Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 30, pp 23850–23863 | Cite as

Bacillus safensis with plant-derived smoke stimulates rice growth under saline conditions

  • Muhammad Hafeez Ullah Khan
  • Jabar Zaman Khan Khattak
  • Muhammad Jamil
  • Ijaz Malook
  • Shahid Ullah Khan
  • Mehmood Jan
  • Ismail Din
  • Shah Saud
  • Muhammad Kamran
  • Hesham Alharby
  • Shah Fahad
Research Article

Abstract

Salinity is a worldwide environmental problem of agricultural lands. Smoke and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) are individually used to improve plant growth, but the combined effects of these have not been studied yet under saline conditions. The combined effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria Bacillus safensis and plant-derived smoke Cymbopogon jwarancusa was studied under different salinity level as 50, 100, and 150 mM on rice (cv. Basmati-385). Smoke dilutions of C. jwarancusa (C-500 and C-1000) and bacterial culture of B. safensis were used to soak seeds for 10 h. It was observed that the salt concentration decreases the germination percentage, vegetative growth, ion contents (K+ and Ca2+), and photosynthetic pigments (Chl “a,” Chl “b,” and carotene) while an increase occurred in Na+, total soluble protein (TSP), proline, total soluble sugar, catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) contents. The combined effect of B. safensis and smoke primed seeds increased the germination percentage, seedling growth, ion contents (K+, Ca2+), and photosynthetic pigments (Chl “a,” Chl “b,” carotene) and reduced the Na+ ion content, total soluble protein, proline content, total soluble sugar, CAT, and POD activity by lowering the drastic effect of salt stress. It was concluded that combined effect of smoke and PGPR is more effective than individual effect.

Keywords

Salinity Bacillus safensis Smoke Biochemical Antioxidant activities Ion contents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Higher Education Commission through grant No. 1348.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. Alsokari SS (2010) Synergistic effect of kinetin and spermine on some physiological aspects of seawater stressed Vigna sinensis plants. Saudi J Bio Sci 18:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirjani MR (2011) Effect of salinity stress on growth, sugar content, pigments and enzyme activity of rice. Int J Bot 7:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjum A, Abdin MA, Iqbal M (2005) Ameliorative effects of CaCl2 on growth, ionic relations, and proline content of senna under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr 28:101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araya F, Abarca O, Zuniga GE, Corcuera LJ (1991) Effects of NaCl on glycine betaine and on aphids in cereal seedlings. Phyto chem 30:1793–1795Google Scholar
  5. Asch F, Dingkuhn M, Dorffling K (2000) Salinity increases CO2 assimilation but reduces growth in field grown, irrigated rice. Plant Soil 218:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Awan JA, Salim UR (1997) Food analysis manual. Pak Vet J Pub 5:2Google Scholar
  7. Ayala-Astorga GI, Alcaraz-Meléndez L (2010) Salinity effects on protein content, lipid peroxidation, pigments, and proline in Paulownia imperialis (Siebold & Zuccarini) and Paulownia fortunei (Seemann & Hemsley) grown in vitro. Electron J Biotechnol 13(5):13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT (2006) Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hort 109:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant Soil 39:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey PM (1990) Oligosaccharides. In: Dey PM, Harborne JB (eds) Methods in plant biochemistry, vol 2. Carbohydrates. Academic Press, London, pp 189–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahad S, Bano A (2012) Effect of salicylic acid on physiological and biochemical characterization of maize grown in saline area. Pak J Bot 44:1433–1438Google Scholar
  13. Fahad S, Chen Y, Saud S, Wang K, Xiong D, Chen C, Wu C, Shah F, Nie L, Huang J (2013) Ultraviolet radiation effect on photosynthetic pigments, biochemical attributes, antioxidant enzyme activity and hormonal contents of wheat. J Food, Agri Environ 11(3&4):1 6 3 5–1 6 4 1Google Scholar
  14. Fahad S, Hussain S, Bano A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shan D, Khan FA, Khan F, Chen Y, Wu C, Tabassum MA, Chun MX, Afzal M, Jan A, Jan MT, Huang J (2014a) Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2
  15. Fahad S, Hussain S, Matloob A, Khan FA, Khaliq A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shan D, Khan F, Ullah N, Faiq M, Khan MR, Tareen AK, Khan A, Ullah A, Ullah N, Huang J (2014b) Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: a review. Plant Growth Regul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-0013-y
  16. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Tanveer M, Bajwa AA, Hassan S, Shah AN, Ullah A, Wu C, Khan FA, Shah F, Ullah S, Chen Y, Huang J (2015a) A biochar application protects rice pollen from high-temperature stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 96:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahad S, Nie L, Chen Y, Wu C, Xiong D, Saud S, Hongyan L, Cui K, Huang J (2015b) Crop plant hormones and environmental stress. Sustain Agric Rev 15:371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Khan F, Hassan S, Jr A, Nasim W, Arif M, Wang F, Huang J (2016a) Exogenously applied plant growth regulators affect heat-stressed rice pollens. J Agron Crop Sci 202:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Chauhan BS, Khan F et al (2016b) Responses of rapid viscoanalyzer profile and other rice grain qualities to exogenously applied plant growth regulators under high day and high night temperatures. PLoS One 11(7):e0159590.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Ihsan Z, Shah AN, Wu C, Yousaf M, Nasim W, Alharby H, Alghabari F, Huang J (2016c) Exogenously applied plant growth regulators enhance the morphophysiological growth and yield of rice under high temperature. Front Plant Sci 7:1250.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Tanveer M, Ihsan MZ, Shah AN, Ullah A, Nasrullah KF, Ullah S, Alharby H, Nasim W, Wu C, Huang J (2016d) A combined application of biochar and phosphorus alleviates heat-induced adversities on physiological, agronomical and quality attributes of rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 103:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, Sadia S, Nasim W, Adkins S, Saud S, Ihsan MZ, Alharby H, Wu C, Wang D, Huang J (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci 8:1147.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farooq M, Basra S, Rehman H, Hussain M, Amanat Y (2007) Pre-sowing salicylicate seed treatments improve the germination and early seedling growth in fine rice. Pak J Sci 44:44–47Google Scholar
  24. Gamal M, Fattah A, Ali H, Ibrahim K, Salem MA, Ahmed ES (2013) Synergistic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and spermine on amelioration of salinity stress of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. gimiza 9). AJCS 7(10):1525–1532Google Scholar
  25. Gelman A (2005) Analysis of variance? Why it is more important than ever. Ann Stat 33:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbrof EB (1997) Early development of canola seedlings in the presence of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Soil Biol Bioch 29:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:463–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoagland and Arnon (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Berkeley, Calif. University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  29. Iqbal M, Ashraf M (2007) Seed preconditioning modulates growth, ionic relations, and photosynthetic capacity in adult plants of hexaploid wheat under salt stress. J Plant Nutr 30:381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ismail AM, Thapa B, Egdane J (2009) Salinity tolerance in rice: physiological bases and implications on management strategies for better crop establishment. In: Improving productivity and livelihood for fragile environments. IRRI technical bull. 13. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, p 8–13Google Scholar
  31. Jamil M, Iqbal W, Bangash A, Rehman S, Imran QM, Rha ES (2010) Constitutive expression of OSC3H33, OSC3H50 and OSC3H37 genes in rice under salt stress. Pak J Bot 42:4003–4009Google Scholar
  32. Jamil M, Bashir S, Anwar S, Bibi S, Bangash A, Ullah F, Rha ES (2012) Effect of salinity on physiological and biochemical characteristics of different varieties of rice. Pak J Bot 44:7–13Google Scholar
  33. Jamil M, Malook I, Parveen S, Naz T, Ali A, Jan SU, Rehman SU (2013) Smoke priming a potent protective agent against salinity: effect on proline accumulation, elemental uptake, pigmental attributes and protein banding patterns of rice (Oryza sativa L.) J Stress Physiol Biochem 9(1):169–183Google Scholar
  34. Kabar K (1989) Interaction among salt (NaCl), Kn and gibberellic acid in the germination of lettuce seeds. Doga Turk Botanik Dergise 13:296–300Google Scholar
  35. Kang SM, Radhakrishnan R, Khan AL, Kim MJ, Park JM, Kim BR, Shin DH, Lee IJ (2014) Alleviation action of Pseudomonas putida H-2-3 producing gibberellin in drought and salt stress conditions on soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem 84:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaymak HC, Guvenç I, Yarali F, Donmez MF (2009) The effects of bio-priming with PGPR on germination of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seeds under saline conditions. Turk J Agric For 33:173–179Google Scholar
  37. Khan M, Izbal R, Mehar F, Tasir SP, Naser AA, Nafees AK (2015) Salicilic acid inducted abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6:462Google Scholar
  38. Kong-ngern K, Bunnag S, Theerakulpisut P (2012) Proline, hydrogen peroxide, membrane stability and antioxidant enzyme activity as potential indicators for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Int J Bot 8(2):54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kulkarni MG, Sparg SG, Light ME, Staden VJ (2006) Stimulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling vigour by smoke-water and butenolide. J Agron Crop Sci 192:395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumar KB, Khan PA (1982) Peroxidase in excised ragi (Eleusine coracana cv. PR 202) leaves during senescence. Ind J Exp Bot 20:412–416Google Scholar
  41. Lateef A, Adelere IA, Gueguim-Kana EB (2015) The biology and potential biotechnological applications of Bacillus safensis. Biologia 70(4):411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li CC (1964) Introduction to Experimental statistics. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19660080139
  43. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1985) Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls A and B of leaf in different solvents. Biol Soc Trans 11:591–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magda MA, Hameda ES, Ahmed ES, Jastaniah SD (2012) Synergistic effect between Azotobacter vinelandii and Streptomyces sp. isolated from saline soil on seed germination and growth of wheat plant. J Am Sci 8(5):667–676Google Scholar
  45. Malook I, Atlas A, Rehman SU, Wang W, Jamil M (2014) Smoke an environmental hazard: alleviate adverse effect of salt stress in rice. J Toxicological Environ Chem 96(5):755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mass EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 103(IR2):115–134Google Scholar
  47. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mervat S, Dawood MG (2013) Synergistic effect of indole acetic acid and kinetin on performance, some biochemical constituents and yield of Faba bean plant grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. World J Agric Sci 9(4):335–344Google Scholar
  49. Nabti E, Sahnoune M, Ghoul M, Fischer D, Hofmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M, Hartmann A (2010) Restoration of growth of durum wheat (Triticum durum var. waha) under saline conditions due to inoculation with the rhizosphere bacterium Azospirillum brasilense NH and extracts of the marine alga Ulva lactuca. J Plant Growth Regul 29:6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson DC, Riseborough J, Flematti GR, Stevens J, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Smith SM (2009) Karrikins discovered in smoke trigger Arabidopsis seed germination by a mechanism requiring gibberellic acid synthesis and light. Plant Physiol 149:863–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noman A, Fahad S, Aqeel M, Ali U, Amanullah, Anwar S, Baloch SK, Zainab M (2017) miRNAs: major modulators for crop growth and development under abiotic stresses. Biotechnol Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2302-9
  52. Osakabe Y, Kajita S, Osakabe K (2011) Genetic engineering of woody plants: current and future targets in a stressful environment. Physiol Plant 142:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuriakose SV, Prasad MNV (2007) Cadmium stress affects seed germination and seedling growth in Sorghum bicolor L. Moench by changing the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes. Plant Growth Regul 54:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qados AMA (2011) Effect of salt stress on plant growth and metabolism of bean plant Vicia faba L. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 10(1):7–15Google Scholar
  55. Qayyum MA, Malik MD (1988) Farm production losses in salt-affected soils. Proc. 1st Nat. Congr. Soil Sci., Lahore, p 356–364Google Scholar
  56. Ratnakar A, Rai A (2014) Salinity induced changes in β-carotene, thiamine, riboflavin and ascorbic acid content in Spinacia oleracea L. var. All Green. J Stress Physiol Biochem 10(2):259–264Google Scholar
  57. Rehman UR, Maqsood S, Ahmed B, Farooq M (2011) Field appraisal of seed priming to improve the growth, yield, and quality of direct seeded rice. Turk J Agric For 35:357–365Google Scholar
  58. Roohi A, Ahmed I, Khalid N, Iqbal M, Jamil M (2012) Isolation and phylogenetic identification of halotolerant/halophilic bacteria from the salt mines of Karak, Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 16(3):564–570Google Scholar
  59. Saritha V, Kuriakose, Prasad MNV (2007) Cadmium stress affects seed germination and seedling growth in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench by changing the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes. Plant growth regul. 54: 143–156Google Scholar
  60. Saud S, Chen Y, Long B, Fahad S, Sadiq A (2013) The different impact on the growth of cool season turf grass under the various conditions on salinity and draught stress. Int J Agric Sci Res 3:77–84Google Scholar
  61. Saud S, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang L, Fahad S, Hussain S, Sadiq A, Chen Y (2014) Silicon application increases drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morphophysiological functions. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/368694
  62. Saud S, Chen Y, Fahad S, Hussain S, Na L, Xin L, Alhussien SAAFE (2016) Silicate application increases the photosynthesis and its associated metabolic activities in Kentucky bluegrass under drought stress and post-drought recovery. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6957-x
  63. Saud S, Fahad S, Yajun C, Ihsan MZ, Hammad HM, Nasim W, Jr A, Arif M, Alharby H (2017) Effects of nitrogen supply on water stress and recovery mechanisms in Kentucky bluegrass plants. Front Plant Sci 8:983.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmfger MEV (2001) Complexation of metals and metalloids studies on the phytochelatin synthase. PhD Thesis, Munich University of Technology (TUM), MunichGoogle Scholar
  65. Shah G, Jan M, Afreen M, Anees M, Rehman S, Malook I, Jamil M (2016) Halophilic bacteria mediated phytoremediation of salt affected soils cultivated with rice. J Geo Chem Exploration 174:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shamseddin SM, Farahbakhsh H (2008) Investigation of quantitative and qualitative parameters of canola under salty conditions for determining the best tolerance index. J Sci Technol Agri Nat Resour 12:65–78Google Scholar
  67. Sparg SG, Kulkarni MG, Light ME, Staden VJ (2005) Improving seedling vigour of indigenous medicinal plants with smoke. Bio Resour Technol 96:1323–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Staden VJ, Sperg SG, Kulkarni MG, Light ME (2006) Post germination effect of the smoke derived compound 3-methyl-2H-furo [2, 3-c] pyran-2-one and its potential as a pre conditioning agent. Field Crops Res 98:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vardharajula S, Zulfikar SA, Grover M, Reddy G, Bandi V (2011) Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus sp. effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J Plant Interact 6(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yanni YG, Dazzo FB (2010) Enhancement of rice production using endophytic strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii in extensive field inoculation trials within the Egypt Nile delta. Plant Soil 336:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yildirim E, Taylor AG (2005) Effect of biological treatments on growth of bean plants under salt stress. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 48:176–177Google Scholar
  72. Zhang WM, Li B, Han L, Zhang HD (2009) Antioxidant activities of extracts from areca (Areca catectu L.) flower husk and seed. Afr J Biotech 8(16):3887–3892Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Hafeez Ullah Khan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jabar Zaman Khan Khattak
    • 1
  • Muhammad Jamil
    • 3
  • Ijaz Malook
    • 3
  • Shahid Ullah Khan
    • 2
  • Mehmood Jan
    • 4
  • Ismail Din
    • 1
  • Shah Saud
    • 5
  • Muhammad Kamran
    • 6
  • Hesham Alharby
    • 7
  • Shah Fahad
    • 2
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Bioinformatics & BiotechnologyInternational Islamic University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.College of Plant Science and TechnologyHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.Department of Biotechnology & Genetic engineeringKohat University of Science & TechnologyKohatPakistan
  4. 4.Zhejiang University HangzhouHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.College of HorticultureNortheast Agricultural University HarbinHeilongjiangChina
  6. 6.College of AgronomyNorthwest Agriculture and Forestry University YanglingShaanxiChina
  7. 7.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  8. 8.Department of AgricultureUniversity of SwabiKhyber PakhtunkhwaPakistan

Personalised recommendations