rural Stud 42:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. The World Bank (2014) The arable land area in the world. http://www.worldbank.org/
  31. Wang Y, Scott S (2008) Illegal farmland conversion in China’s urban periphery: local regime and National Transitions. Urban Geogr 29:327–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang B, Li H, Sun D (2014) Social-ecological patterns of soil heavy metals based on a self-organizing map (SOM): a case study in Beijing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:3618–3638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wei S (2014) Decoupling cultivated land loss by construction occupation from economic growth in Beijing. Habitat Int 43:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wei S, Pijanowski BC (2014) The effects of China’s cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl Geogr 46:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wei S, Yunqiang Z, Chunxia G (2014) Spatial variation of crop production potential in Hunan Province and preliminary study on the impact of the total power of agricultural. Mach J Agric Mech Res 9:36–43Google Scholar
  36. White RR (2016) Increasing energy and protein use efficiency improves opportunities to decrease land use, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production. Agric Syst 146:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiangbin K, Fengrong Z, Yan X (2004) The progress and driving forces of change in arable land in intensive agricultural region during the past 50 years- a case study of Quzhou county in Hebei province. J Nat Resour 19:12–18Google Scholar
  39. Xu G, Cheng Y, Li P, Li Z, Zhang J, Wang T (2015) Effects of natural rainfall on soil and nutrient erosion on sloping cropland in a small watershed of the Dan River, China. Quatern Int 380:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu Q, Yang R, Dong YX, Liu YX, Qiu LR (2016) The influence of rapid urbanization and land use changes on terrestrial carbon sources/sinks in Guangzhou, China. Ecol Indic 70:304–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yin GY, Liu LM, Yuan CC (2015) Assessing environmental risks for high intensity agriculture using the material flow analysis method—a case study of the Dongting Lake basin in South Central China. Environ Monit Assess 187(7):472Google Scholar
  42. Yin G, Liu L, Xiao C, Jin S (2016) A comprehensive assessment of agricultural intensification scenarios for the Dongting Lake basin in south-central China in 2030. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(14):14018–14033Google Scholar
  43. Zheng H, Huang H, Zhang C, Li J, Clothier BE, Dierickx W, Oster J, Wichelns D (2016) National-scale paddy-upland rotation in northern China promotes sustainable development of cultivated land. Agric Water Manag 170:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhiming F (2007) Future food security and arable land guarantee for population development in China. Popul Res 31:15–20Google Scholar
  45. Zhong L, Liu L, Liu Y (2010) Natural disaster risk assessment of grain production in Dongting Lake area, China. Hydrometallurgy 1:24–32Google Scholar
  46. Zhou W, Huang G, Cadenasso ML (2011) Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 102:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu Z, Liu L, Chen Z, Zhang J, Verburg PH (2010) Land-use change simulation and assessment of driving factors in the loess hilly region—a case study as Pengyang County. Environ Monit Assess 164:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Geography and EnvironmentShandong Normal UniversityJinan CityChina
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations