Cadmium losses in overland flow from an agricultural soil
Cadmium (Cd) transport in overland flow from agricultural soils is potentially important when trying to predict future soil Cd concentrations, but at present there is little information on the magnitude of loss from this pathway. This study measured Cd concentrations and fluxes in overland flow from a catchment where cattle winter-grazed a forage crop (kale) (Brassica oleracea) in year one and measurements continued in year two when the catchment was returned to pasture and grazed by sheep. Flow-weighted mean concentrations (FWMC) of total, particulate and dissolved Cd in overland flow events from the forage crop were 0.49, 0.41 and 0.08 μg L−1, respectively. In contrast, no dissolved Cd was detected in overland flow from pasture, with a FWMC of total Cd of 0.09 μg L−1. In line with the Cd concentrations, total Cd fluxes were greater from the forage crop (0.06 g Cd ha−1 year−1) than from pasture (0.04 g Cd ha−1 year−1). Cadmium losses in overland flow were relatively minor compared with those reported for other pathways such as plant uptake or subsurface flow. Further, compared to the amount of Cd that is currently added to soil in a maintenance application of phosphate fertiliser (30 kg P ha−1 year−1) which is on average 5.5 g Cd ha−1, Cd losses in overland flow represented < 1% of inputs. Measurement of Cd losses in overland flow should be undertaken at other sites to confirm the low Cd losses found in this study, along with the distribution between dissolved and particulate fractions.
KeywordsForage crop Pasture Sheep Cow Overland flow Cadmium
Chikako van Koten provided statistical advice and analysis. Funding for this work was provided by the Fertiliser Association of New Zealand (FANZ) and Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment AgResearch Core funding contract number A22699.
- Abraham E, Cavanagh J, Wood P, Pearson A, Mladenov P (2016) Cadmium in New Zealand’s agriculture and food systems. In: integrated nutrient and water management for sustainable farming. (Eds L. D. Currie and R. Singh). http://flrc.massey.ac.nz/publications.Html. Occasional report no. 29. Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Accessed 23 June 2016
- ANZECC (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Australian and New Zealand environment and conservation Council – Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
- Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK (1987) Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand soil bureau scientific report 80. Lower Hutt, New Zealand, NZ Soil BureauGoogle Scholar
- Cavanagh J (2014) Review of models to predict cadmium accumulation in agricultural soils: 2014. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand LC 1820. 20 pGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt AE (2010) New Zealand soil classification - 3rd edition, Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Metson AJ, Blakemore LC, Rhoades DA (1979) Methods for the determination of soil organic carbon: a review, and application to New Zealand soils. N Z J Sci 22:205–228Google Scholar
- Monaghan RM, Laurenson S, Dalley DE, Orchiston TS (2017) Grazing strategies for reducing contaminant losses to water from forage crop paddocks grazed by cattle during winter. N Z J Agric Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2017.1345763
- Rietra RPJJ, Mol G, Rietjens IMCM, Romkens PFAM (2017) Cadmium in soil, crops and resultant dietary exposure . Wageningen. Wageningen Environmental Research, Report 2784, 40ppGoogle Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (1992) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 5th ed. SMSS Technical Monograph 19Google Scholar