Biochar composites with nano zerovalent iron and eggshell powder for nitrate removal from aqueous solution with coexisting chloride ions

  • Munir Ahmad
  • Mahtab Ahmad
  • Adel R. A. Usman
  • Abdullah S. Al-Faraj
  • Adel S. Abduljabbar
  • Mohammad I. Al-Wabel
Environmental functions of biochar
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 228 Downloads

Abstract

Biochar (BC) was produced from date palm tree leaves and its composites were prepared with nano zerovalent iron (nZVI-BC) and hen eggshell powder (EP-BC). The produced BC and its composites were characterized by SEM, XRD, BET, and FTIR for surface structural, mineralogical, and chemical groups and tested for their efficiency for nitrate removal from aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of chloride ions. The incidence of graphene and nano zerovalent iron (Fe0) in the nZVI-BC composite was confirmed by XRD. The nZVI-BC composite possessed highest surface area (220.92 m2 g−1), carbon (80.55%), nitrogen (3.78%), and hydrogen (11.09%) contents compared to other materials. Nitrate sorption data was fitted well to the Langmuir (R2 = 0.93–0.98) and Freundlich (R2 = 0.90–0.99) isotherms. The sorption kinetics was adequately explained by the pseudo-second-order, power function, and Elovich models. The nZVI-BC composite showed highest Langmuir predicted sorption capacity (148.10 mg g−1) followed by EP-BC composite (72.77 mg g−1). In addition to the high surface area, the higher nitrate removal capacity of nZVI-BC composite could be attributed to the combination of two processes, i.e., chemisorption (outer-sphere complexation) and reduction of nitrate to ammonia or nitrogen by Fe0. The appearance of Fe-O stretching and N-H bonds in post-sorption FTIR spectra of nZVI-BC composite suggested the occurrence of redox reaction and formation of Fe compound with N, such as ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O). Coexistence of chloride ions negatively influenced the nitrate sorption. The decrease in nitrate sorption with increasing chloride ion concentration was observed, which could be due to the competition of free active sites on the sorbents between nitrate and chloride ions. The nZVI-BC composite exhibited higher nitrate removal efficiency compared to other materials even in the presence of highest concentration (100 mg L−1) of coexisting chloride ion.

Keywords

Chemisorption Isotherm sorption Kinetic sorption Nano zerovalent iron Nitrate reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding this work through the international research group project IRG-14-02.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_125_MOESM1_ESM.docx (67 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 67 kb).

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2013) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nitrate/nitrite toxicity. What are the US standards for nitrate and nitrite levels?, pp 1–135. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.asp?csem=28
  2. Ahmad M, Usman RA, Lee SS, Kim S, Joo J, Yang JE, Ok YS (2012) Eggshell and coral wastes as low cost sorbents for the removal of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solutions. J Indust Eng Chem 18:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Oh SE, Mohan D, Moon DH, Lee YH, Ok YS (2013a) Modeling adsorption kinetics of trichloroethylene onto biochars derived from soybean stover and peanut shell wastes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8364–8373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Cho JS, Lee SE, Ok YS (2013b) Trichloroethylene adsorption by pine needle biochars produced at various pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresour Technol 143:615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad M, Ahmad M, Usman AR, Al-Faraj AS, Abduljabbar A, Ok YS, Al-Wabel MI (2017a) Date palm waste-derived biochar composites with silica and zeolite: synthesis, characterization and implication for carbon stability and recalcitrant potential. Environ Geochem health 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9947-0
  6. Ahmad M, Ahmad M, Usman AR, Al-Faraj AS, Ok YS, Hussain Q, Abduljabbar A, Al-Wabel MI (2017b) An efficient phosphorus scavenging from aqueous solution using magnesiothermally modified bio-calcite. Environ Technol 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1335349
  7. Alberti G, Amendola V, Pesavento M, Biesuz R (2007) Beyond the synthesis of novel solid phases: review on modeling of sorption phenomena. Coordin Chem Rev 256:28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1989) Annual book of ASTM standards D1762-84 281–282. Philadelphia, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck DA, Johnson GR, Spolek GA (2011) Amending green roof soil with biochar to affect runoff water quantity and quality. Environ Pollut 159:2111–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles JL (2010) Effects of biochar and green waste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environ Pollut 158:2282–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaa M (2011) A review of emerging adsorbents for nitrate removal from water. Chem Eng J 168:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blair GJ, Lefroy RDB, Lisle L (1995) Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Aust J Agric Res 46:1459–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buasri A, Chaiyut N, Loryuenyong V, Wongweang C, Khamsrisuk S (2013) Application of eggshell wastes as a heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production. Sust Energ 1:7–13Google Scholar
  14. Chang C, Lian F, Zhu L (2011) Simultaneous adsorption and degradation of g-HCH by nZVI/Cu bimetallic nanoparticles with activated carbon support. Environ Pollut 159:2507–2514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatterjee S, Lim SR, Woo SH (2010) Removal of reactive black 5 by zero-valent iron modified with various surfactants. Chem Eng J 160:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chintala R, Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Papiernik SK, Malo DD, Clay DE, Kumar S, Gulbrandson DW (2013) Nitrate sorption and desorption in biochars from fast pyrolysis. Micropor Mesopor Mater 179:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choe S, Chang Y, Hwang K, Khim J (2000) Kinetics of reductive denitrification by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 41:1307–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehghani M, Haidari E, Shahsavani S, Shamsedini N (2015) Removal of nitrate in the aqueous phase using granular ferric hydroxide. Jundishapur J Health Sci 7(2):e26419Google Scholar
  19. Devi P, Saroha AK (2014) Synthesis of the magnetic biochar composites for use as an adsorbent for the removal of pentachlorophenol from the effluent. Bioresour Technol 169:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobermann A, Cassman KG (2005) Cereal area and nitrogen use efficiency are drivers of future nitrogen fertilizer consumption. Sci. China. Ser. C Life Sciences/Chinese Acad Sci 48:745–758Google Scholar
  21. Flechard CR, Nemitz E, Smith RI, Fowler D, Vermeulen AT, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Simpson D, Zhang L, Tang YS, Sutton MA (2011) Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems: a comparison of inferential models across the NitroEurope network. Atmos Chem Phys 11(6):2703–2728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gai X, Wang H, Liu J, Zhai L, Liu S (2014) Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS One 9(12):e113888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Biomaterials 26:3995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guru PS, Dash S (2014) Sorption on eggshell waste—a review on ultrastructure, biomineralization and other applications. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 209:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hernández-Mena L, Pecora A, Beraldo A (2014) Slow pyrolysis of bamboo biomass: analysis of biochar properties. Chem Eng Transac 37:115–120. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1437020 Google Scholar
  27. Hu Q, Chen N, Feng C, Hu W (2015) Nitrate adsorption from aqueous solution using granular chitosan-Fe3+complex. Appl Surface Sci 347:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang YH, Zhang TC (2002) Kinetics of nitrate reduction by iron at near neutral pH. J Environ Eng 128:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Islam M, Mishra PC, Patel R (2010) Physicochemical characterization of hydroxyapatite and its application towards removal of nitrate from water. J Environ Manag 91:1883–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jagessar RC, Sooknundun L (2011) Determination of nitrate anion in waste water from nine selected areas of coastal Guyana via a spectrophotometric method. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 7(2):203–212Google Scholar
  31. Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J, Foid N, Smernik JR, Amonette LE (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Aust J Soil Res 48:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khan AM, Ahn Y, Kumar M, Lee W, Min B, Kim G, Cho D, Park WB, Jeon B (2011) Adsorption studies for the removal of nitrate using modified lignite granular activated carbon. Sep Sci Technol 46:2575–2584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim DK, Zhang Y, Voit W, Rao KV, Muhammed M (2001) Synthesis and characterization of surfactant-coated superparamagnetic monodispersed iron oxide nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 225:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landon MK, Delin GN, Komor SC, Regan CP (2000) Relation of pathways and transit times of recharge water to nitrate concentrations using stable isotope. Ground Water 38:381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management science and technology. Earthscan, UK, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  36. Li J, Li Y, Meng Q (2010) Removal of nitrate by zero-valent iron and pillared bentonite. J Hazard Mate 174:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J (2013) Enhanced removal of nitrate from water using surface modification of adsorbents—a review. J Environ Manag 131:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meng Y, Guan B, Wu Z, Wang D (2006) Enhanced degradation of carbon tetrachloride by surfactant-modified zero-valent iron. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 7:702–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nabizadeh R, Jahangiri-rad M, Rafiee M (2014) Counterion effects on nitrate adsorption from aqueous solution onto functionalized polyacrylonitrile coated with iron oxide nanoparticles. Res J Environ Sci 8:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Negrea P, Caunii A, Sarac I, Butnariu M (2015) The study of infrared spectrum of chitin and chitosan extract as potential sources of biomass. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 10:1129–1138Google Scholar
  42. Ok YS, Yang JE, Zhang YS, Kim SJ, Chung DY (2007) Heavy metal adsorption by a formulated zeolite-Portland cement mixture. J Hazard Mater 147(1):91–96Google Scholar
  43. Oliveira DA, Benelli P, Amante ER (2013) A literature review on adding value to solid residues: egg shells. J Cleaner Product 46:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park JY, Byun HJ, Choi WH, Kang WH (2008) Cement paste column for simultaneous removal of fluoride, phosphate, and nitrate in acidic wastewater. Chemosphere 70:1429–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phenrat T, Saleh N, Sirk K, Tilton RD, Lowry GV (2006) Aggregation and sedimentation of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions. Environ Sci Technol 41:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raihana MF, Sopyan I, Hamdi M, Ramesh S (2008) Novel chemical conversion of eggshell to hydroxyapatite powder. IFMBE Proc 21:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richard LA (1954) Diagnoses and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture handbook, 60: USDA, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson K (1997) Harmful or exceptional phytoplankton blooms in the marine ecosystem. Adv Mar Biol 31:301–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh R, Misra V, Singh RP (2011) Synthesis, characterization and role of zero-valent iron nanoparticle in removal of hexavalent chromium from chromium-spiked soil. J Nanopart Res 13:4063–4073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Site AD (2001) Factors affecting sorption of organic compounds in natural sorbent/water system and sorption coefficients for selected pollutants. A review J Phys Chem Ref Data 30:187–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun YP, Li XQ, Cao J, Zhang WX, Wang HP (2006) Characterization of zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 120:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tseng R, Wu F (2009) Analyzing a liquid–solid phase countercurrent two- and three-stage adsorption process with the Freundlich equation. J Hazard Mater 162:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Usman ARA, Abduljabbar A, Vithanage M, Ok YS, Ahmad M, Ahmad M, Elfaki J, Abdulazeem SS, Al-Wabel MI (2015) Biochar production from date palm waste: charring temperature induced changes in composition and surface chemistry. J Anal Appl Pyrol 115:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Uzum C, Shahwan T, Eroglu AE, Lieberwirth I, Scott TB, Hallam KR (2008) Application of zero valent iron nanoparticles for the removal of aqueous CO2+ ions under various experimental conditions. Chem Eng J 144:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O (2008) Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320:629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weyer PJ, Cerhan JR, Kross BC, Hallberg GR, Kantamneni J, Breuer G, Jones MP, Zheng W, Lynch CF (2001) Municipal drinking water nitrate level and cancer risk in older women: the Iowa women's health study. Epidemiology 12:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization, Geneva (WHO G) (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, Fourth Ed. World Health Organization 216:303–4Google Scholar
  58. Wu X, Yang Q, Xu D, Zhong Y, Luo K, Li X, Chen H, Zeng G (2013) Simultaneous adsorption/reduction of bromate by nanoscale zerovalent iron supported on modified activated carbon. Ind Eng Chem Re 52:12574–12581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu J, Gao N, Tang Y, Deng Y, Sui M (2010) Perchlorate removal using granular activated carbon supported iron compounds: synthesis, characterization and reactivity. J Environ Sci 22:1807–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xue D, Pang F, Meng F, Wang Z, Wu W (2015) Decision-tree-model identification of nitrate pollution activities in groundwater: a combination of a dual isotope approach and chemical ions. J Con Hydrol 180:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yan J, Han L, Gao W, Xue S, Chen M (2015) Biochar supported nanoscale zerovalent iron composite used as persulfate activator for removing trichloroethylene. Bioresour Technol 175:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang GCC, Lee H (2005) Chemical reduction of nitrate by nanosized iron: kinetics and pathways. Water Res 39:884–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ying L, Hofseth LJ (2007) An emerging role for endothelial nitric oxide synthase in chronic inflammation and cancer. Cancer Res 67(4):1407–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yuvakkumar R, Elango V, Rajendran V, Kannan N (2011) Preparation and characterization of zero valent iron nanoparticles. J Nanomater Biostruct 6:1771–1776Google Scholar
  66. Zhao X, Shi Y, Cai Y, Mou S (2008) Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-coated magnetic nanoparticles for the preconcentration of phenolic compounds from environmental water samples. Environ Sci Technol 42:1201–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhou Y, Gao G, Zimmerman AR, Chen H, Zhang M, Cao X (2014) Biochar-supported zerovalent iron for removal of various contaminants from aqueous solutions. Bioresour Technol 152:538–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zulfikar MA, Novita E, Hertadi R, Djajanti SD (2013) Removal of humic acid from peat water using untreated powdered eggshell as a low cost adsorbent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:1357–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil Sciences Department, College of Food & Agricultural SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological SciencesQuaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of AgricultureAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  4. 4.Industrial Psychology, College of EducationKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations